The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 4/2025. World Economy. 

Nadezhda D. Frolova

Ph.D in Economic Sciences, Senior Researcher of the Center for Public Administration Research, Institute of Economics of the RAS, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-3696-2688

 

ON THE ROLE OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES IN THE ECONOMY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS

Размер файла166-182 Размер файла  610.92 K Размер файла Full text

The article examines modern research approaches to assessing the role of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the economy of the Republic of Belarus. There are the results of the analysis of the main statistical indicators characterizing the activities of Belarusian SOEs. The study highlights key trends of their development and emphasizes dominant role of Belarusian SOEs in the national economy. The risks caused by the low efficiency of the management system are also emphasized.

Keywords: state-owned enterprises, state capitalism, government’s role in the economy, effectiveness of state-owned enterprises, management of state-owned enterprises.

JEL: H82, H32, P26

EDN: IEVMFW

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_4_167_182

References

  1. Astakhova S. Belarus: Cooperation with Russia in the Conditions of the Sanctions // Russia and New States of Eurasia. 2023. No. 2 (59). Pp. 103–111. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/2073-4786-2023-2-103-111. EDN: RGJEMQ.
  2. Grosman A., Kozarzewski P., Okhmatovskiy I. Varieties of capitalism in central and eastern Europe. In book: Oxford Handbook of Central and East European Management and OrganizationsPublisher: Oxford University Press, 2023.
  3. Rudy K. State Capitalism in Belarus // World Eсonomy and International Relations. 2016. Vol. 60. No. 4. 77–85. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-4-77-85. EDN: VZRXNP.
  4. Rudy K. State Capitalism in Belarus: Behind Economic Anemia [Internet. Public Sector Crisis Management. IntechOpen, 2020. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.93606.
  5. Rudy K. Behavioral Economy: Main Features in Belarus // World Eсonomy and International Relations. 2018. Vol. 62. No. 6. Pp. 36-44. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-6-36-44. EDN: XQMYTR.
  6. Rudy K. State Capitalism Reforms and the Path for Belarus: Financial Diet. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2020.
  7. Kozarzewski P., Papko A. The Belarusian Development Path: From Command Economy to State Capitalism? In: Ricz J., Gerőcs T. (eds.). The Political Economy of Emerging Markets and Alternative Development Paths. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-20702-0_7.
  8. Hajduk K. The sector of state-owned enterprises: structural challenges // Bankauski vesnik. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 26–30. (In Russ.).
  9. Daneyko P., Chubrik A., Gaiduk K., Bornukova K., Kruk D. Transformation of the sector of stateowned commercial enterprises in Belarus // IPM Research Center, BEROC Center for Economic Research, 2020. https://research.by/webroot/delivery/files/pdp2020r07.pdf (accessed: 11.02.2025). (In Russ.).
  10. Frolova N.D. The governance of companies with state participation (international experience): Scientific report. М.: Institute of Economics of the RAS, 2024. (In Russ.).
  11. Kim K. The Role of State Ownership: Overview of State-Owned Entities in the Global Economy. Roosevelt Institute, 12.02.2024. https://rooseveltinstitute.org/publications/the-role-of-state-ownership
  12. Alami I., Dixon A. D., Gonzalez-Vicente R., Babic M., Seung-Ook L., Medby I. A., Graaff N. Geopolitics and the ‘New’ State Capitalism // Geopolitics. 2021. Vol. 27. Iss. 3. 995–1023. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2021.1924943.
  13. Vagliasindi M., Cordella T., Clifton J. Introduction: Revisiting the Role of State-Owned Enterprises in Strategic Sectors // Journal of Economic Policy Reform. 2022. Vol. 26. 1. Pp. 1–23. DOI: 10.1080/17487870.2022.2080409.
  14. Bernier L, Florio M., Bance Ph. The Routledge Handbook of State-Owned Enterprises. New York. Routledge. 2020. DOI: 10.4324/9781351042543.
  15. Smotritskaya I.I., Frolova N.D. To the issue of development of entrepreneurial state activity // Society and Economy. 2024. No. 4. Pp. 5–16. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S0207367624040012.
  16. Qi H., Kotz D.M. The Impact of State-Owned Enterprises on China’s Economic Growth // Review of Radical Political Economics. 2020. Vol. 52. Iss. 1. Pp. 96–114. DOI: 10.1177/0486613419857249.
  17. Belloc F. Innovation in State-Owned Enterprises: Reconsidering the Conventional Wisdom // Journal of Economic Issues. 2014. No. 48 (3). Pp. 821–848. DOI: 10.2753/JEI0021-3624480311.
  18. Castelnovo P. Innovation in private and state-owned enterprises: A cross-industry analysis of patenting activity // Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2022. Vol. 62. Pp. 98–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2022.05.007.
  19. Polterovich V.M. Privatization and the rational ownership structure. Part 1: privatization: the efficiency problem // The economic science of modern Russia. 2012. No. 4 (59). Pp. 7–23 (In Russ.).

