2. Home
  3. Archive
  4. Articles
  5. ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 3/2025. Economics and Management.

Valeriy N. Vasilenko

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Honored Worker of Science and Technology of Ukraine, Professor of the Department of Banking, Donetsk National University of Economics and Trade named after M. Tugan-Baranovsky, Donetsk, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-6284-8125

 

CONFIGURATION OF THE METHODOLOGY OF SPATIAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Размер файла106-122 Размер файла  315.85 KB Размер файла Full text

Currently, a spatial approach is becoming in demand, permeating the entire vertical of documents being developed aimed at implementing the state policy of territorial development. The spatial approach involves the study of the coexistence and interaction of multilevel and single-level objects (elements) forming the economic space. In this regard, there is an urgent need to identify the features of the methodology of spatial economic analysis. The article discusses the features of the formation of the methodology for spatial economic analysis, including: the logic of constructing a research scheme, the identified patterns of coexistence and interaction of objects, the principles of formation, a systematic approach to the use of spatial economic analysis, methods and ways of conducting spatial economic analysis, spatial data information base, instrumental techniques of spatial economic analysis, etc. It is concluded that the methodology of spatial economic analysis acquires a more complete form and provides a relationship between theoretical and practical competencies in the application of the spatial approach in the development of normative documents of the state policy of territorial development.

Keywords: methodology, economic space, spatial approach, spatial economic analysis, state policy of territorial development.

JEL: В49, R10, R12, R19

EDN: TYVRPC

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_106_122

References

  1. Khovansky A.D., Latun V.V., Bessmertny I.V. Comprehensive assessment of the spatial development of the Rostov region // Izvestiya vuzov. The North Caucasus region. Series: Natural Sciences. 2022. No. 4–2 (216–2). Pp. 90–98. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18522/1026-2237-2022-4-2-90-98.
  2. Vasilenko D.V. Strategic priorities of territorial development: from search to implementation: monograph / D.V. Vasilenko. Moscow: Buki Vedi, 2019. (In Russ.).
  3. Economic analysis of the activities of industrial enterprises and associations: guide / P.S. Danilov, V.G. Lebedev, F.K. Markelov et al. Moscow; Mysl, 1980. (In Russ.).
  4. Endovitsky D.A., Lyubushin N.P., Babicheva N.E. Dialectics of theoretical and methodological foundations of economic analysis // Economic analysis: theory and practice. 2015. No. 20 (419). Pp. 2–15. (In Russ.).
  5. Klimova N.V. Economic analysis: history and prospects of development // Economic analysis: theory and practice. 2009. No. 23. Pp. 2–8. (In Russ.).
  6. Plaskova N.S. Development of methodology of economic analysis // Accounting. Analysis. Audit. 2016. No. 1. 50–57. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2408-9303-2016-1-5057.
  7. Korogodin I.T. Methodology, methods and principles of analysis of economic laws and categories // Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and Management. 2005. No. 2. Pp. 32–41. (In Russ.).
  8. Mityaeva N.V. The specifics of the methodology for analyzing the development of economic systems // Industry: economics, management, technology. 2009. 5. Pp. 39–42. (In Russ.).
  9. Stechenko D.N., Chmyr E.S. Methodology of scientific research: monograph / D.N. Stechenko, E.S. Chmyr. K.: Znanie, 2007. (In Russ.).
  10. Makar S.V. Spatial analysis: the development of concepts and application possibilities // Bulletin of the Financial University. 2012. No. 2. 61–72. (In Russ.).
  11. Berestova T.F., Mikhailova A.V. Methodology of spatial approach in library science: prevalence and specificity of application // Bibliosphere. 2017. No. 4. Pp. 51–61. (In Russ.). DOI: 1020913/1815-3186-20174-51-61.
  12. Logical methods and forms of scientific cognition: monograph / V.T. Pavlov, K.F. Rudenko, I.S. Semenov and others. K.: Higher School, 1984. (In Russ.).
  13. The logic of scientific knowledge. Actual problems: monograph / Ed. by D.F.N. D.P. Gorsky, Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1987. (In Russ.).
  14. Suvorova A.V. Theoretical foundations of economic space research: the evolution of approaches // Journal of Economic Theory. 2020. Vol. 17. No. 3. Pp. 629–642. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31063/2073-6517/2020-17-3.9.
  15. Vasilenko V.N. The multidimensionality of the parameters of the region: territories, systems, spaces: monograph / V.N. Vasilenko. Druzhkovka: South-East, 2016. (In Russ.).
  16. Urunov A.A. The main categories of the theory of economic space // Scientific and practical electronic journal Alley of Science. 2017. No. 11. Alley-science.ru]. [electronic resource]. Access mode: https://alley-science.ru/domains_data/files/July7pdf. (In Russ.).
  17. Getmantsev K.V. Economic space: problems of formation and development: monograph / K.V. Getmantsev. Cheboksary: Publishing house «Wednesday», 2021. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31483/а-10329.
  18. Bochkova E.V. Conceptual foundations and economic essence of territorial division of labor // Bulletin of KrasSAU. 2014. No. 7. Pp. 8–12. (In Russ.).
  19. Fenin K.V. Interpretation of classical theories of territorial-sectoral division of labor and international trade // Izv. Sarath. University of Nov. ser. Ser. Economy. Management. Right. 2017. No. 2. Pp. 148–156. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18500/1994-2540-2017-17-2-148-156.
  20. Vasiliev S.A. The environment of territorial public residence and its structuring. // Theory and practice of state and municipal management: Collection of scientific papers. Issue 4. Tyumen: RIO TyumSUAC. 2010. Pp. 123–129. (In Russ.).
  21. Babanov V.N. Universal principles of management // News of TulSU. Economic and legal sciences. 2016. No. 4–1. Pp. 253–263. (In Russ.).
  22. Baburin V.L., Goryachko M.D., Demidova K.V., Makushin M.A. Core-peripheral model of industrial location: the world and Russia // Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 5. Geography. 2023. No. 4. Pp. 3–17. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.55959/MSU0579-9414-5.78.4.1.
  23. Bryzgunova O.V., Zhivodrova N.A. Principles of regulation of economic relations in modern constitutional law // Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2011. No. 3 (23). Pp. 41–52. (In Russ.).
  24. Kleiner G.B. The systemic paradigm in economic research: a new approach // Civilization of knowledge: Russian realities. Proceedings of the Eighth Scientific Conference Moscow (April 20–21, 2007) Moscow: ROSNOU. 2007. Pp. 453–457. (In Russ.).
  25. Guryeva M.A. Specific features of space development from the perspective of circular economy // Economic relations. 2020. Vol. 10. No. 3. Pp. 587–602. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/eo.10.3.110530.
  26. Kravchenko V.G. The content and meaning, the role of spatial data // International Journal of Applied Sciences and Technologies “Integral”. 2023. No. 1. Pp. 84–89. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.55186/27131424-2023-5-1-2.

Manuscript submission date: 29.04.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 30.06.2025

 

For citation:

Vasilenko V.N. Configuration of the Methodology of Spatial Economic Analysis // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 3. Pp. 106-122. (In Russ.).  https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_106_122  EDN: TYVRPC

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 3/2025. Economics and Management.

Vyacheslav N. Bobkov

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Honoured Science Worker of the Russian Federation, Chief Researcher, Head of the Department of Socioeconomic Research of Quality of Live and Living Standards of Center for Human Development, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-7364-5297

 

Elena V. Odintsova

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher, Department of Socioeconomic Research of Quality of Live and Living Standards of Center for Human Development, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-7906-8520

 

Igor B. Kolmakov

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), independent researcher, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-0582-6795

 

NORMATIVE-STATISTICAL AND RELATIVE MEDIAN APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION BY STANDARD OF LIVING

Размер файла84-105 Размер файла  361.69 KB Размер файла Full text

The paper is devoted to the problem of population differentiation by standard of living, which is considered in comparison of the results of applying two approaches to its identification. The author’s theoretical and methodological “framework” for identifying the socio-economic structure of the Russian population by standard of living has been updated. The identification of purchasing power by per capita monetary income of socio-economic groups of the Russian population has been carried out in accordance with the author’s normative statistical approach and an alternative relative median approach. Quantitative estimates of the scale of population groups identified on the basis of per capita monetary incomes and differing in the criteria of purchasing power are presented within the framework of two approaches. The results obtained are considered from the perspective of opportunities for updating social policy.

Keywords: standard of living, socio-economic groups of the population, monetary incomes, purchasing power of the population, criteria boundaries for the standard of living, distribution indicators, social policy.