Manuscript submission date: 18.02.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 07.08.2025

 

For citation:

Frolova N.D. On the role of state-owned enterprises in the economy of the Republic of Belarus // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 4. Pp. 167-182. (In Russ.).  https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_4_167_182  EDN: IEVMFW

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 4/2025. World Economy. 

Anna V. Belitskaya

Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Entrepreneurial Law of the Faculty of Law, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-6988-4022

 

Artem A. Yakovlev

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Deputy Director of the Moscow School of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Leading Researcher, Institute of Economics of the RAS, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0009-0004-5579-4458

 

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A NEW LEVEL OF A SOCIAL CONTRACT?

Размер файла150-166 Размер файла  315.06 KB Размер файла Full text

The purpose of this study is to identify the role of the social contract as a factor influencing the redistribution of resources within the framework of international economic integration, the effectiveness of creating a common market, solving the problems of ensuring the sustainability of economic growth, inequality and unemployment. In the course of the work, it was scientifically substantiated that the effectiveness of international economic integration depends on the presence of a social contract at the supranational level, supported by the possibility of distributing part of the rent not only by the state, but also directly by the integration association, as well as the possibility of creating supranational inclusive institutions within the framework of a common market of goods, capital and labor.

Keywords: international economic integration, regional economic integration, social contract, inclusive institutions, national economy, common market of goods, capital, labor, supranational level.