JEL: E21, E64, I3

EDN: RXGWDH

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_84_105

References

  1. Anikin V.A., Lezhnina Y.P. Income Stratification: Putting a Spotlight on the Boundaries // The Russian Sociological Review. Vol. 17. No 1. Pp. 237–273. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2018-1-237-273.
  2. Bobkov V.N., Kolmakov I.B. Identifying the social structure and the inequality of monetary incomes of the population of the Russian Federation // Economy of Region. 2017. Vol. 13. Iss. 4. Pp. 971–984. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17059/2017-4-1.
  3. Bobkov V.N., Kolmakov I.B., Odintsova E.V. Social Structure of Russian Society in Terms of Housing Security: Criterio n and Quantitative Identifi cation, the Guide-lines for State Policy // Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2018. Vol. 14. No. 2. Pp. 8–23. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/1999-9836-2018-10011.
  4. Bobkov V.N., Herrmann P., Kolmakov I.B., Odintsova E.V. Two-Criterion Model of the Russian Society Stratifi cation by Income and Housing Security // Economy of Region. 2018. Vol. 14. Iss. 4. Pp. 1061–1075. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17059/2018–4–1.
  5. Bogomolova T.Y., Cherkashina T.Y. The Stratifi cation of Russian Households by Non-financial Wealth: Volume, Structure and Correlates // Mir Rossii. 2020. Vol. 29. No 4. Pp. 6–33. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2020-29-4-6-33.
  6. Grishina Е. Different Aspects of Poverty Among Families with Children // ECO. 2018. No 3. Pp. 7–26. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.30680/ЕСО0131-7652- 2018-3-7-26.
  7. Dolgushkin N.K., Odintsova E.V. Features of Property Security of Families with Children in Urban and Rural Areas // AIC: economics, management. 2023. No. 9. Pp. 107–116. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33305/239-107.
  8. The Quality and Standard of Living of the Population in New Russia (1991–2005). Moscow: All-Russian centre of living standard. 2007. (In Russ.).
  9. Korchagina I.I., Prokofieva L.M., Ter-Akopov S.A. Material deprivations in poverty estimations // Population. 2019. Vol. 22. No. 2. Pp. 51–63. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.19181/1561-7785-2019-00015.
  10. The model of income stratifi cation of Russian society: dynamics, factors, and cross-country comparisons / N.E. Tikhonova, Y.P. Lezhnina, S.V. Mareeva, V.A. Anikin, A.V. Karavai, E.D. Slobodenyuk; edited by Doctor of Sociological Sciences N.E. Tikhonova. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. 2018. (In Russ.).
  11. Monitoring of incomes and living standards of the Russian population – 2023 god. Yearbook. Iss. 2 (203) / V.N. Bobkov, A.A. Gulyugina, E.V. Odintsova [et al.]; edited by V.N. Bobkov, A.A. Gulyugina. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the RAS. 2024. (In Russ.).
  12. Ovcharova L.N. Theoretical and practical approaches to assessing the level, profile and factors of poverty: Russian and international experience. Moscow: M-Studio. 2009. (In Russ.).
  13. Subsistence minimum in the Russian Federation: normative documents, methodological recommendations, comments. Moscow: All-Russian centre of living standard, 2000. (In Russ.).
  14. Social policy, standard and quality of life: dictionary / under the general editorship of V.N. Bobkov. 2nd ed., add. and reprint. Moscow: All-Russian centre of living standard, “Rusaki”. (In Russ.).
  15. Middle Classes in the Capitalist Russia: Scientific monograph / edited by V.N. Bobkov. Moscow: KnoRus, 2018. (In Russ.).
  16. Tikhonova N.Ye. Stratifi cation by life chances of mass strata in modern Russian society // Sociological Studies. 2018. No 6. Pp. 53–65. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.7868/S0132162518060053.
  17. Banerjee A.V., Dufl o E. What is middle class about the middle classes around the world? // The Journal of Economic Perspectives: A Journal of the American Economic Association. 2008. Vol. 22. No. 2. Рр. 3–28. DOI: 10.1257/jep.22.2.3.
  18. Birdsall N., Graham C., Pett inato S. Stuck in Tunnel: Is Globalization Muddling the Middle? / Center on Social and Economic Dynamics. Working paper № 14. 2000.
  19. Calegari E., Fabrizi E., Mussida C. State Dependence in Material and Social Deprivation in European Single-Parent Households // Social Indicators Research. 2024. Vol. 172. Рр. 481–498. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-024-03317-8.
  20. Chancel L., Pikett y T., Saez E., Zucman G. et al. World Inequality Report 2022 / World Inequality Lab. https://wir2022.wid.world/www-site/uploads/2021/12/WorldInequalityReport2022_Full_Report.pdf (дата обращения: 19.02.2025). [Chancel L., Pikett y T., Saez E., Zucman G. et al. World Inequality Report 2022 / World Inequality Lab. https://wir2022.wid.world/www-site/uploads/2021/12/WorldIne-qualityReport2022_Full_Report.pdf (accessed: 19.02.2025).]
  21. Dallinger U. The endangered middle class? A comparative analysis of the role played by income redistribution // Journal of European Social Policy. 2013. Vol. 23. No. 1. Рр. 83–101. DOI: 10.1177/0958928712456573.
  22. Grabka M.M., Frick J.R. The Shrinking German Middle Class: Signs of Long-Term Polarization in Disposable Income? // Weekly Report. 2008. Vol. 4. № 4. Pр. 21–27.
  23. Grabka M.M., Goebel J., Schroder C., Schupp J. Shrinking Share of Middle-Income Group in Germany and the US // DIW Economic Bulletin. 2016. No. 18. Рр. 199–210.
  24. Gulyugina A., Odintsova E. On the economic sustainability of Russian households at a socially acceptable level // Stanovnistvo. 2024. Vol. 62. No. 2. Pp. 267–291. DOI: 10.59954/stnv.646.
  25. Kharas H. The Emerging Middle Class in Developing Countries / OECD Development Centre Working Papers, No. 285. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2010. DOI: 10.1787/5kmmp8lncrns-en.
  26. Kochhar R. The State of the American Middle Class. Who is in it and key trends from 1970 to 2023 / Pew Research Center. 2024. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/05/ RE_2024.05.31_American-Middle-Class_FINAL.pdf (дата обращения: 19.02.2025). [Kochhar R. The State of the American Middle Class. Who is in it and key trends from 1970 to 2023 / Pew Research Center. 2024. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/05/RE_2024.05.31_American-Middle-Class_FINAL.pdf (accessed: 19.02.2025)]
  27. López-Calva L.F., Ortiz-Juarez E. A vulnerability approach to the definition of the middle class // The Journal of Economic Inequality. 2014. Vol. 12. Pp. 23–47. DOI: 10.1007/s10888-012-9240-5.
  28. Mareeva S.V., Lezhnina Y.P. Income stratifi cation in Russia: what do different approaches demonstrate? // Studies of Transition States and Societies. 2019. Vol. 11. 2. Pp. 23–46.
  29. Milanovic B. Global income inequality: time to revise the elephant // Social Europe, 5.12.2022. https://www.socialeurope.eu/global-income-inequality-time-to-revise-theelephant (дата обращения: 20.02.2025). [Milanovic B. Global income inequality: time to revise the elephant // Social Europe, 5.12.2022. https://www.socialeurope.eu/globalincome-inequality-time-to-revise-the-elephant (accessed: 20.02.2025).]
  30. Milanovic B., Yitz haki S. Decomposing world income distribution: Does the world have a middle class? // Review of Income and Wealth. 2002. Vol. 48. No. 2. Рр. 155–178.
  31. Pressman S. The Decline of the Middle Class: An International Perspective // Journal of Economic Issues. 2007. Vol. 41. № 1. Pр. 181–200.
  32. Ravallion M. The developing world’s bulging (but vulnerable) middle class // World development. 2010. Vol. 38. No. 4. Рр. 445–454. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.11.007.
  33. Solimano A. The Middle Class and the Development Process / CEPAL. Serie Macroeconomia del desarrollo, No. 65. Santiago, 2008.

Manuscript submission date: 25.03.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 30.06.2025

 

For citation:

Bobkov V.N., Odintsova E.V., Kolmakov I.B. Normative-Statistical and Relative Median Approaches to the Study of Population Differentiation by Standard of Living // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 3. Pp. 84-105. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_84_105 EDN: RXGWDH

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 2/2025.  Economics and Management.

Olga I. Timofeeva

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher at the Center for Monitoring Budget Openness, Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Associate Professor of the Department of Public Finance, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-9255-4753

 

ON THE CONCEPT OF BUDGET OPENNESS (TRANSPARENCY)

Размер файла71-92 Размер файла  368.85 KB Размер файла Full text

Budget openness (transparency) is a new phenomenon in economic science. Currently, standards of budget openness (transparency) have been developed, its measurement is carried out, its impact on other socio-economic indicators or phenomena is determined. At the same time, the concept of “budget openness (transparency)” has not been theoretically developed well enough. The purpose of the article is to develop the theoretical basis of budget openness (transparency) based on clarification of its essential characteristics. For this, the terms that are used to denote budget openness (transparency) are considered, an overview of the definitions of these terms available in the literature is given. A conceptual representation of the idea of “budget openness (transparency)” was formed, and its definition was given. It is concretized and expanded. The author’s vision of the purpose of open budget data is also presented.