JEL: F15

EDN: YWUDKR

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_4_150_166

References

  1. Kheifets B.A. New model of international economic integration. M.: Institute of Economics of the RAS, 2023. (In Russ.)
  2. Shishkov Yu.V. Integration and disintegration: concept adjustment. World Economy and International Relations. 1993. No. 10. Pp. 50–68. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-1993-10-50-68.
  3. Politics / Ed. by A.I. Dovatur. Moscow: Publishing House “Yurait”, 2025. (In Russ.).
  4. List F. National system of political economy. Moscow; Chelyabinsk: Socium, 2017. (In Russ.).
  5. Engaged Societies, Responsive States: The Social Contract in Situations of Conflict and Fragility. Concept Note. April 2016. P.9. New York, 2016, https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/Social_Contract_
    in_Situations_of_Conflict_and_Fragility.pdf (accessed: 23.04.2025).
  6. Buchanan J., Tullock G. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor, 1962.
  7. Myrdal G. World Economy: Problems and Prospects. Moscow, 1958. (In Russ.).
  8. Ushkalova D.I., Golovnin M.Yu. Theoretical Approaches to the Study of International Economic Integration. M.: Institute of Economics of the RAS, 2011. (In Russ.).
  9. Haas E.B. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1958.
  10. Milward A. The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London, 2000.
  11. Deutsch K. Political Community at the International Level: Problems of Definition and Measurement. Princeton, New Jersey, 1953.
  12. Habermas J. Involving the Other: Essays on Political Theory. Moscow: Nauka, 2008. (In Russ.).
  13. Political Economy of Russia: Dynamics of the Social Contract in the 2000s. Selected Works of the Institute of the National Project “Social Contract”, 2000–2009 / Compiled by A.A. Auzan, A.V. Zolotov, A.A. Stavinskaya, V.L. Tambovtsev. М., 2010. (In Russ.).
  14. Mitrany D. A Working Peace System. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1966.
  15. Genna G.M., Yang Z., Abdollahian M. Regional Integration and Economic Development: Optimal or Messy Networks? The Journal of Economic Integration. 2024. No. 39 (3). Pp. 557–589. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2024029 (accessed: 12.07.2025).
  16. Haas E.B., Schmitter P. Economics and Differential Patterns of Political Integration: Projections about Unity in Latin America // International Organization. Vol. 18. No. 4. P. 710.
  17. Turaeva M., Yakovlev A. History of the Global Climate Agenda and Its Future in the Eurasian Economic Union // ISTORIYA. 2024. Vol. 15. Iss. 6 (140). https://history.jes.su/s207987840031942-5-1/. (accessed: 12.07.2025). (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840031942-5.
  18. Вutorina V.O. The Goals of Regional Integration: A Modern Understanding // World Economy and International Relations. 2021. Vol. 65. No. 10. Pp. 5–14. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-10-5-14.
  19. Streeten P. Economic Integration, Aspects and Problems. Leyden: A.W. Sythoff, 1964.
  20. Butorina O.V., Borko Yu.A. Benefits of Regional Integration: Reconsidering the Concept // Modern Europe. 2022. No. 1 (108). Pp. 5–20. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S0201708322010016.
  21. Ushkalova D.I. Models of Economic Integration and Their Typology // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2016. No. 3. Pp. 158–170. (In Russ.).
  22. Tinbergen J. International Economic Integration. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1954.
  23. Nekipelov A.D. Search for social optimum: chasing a ghost? // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023. No. 93 (5). Pp. 415–427. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S0869587323050080.
  24. Polterovich V.M. Collaborative hierarchies // Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021. No. 7. Pp. 31–48. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-7-31-48.
  25. Rodrik D. How Far Will International Economic Integration Go? // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 14. No. 1. 2000. Pp. 177–186.

Manuscript submission date: 20.04.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 07.08.2025

 

For citation:

Belitskaya A.V., Yakovlev A.A. International economic integration: a new level of a social contract? // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 4. Pp. 150-166. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_4_150_166 EDN: YWUDKR

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 3/2025. World Economy. 

Georgii D. Paksiutov

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher, Center for Japanese Studies, Institute of China and Contemporary Asia, the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-7153-4315

 

JAPAN AND SOUTH KOREA’S CREATIVE INDUSTRIES: COMPETITION AND THE PROSPECTS OF COOPERATION

Размер файла181-198 Размер файла  341.31 KB Размер файла Full text

The article examines a number of trends defining the specific characteristics and the global standing of the creative industries in Japan and South Korea. We highlight Japan’s relative resistance to the processes of digitalization of production and distribution on the cultural markets. In contrast, South Korean popular culture industries have been developing in close cooperation with the information technology industry since the 1990s. We examine the factors that could contribute to the success of the currently expanding collaboration between Japan and South Korea in the production of cultural goods. It is emphasized that the concept of the creative industries in its current form implies the danger of instrumentalization of culture.

Keywords: creative industries, cultural industries, cultural goods, Japan-South Korea economic relations, «Korean wave», Cool Japan.