Keywords: public finances, management of public finances, budget, openness (transparency) of the budget, openness (transparency) of budget data.

JEL: E62, H00, H30, H61

EDN: LKRVWT

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_2_71_92

References

  1. Lawson A., Alvarez G. Synthesis Report on the piloting of the Subnational Open Budget Survey in Brazil, Indonesia and Tanzania. International Budget Partnership, 2013. https://internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/IBP-Synthesis-Report-on-SNOBS-Pilot-Surveys_final020714.pdf.
  2. Timofeeva O.I. Methodology and Results of Measuring the Transparency of Russian Regional Budgets. // Financial Journal. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 6. Pp. 44–58. DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2022-6-44-58. (In Russ.).
  3. Bronić M. et al. Budget Transparency in Croatian Counties, Cities and Municipalities: November 2021 – April 2022. // IPF Notes. 2022. Vol. 126. Pp. 1–16. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:242:700239.
  4. Shulian D. et al. Assessment of Chinese Fiscal Transparency at Provincial Level in 2017 // Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics. 2018. Vol. 20 (3). Pp. 18–28. https://qks.sufe.edu.cn/J/CDXB/Article/Details/A0shcjdxxb-20-3-dengshulian.
  5. Beales J., Thompson M. W. Government Transparency in Virginia: How Localities Compare. The Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy. 2010. https://www.thomasjeffersoninst.org/pdf/articles/Govt_Transparency_LocalGov.pdf.
  6. Olken B. Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia // Journal of Political Economy. 2007. Vol. 115. Iss. 2. Pp. 200–249. DOI: 10.1086/517935.
  7. Chen C., Neshkova M. I. The effect of fiscal transparency on corruption: A panel crosscountry analysis // Public Administration. 2020. Vol. 98. Iss. 1. 226–243. DOI: 10. 1111/padm.12620.
  8. Glennerster R., Shin Y. Does Transparency Pay? // IMF Economic Review. 2008. Vol. 55. Pp. 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.imfsp.9450028.
  9. Alt J., Lassen D. Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries // European Economic Review. 2006. Vol. 50. Iss. 6. Pp. 1403–1439. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.04.001.
  10. Ferraz C., Finan F. Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil’s Publicly Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2008. Vol. 123. Iss. 2. Pp. 703–745. DOI: 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.703.
  11. Hollyer J. R., Rosendorff B. P., Vreeland J. R. Democracy and transparency // The Journal of Politics. 2011. Vol. 73. Iss. 4. Pp. 1191–1205. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381611000880.
  12. Wehner J., de Renzio P. Citizens, Legislators, and Executive Disclosure: The Political Determinants of Fiscal Transparency // World Development. 2013. Vol. 41. Pp. 96–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.06.005.
  13. Belousov Yu. V. Transparent Budget in the System of Public Administration // Financial Journal. 2022. Vol. 14. Iss. 4. Pp. 79–91. DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2022-4-79-91. EDN OPYKAK.
  14. De Renzio P., Gomes P., Sheppard J. Budget transparency and development in resourcedependent countries // International social science journal. 2009. Vol. 57. Iss. s1. 57–69. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2451.2009.00706.x.
  15. Heald, D. Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive? // International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2012. Vol. 78. 1. Pp. 30–49. DOI: 10.1177/00208 52311429931.
  16. Larsson Т. How Open Can a Government Be? The Swedish Experience / Openness and Transparency in the European Union. Deckmyn V., Thomson I. (eds). Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration. Pp. 39–52.
  17. Public Finance Management: International Best Practices [Toolkit] (2017). M. – 600 p. https://minfin.gov.ru/common/upload/library/2018/04/main/Sbornik.pdf. (In Russ.).
  18. Michener G., Bersch K. Identifying Transparency // Information Polity. 2013. Vol. 18. Pp. 233–242. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262390668_Identifying_Transparency.
  19. Afanasieva O. V. «Open government» in the conceptual system of social science. Public Administration Issues. 2014. No. 1. Pp. 171–188. https://vgmu.hse.ru/ data/2014/10/08/1100895005/%D0%90%D1%84%D0%B0
    %D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0.pdf. (In Russ.).
  20. Heald D. Varieties of Transparency, in C. Hood, D. Heald (eds), Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? Proceedings of the British Academy (London, 2006; online edn, British Academy Scholarship Online, 31 Jan. 2012). Pp. 25–26. https://www.davidheald.com/ publications/Healdvarieties.pdf. DOI: 10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.003.0002.
  21. Dvinskikh D. Yu., Talapina E.V. (2019). Risks of data turnover development in public administration // Public Administration Issues. No. 3. Pp. 7–30. https://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2019/09/30/1543244225/%D0%94%D0%B2%D0%B8
    %D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%85,%20%D0%A2%D0%B0%D0%BB
    %D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0%203-2019.pdf.
  22. The Fiscal Transparency Code. 2019. https://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/ trans/Code2019.pdf. (In Russ.).
  23. Glossary of terms: guide on public participation in fiscal policy, 2017. https:// fiscaltransparency.net/glossary-of-terms-guide-on-public-participation-in-fiscalpolicy/.
  24. Detailed explanation of the High-Level Principles. 2018. URL: https://fiscaltransparency.net/detailed-explanation-of-the-high-level-principles/.
  25. OECD Best Practices for Budget Transparency. OECD Journal on Budgeting. 2002. Vol. 1. No. 3. Pp. 7–14.
  26. OECD Budget Transparency Toolkit: Practical Steps for Supporting Openness, Integrity and Accountability in Public Financial Management. OECD Publishing, Paris. 2017. P. 104. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-budget-transparencytoolkit_9789264282070-en.html.
  27. Government at a Glance 2019. OECD Publishing, Paris. 2019. DOI: 10.1787/8ccf5c38-en.
  28. Kopits G., Craig J. Transparency in government operations. International Monetary Fund. Washington DC. 1998. www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/op/158/op158.pdf.
  29. De Renzio Р., Wehner J. Fiscal Openness: A Review of the Evidence. GIFT, IBP. 2015. URL: https://internationalbudget.org/wp-content/uploads/impacts-of-fiscal-opennessgift-ibp-2015.pdf.
  30. Bauhr M., Grimes M. Transparency to curb corruption? Concepts, measures and empirical merit // Crime Law Soc Change. 2017. Vol. 68. Pp. 431–458. P. 440. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-017-9695-1.
  31. Dictionary on budget work. Budget and budget process / Beskrovnaya V.A., Vinogradova T.I., Orlov A.I. St. Petersburg: Norma. 2003. 56 p. (In Russ.).
  32. Alt J. Twenty years of transparency research // Public Sector Economics. 2019. Vol. 43. 5–13. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/317864. DOI: 10.3326/pse.43.1.2.
  33. Jung, H. Online Open Budget: The Effects of Budget Transparency on Budget Efficiency // Public Finance Review. 2022. Vol. 50. No. 1. Pp. 91-119. DOI: 10.1177/1091142122109 3412.
  34. Belousov Yu.V., Timofeeva O.I. Forecast of the digitalization impact on public financial management. The World of the New Economy. 2022. Vol. 16 (4). Pp. 113–123. DOI: 10.26794/2220-6469-2022-16-4-113-123. (In Russ.).