JEL: Z1, N75

EDN: ZBVZUK

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_181_198

References

  1. Towse R. Creative Industries // Towse R., Navarrete Hernández T. (eds.). Handbook of Cultural Economics (Third edition). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020. Pp. 137–144.
  2. Muzychuk V.Yu. Creative Industries: Challenges for the Non-Commercial Segment of the Cultural Sector // The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023. No. 5. Pp. 7–39. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2023_5_7_39. EDN: BXIKUF.
  3. Demir E.M. On the Current Situation of Creative Industries in Turkey // Etkileşim. 2022. № 9. Pp. 224–239. DOI: 10.32739/etkilesim.2022.5.9.162.
  4. Kim S. Aggressive Yet Benign: Korea’s Engagement in Creative Industries in Africa // International Journal of Cultural Policy. Vol. 26. № 7. Pp. 929–941. DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2020.1828383.
  5. Scott A. Hollywood and the World: The Geography of Motion-Picture Distribution and Marketing // Review of International Political Economy. 2004. Vol. 11. № 1. Pp. 33–61.
  6. Lee H.-K. Introduction: Understanding of the Cultural and Creative Industries in Asia // Lim L., Lee H.-K. (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Cultural and Creative Industries in Asia. London and New York: Routledge, 2019. 24–39.
  7. Newsinger J.A. A Cultural Shock Doctrine? Austerity, the Neoliberal State and the Creative Industries Discourse // Media, Culture & Society. 2015. Vol. 37. № 2. 302–313.
  8. Beirne M. et al. Autonomy and Resilience in Cultural Work: Looking Beyond the ‘Creative Industries’ // Journal for Cultural Research. 2017. Vol. 21. № 2. DOI: 10.1080/14797585.2016.1275311.
  9. Flew T., Cunningham S. Creative Industries after the First Decade of Debate // The Information Society: An International Journal. 2010. Vol. 26. № 2. Pp. 113–123. DOI: 10.1080/01972240903562753.
  10. Oyama S. In the closet: Japanese Creative Industries and their Reluctance to Forge Global and Transnational Linkages in ASEAN and East Asia // ERIA Discussion Paper Series. 2019. Vol. 295. Pp. 1–25.
  11. Jin D.Y. The Korean Government’s New Cultural Policy in the Age of Social Media // Kawashima N., Lee H.-K. (eds.). Asian Cultural Flows: Cultural Policies, Creative Industries, and Media Consumers. Singapore: Springer, 2020. Pp. 3–17.
  12. Otmazgin N. State Intervention Does Not Support the Development of the Media Sector: Lessons from Korea and Japan // Global Policy. 2020. Vol. 11. № S2. Pp. 40–46. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12821.
  13. McGray D. Japan’s Gross National Cool // Foreign Policy. Vol. 130. Pp. 44–54. DOI: 10.2307/3183487.
  14. Paksiutov G.D. Economic Contribution of Japan’s Content Industry // Japanese Studies in Russia. 2019. No. 1. Pp. 51–72. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2500-2872-2019-10004. EDN: ZCWHWX.
  15. Steinberg M. The Platform Economy: How Japan Transformed the Consumer Internet. Minneapolis and London: Minnesota University Press, 2019.
  16. Matsui T. Nation branding through stigmatized popular culture: The «Cool Japan» craze among central ministries in Japan // Hitotsubashi Journal of Commerce and Management. 2014. Vol. 48. № 1. Pp. 81–97.
  17. Rubinshtein A.Ya. Creative Economy of the Paternalistic State: What Does the Coming Day Hold for Us? // Journal of the New Economic Association. 2022. Vol. 54. No. 2. Pp. 209–212. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2022-54-2-11. EDN:
  18. Kawashima N. ‘Cool Japan’ and Creative Industries: An Evaluation of Economic Policies for Popular Culture Industries in Japan // Asian Cultural Flows: Cultural Policies, Creative Industries, and Media Consumers. Pp. 18–36.