Manuscript submission date: 21.02.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 16.04.2025

 

For citation:

Timofeeva O.I. On the concept of budget openness (transparency) // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 2 Pp. 71-92. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_2_71_92  EDN: LKRVWT

  Creative Commons 4.0

 

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 3/2025. Economics and Management.

Sergey N. Mytyakov

Dr. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Рrofessor, Director of the Institute of Economics and Management, Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University named after R.E. Alekseev, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-7086-7457

 

METHOD OF ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING ECONOMIC CRISES

Размер файла58-83  Размер файла  1.1 MB Размер файла Full text

The purpose of this work is to develop a new method for analyzing economic crises that allows for timely detection of signs of emerging threats. Definitions of concepts are given, the main parameters of a crisis and parameters of crisis diffusion are determined. A model of crisis propagation as a sum of two logistic curves is presented. A multi-level system of indicators for monitoring economic crises with an information update period of one month has been developed. An algorithm for monitoring an economic crisis is proposed that includes six stages: a preliminary stage associated with the analysis of possible root causes and triggers of a crisis; monitoring of leading indicators; multi-level operational monitoring of economic crises; processing, generalization and analysis of information; forecasting; development of recommendations for the timely detection of crises. The new method for analyzing crises has been verified using the example of the development of the economic crisis of 2008–2009.

Keywords: economic crises, precursors, diffusion, operational monitoring of economic crises, indicators and threshold values, forecasting.