  19. Kwon S., Kim J. The cultural industry policies of the Korean government and the Korean Wave // International Journal of Cultural Policy. 2014. Vol. 20. № 4. 422–439. DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2013.829052.
  20. Jin D.Y. Construction of Digital Korea: The Evolution of New Communication Technologies in the 21st Century // Media, Culture & Society. 2017. Vol. 39. № 5. 715–726. DOI: 10.1177/0163443717709441.
  21. Jung S. Korean Masculinities and Transcultural Consumption: Yonsama, Rain, Oldboy, K-pop Idols. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2011.
  22. Lee H.-K., Lim L. Culture, Digitalization and Diversity: Asian Perspectives // Routledge Handbook of Cultural and Creative Industries in Asia. Pp. 527–547.
  23. Kim Y. Sell Your Loneliness: Mukbang Culture and Multisensorial Capitalism in South Korea // Routledge Handbook of Cultural and Creative Industries in Asia. Pp. 363–382.
  24. Putnam R.D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000.
  25. Kistanov V.O. Relations between Japan and South Korea: Problems, Trends, Perspectives // Japanese Studies in Russia. 2019. No. 3. Pp. 33–48. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2500-2872 2019-10019. EDN: VNXHTQ.
  26. Chua B.H., Iwabuchi K. Introduction // Chua B.H., Iwabuchi K. (eds.). East Asian Pop Culture: Analyzing the Korean Wave. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2008. Pp. 1–12.
  27. Toshiyuki B. Changes in International Competition Regarding Auto-parts in China, Korea, and Japan // Journal of International Economic Studies. 2016. Vol. 30. Pp. 27–40. DOI: 10.15002/00012843.
  28. Bown C.P. How the United States Marched the Semiconductor Industry into its Trade War with China // East Asian Economic Review. 2020. Vol. 24. № 4. Pр. 349–388. DOI: 10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2020.24.4.384.
  29. Gnyavali D.R., Park B.-J. Co-opetition Between Giants: Collaboration with Competitors for Technological Innovation // Research Policy. 2011. Vol. 40. № 5. Pp. 650–663.
  30. Kuwahara Y. Introduction // Kuwahara Y. (ed.). The Korean Wave: Korean Popular Culture in Global Context. New York: Pulgrave Macmillan, 2014. Pp. 1–12.
  31. Shin S., Balistreri J. The Other Trade War: Quantifying the Korea-Japan Trade Dispute // Journal of Asian Economics. 2022. Vol. 79. DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2022.101442.
  32. Hoskins C., Mirus R. Reasons for the US Dominance of the International Trade in Television Industry // Media, Culture & Society. 1988, Vol. 10. № 4. Pp. 499–515.
  33. Takara Y. Do Cultural Differences Affect the Trade of Cultural Goods? A Study of Trade in Music // Journal of Cultural Economics. 2017. Vol. 42. №. 3. Pp. 393–417.
  34. Holloway I.R. Foreign Entry, Quality, and Cultural Distance: Product-Level Evidence from US Movie Exports // Review of World Economics. 2014. Vol. 150. Pp. 371-392. DOI: 10.1007/s10290-013-0180-3.
  35. Kuwahara Y. Hanryu: Korean Popular Culture in Japan // The Korean Wave: Korean Popular Culture in Global Context. Pp. 213–222.
  36. Iwabuchi K. Recentering Globalization: Popular Culture and Japanese Transnationalism. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2002.
  37. Бурдье П. Формы капитала // Экономическая социология. Т. 3. № 5. С. 60–74. [Bourdieu P. Forms of Capital // Economic Sociology. 2002. Vol. 3. No. 5. Pp. 60–74. (In Russ.)].
  38. de Valck M. Film Festivals: From European Geopolitics to Global Cinephilia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007.
  39. Paksiutov G.D. «Soft Power» and «Cultural Capital» of Nations: The Case of Film Industry // World Economy and International Relations. 2020. Vol. 64. No. 11. Pp. 106–113. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-11-106-113. EDN: HWSIJI.
  40. Rubinshtein A.Ya., Burakov N.A. Cultural Economics. Moscow: Studio School Moscow Art Academic Theater, State Institute of Art Studies, 2024. (In Russ.). EDN: GHRTJJ.