JEL: G01, F44

EDN: PBGGBO

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_58_83

References

  1. Keynes J.M. General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Moscow: Progress Publishing House, 1978. (In Russ.).
  2. Tugan-Baranovsky M. Industrial Crises in Modern England. SPb.: Economica, 1894. (In Russ.).
  3. Friedman M. Quantitative Theory of Money. M.: Elf-press, 1996. (In Russ.).
  4. Schumpeter J. Theory of Economic Development. M.: Progress, 1982. (In Russ.).
  5. Kondratiev N. D., Oparin D. I. Large Cycles of the Economy: Reports and Their Discussion at the Institute of Economics. –1st ed. M., 1928. (In Russ.).
  6. Pozdeev V.L. The End of 2020 – Recovery or Recession? // Development and Security. 2020. No. 4. P. 55–67. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.46960/2713-2633_2020_4_55.
  7. Veduta E.N., Dzhakubova T.N. Economic Science and Economic-Mathematical Modeling // Public Administration. Electronic Bulletin. Iss. No. 57. August 2016. P. 287–307 (In Russ.). EDN: WMGFJF.
  8. Burns A.F., Mitchel, W.C. Measuring Business Cycles. N.Y. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1946.
  9. Moore G. Business Cycles Indicators: Contributions to the analysis of current business conditions. Published by Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1961.
  10. Andersson Eva, David Bock and Marianne Frisén. Detection of Turning Points in Business Cycles // Journal of Business Cycle Measurement and Analysis. 2004. Vol. 1. No. 1. Pр. 93–108.
  11. Boldin Michael D. Dating Turning Points in the Business Cycle // The Journal of Business. Jan. 1994. Vol. 67. No. 1. Pр. 97–131.
  12. Chaffin, Wilkie W. and Wayne K. Talley. Diffusion indexes and a statistical test for predicting turning points in business cycles // International Journal of Forecasting. Vol. 5. Pр. 29–36.
  13. Chauvet Marcelle, Jeremy M. Piger. Identifying Business Cycle Turning Points in Real Time // Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review. March–April 2003. Pр. 47–62. DOI: 10.20955/r.85.47-61.
  14. Chen Max. The Use of the Composite Leading Index for Forecasting Business Cycle Turning Points // American Statistical Association. Proceedings of the 2002 Joint Statistical Meetings. Business & Economic Statistics Section. Pр. 509–518.
  15. Koskinen, Lasse and Lars-Erik Öller. A Classifying Procedure for Signalling Turning Points // Journal of Forecasting. 2004. Vol. 23. Pр. 197–214.
  16. Hagerstrand T. Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.
  17. Haefner L., Sternberg R. Spatial Implications of Digitization: State of the Field and Research Agenda // Geography Compass. 2020. Vol. 14. 12. e12544. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12544.
  18. Blanutsa V.I. Spatial Diffusion of Digital Innovations: Trends, Problems, and Prospects for Empirical Research // Spatial Economics. 2021. Vol. 17. No. 4. Pp. 118–142. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14530/se.2021.4.118-142.
  19. Schmidt Yu.D., Lobodina O.N. On Some Approaches to Modeling the Spatial Diffusion of Innovations // Spatial Economics. 2015. No. 2. Pp. 103–115. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14530/se.2015.2.103-115.
  20. Shcherbakov G.A. Anti-innovations of the financial sector as a factor in the formation of crises // Economy and Management: Problems, Solutions. 2020. Vol. 3. No. 8 (104). P. 4–10. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34684/ek.up.p.r.2020.08.03.001.
  21. Senchagov V.K., Mityakov S.N. Comparative analysis of the impact of the financial and economic crises of 1998 and 2008–2009 on the indicators of economic security of Russia // Bulletin of the Financial University. 2013. No. 6 (78). Pр. 71–88. (In Russ.). EDN: TGFGML.
  22. Senchagov V.K., Mityakov S.N. Assessment of crises in the economy using short-term indicators and average indices of economic security of Russia // Problems of Forecasting. 2016. No. 2 (155). Pp. 44–58. (In Russ.). EDN: WFMKJV.
  23. Mityakov S.N., Mityakov E.S. Analysis of crisis phenomena in the Russian economy using fast indicators of economic security // Problems of Forecasting. 2021. No. 3 (186). P. 29–40. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-186-29-40.
  24. Nazarova E.A. Conceptual Foundations of Operational Monitoring of the Country’s Economic Security // Development and Security. 2022. No. 3 (15). P. 42–50. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.46960/2713-2633_2022_3_42.
  25. Nazarova E.A. Multilevel System of Fast Indicators and the Procedure for Conducting Operational Monitoring of Economic Security // Financial Banks and Markets. 2024. No. 6. P. 303–309. (In Russ.). EDN: FRJVSM.
  26. Mityakov S.N., Mityakov E.S. Development of the Theory of Risks and Threshold Values of Economic Security // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023. No. 5. P. 83–113. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2023_5_83_113.
  27. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovation. New York: The Free Press, 2003.
  28. Dhakal T., Lim D.-E. Understanding ICT Adoption in SAARC Member Countries // Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences. 2020. Vol. 13. Pp. 67–80. DOI: 10.1007/s12076-020-00245-2.
  29. Smirnov A.D. Asset Collateral of the Macrofinancial System and Stochastic Dynamics of Leverage // HSE Economic Journal. 2014. No. 2. Pp. 183–215. (In Russ.).
  30. Agayan G.M., Grigoryan A.A., Shikin E.V. Crises: comprehensive management analysis // Public administration. Electronic Bulletin. 2016. No. 57. Pp. 69–114. (In Russ.). EDN: WMGFFJ.

Manuscript submission date: 20.04.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 30.06.2025

 

For citation:

Mytyakov S.N. Method of Analysis and Forecasting Economic Crises // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 3 Pp. 58-83. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_58_83 EDN: PBGGBO

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 2/2025.  Economics and Management.

Andrey A. Maltsev

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Leading Researcher, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-3774-6311

 

Sergey V. Chichilimov

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Junior Researcher, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-3681-4279

 

REGIONAL AND INDUSTRIAL RESTRUCTURING OF INVESTMENT FLOWS AS A FACTOR OF STRENGTHENING THE SUSTAINABILITY OF THE URAL’S ECONOMY

Размер файла52-70 Размер файла  336.88 KB Размер файла Full text

The article considers the state of the economy and investment complex of the Urals. It reveals the persistence of the underinvestment in the macroregion economy, which causes the level of depreciation of fixed assets exceeding the average Russian level. The author’s methodology for analyzing the investment activity of the Ural business has been developed, based on a “field” study of changes in the dynamics of the implementation of investment projects in industry and agriculture. A comparative analysis of regional and sectoral restructuring of investment flows has made it possible to identify the main features of the restoration and increase of investment activity in the Urals. The hypothesis about the beginning of an investment cycle based on the accumulation of industrial capital has received well-grounded confirmation.

Keywords: state support, investment project, investor, industry, agriculture, the economy of the Urals.

JEL: E22, O13, O14

EDN: HBDOFE

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_2_52_70

References

  1. Gusev M.S., Klepach A.N., Shirov A.A. Evolution of Strategic Goal Setting in 2008-2023 and Requirements for Macroeconomic Policy in the Current Operating Conditions of the Russian Economy // Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2024. No. 5. 20–33. DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-206-20-33. (In Russ).
  2. Nikolaev I.A. Drivers of Economic Growth: Opportunities and Prospects in the Sub-Sanctions Economy of Russia // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023. No. 1. Pp. 58–74. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2023_1_58_74. (In Russ).
  3. Smorodinskaya N.V., Katukov D.D. Moving Towards Technological Sovereignty: A New Global Trend and the Russian Specifics // Baltic Region. 2024. Vol. 16. No. 3. 108–135. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2024-3-6. (In Russ).
  4. Shirov A.A. Development of the Russian Economy in the Medium Term: Risks and Opportunities // Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 6–17. DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-197-6-17. (In Russ).

Manuscript submission date: 09.01.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 16.04.2025

 

For citation:

Maltsev A.A., Chichilimov S.V. Regional and industrial restructuring of investment flows as a factor of strengthening the sustainability of the Ural’s economy // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. №. 2. Pp. 52-70. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_2_52_70 EDN: HBDOFE

  Creative Commons 4.0

  1. Kislitsyna O.A. RUSSIANS’ PERCEPTION OF THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL FACTORS ON HEALTH
  2. Dolzhenko R.A., Dolzhenko S.B. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT IN ORDER TO INCREASE LABOR PRODUCTIVITY AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCY
  3. Konovalov D.E. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF OBJECTIVES IN STRATEGIC PLANNING DOCUMENTS IN THE CULTURAL DOMAIN
  4. Bratchenko S.A. GOAL SETTING IN STATE GOVERNANCE: ISSUES OF ACHIEVABILITY, RELEVANCE AND CONSISTENCY OF GOALS

© Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2021 - 2024

32, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, Moscow, Russia 117218, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Phone.: +7 (499) 724-13-91, E-mail: vestnik-ieran@inbox.ru

  

Russian version

HOME

JOURNAL DESCRIPTION

General information

Editorial policies

Author guidelines

LATEST ISSUE

ARCHIVE

Editorial advisory board

Editorial team

Author guidelines

Submit article