Manuscript submission date: 20.04.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 30.06.2025

 

For citation:

Paksiutov G.D. Japan and South Korea’s Creative Industries: Competition and the Prospects of Cooperation// Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 3. Pp. 181-198. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_181_198  EDN: ZBVZUK

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 3/2025. World Economy. 

Dostonbek U. Samandarov

PhD student at the Academy of Public Policy and Administration under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan

 

FOREIGN EXPERIENCE IN FINANCING THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM

Размер файла199-212 Размер файла  395.93 KB Размер файла Full text

This article analyzes international experiences in financing healthcare systems, conducts a study of various healthcare financing models in developed countries. The sources of financing the health care system and ways to ensure its financial sustainability, as well as the level of accessibility of medical services for the population in Sweden, Germany, Austria and South Korea are considered.

According to the research findings, there is no single perfect model; rather, each country must approach healthcare financing based on its economic and demographic conditions.

Keywords: healthcare system, financing, Beveridge model, Bismarck model, health insurance, international experience.

JEL: I18, H51

EDN: ZRUZWK

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_199_212

References

  1. Janlöv N., Blume S., Glenngård A. H., Hanspers K., Anell A., & Merkur, S. Sweden: Health System Review. Health systems in transition. 2023. No. 25 (4). Pp. 1–236.
  2. Carlsson P. Priority setting in health care: Swedish efforts and experiences // Scand JPublic Health. 2010, Aug. No. 38 (6). Pp. 561–564. DOI: 10.1177/140349 48103 77406.
  3. Nutan Shashi Tigga, Vikash R. Keshri. Changing perspectives of public health in India: the growing role of health economics: [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] // Gates Open Research. London (Feb. 3, 2020). DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13109.1.
  4. Reinhardt U.E. The many different prices paid to providers and the flawed theory of cost shifting: Is it time for a more rational all-payer system? // Health Affairs. 2011. No. 30 (11). Pp. 2125–2133.
  5. Blümel M., Spranger A., Achstetter K., Maresso A., Litvinova Y., Busse R. Germany: Health system summary, 2022 // European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/publications/i/germany-healthsystemsummary-2022
  6. Omelyanovsky V.V., Maksimova L.V., Tatarinov A.P. Foreign experience: models of financing and organization of healthcare systems // Financial Journal. 2014. No. 3 (21). Pp. 22–34. (In Russ.).

Manuscript submission date: 02.04.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 30.06.2025

 

For citation:

Samandarov D.U. Foreign Experience in Financing the Healthcare System // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 3. Pp. 199-212. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_199_212 EDN: ZRUZWK

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 3/2025. World Economy. 

Olga D. Ismagilova

Researcher of the Institute for International Economics and Finance, Russian Foreign Trade Academy, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-3092-770X

 

Veronika N. Popova

Researcher of the Institute for International Economics and Finance, Russian Foreign Trade Academy, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-7931-850X

 

ANALYSIS OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR RUSSIA AND KAZAKHSTAN COOPERATION ON VALUE CHAINS DEVELOPMENT IN THE METALLURGICAL INDUSTRY

Размер файла161-180  Размер файла  330.68 KB Размер файла Full text

The article examines the main characteristics of countries’ participation in global value chains, key types, and the extent of their influence on world trade. There is an analysis of Russian and Kazakhstan participation in global value chains as well as the share of foreign added value in the metallurgical industry of Russia and Kazakhstan. The current figures of trade and economic interaction of both countries, including their cooperation in the investment sphere are regarded. Particular attention is paid to the study of metallurgical industry of Kazakhstan as one of the priority directions of industrial production as well as statistics of export and import of specific products of mining and metallurgical sector of Kazakhstan. The article also considers the prospects of Russian and Kazakhstan cooperation expansion in the steel industry, and identifies specific metallurgical goods for which Russia has untapped export potential in the Kazakhstan market.

Keywords: Russia, Kazakhstan, metallurgical industry, export, import, global value chains, forward and backward participation, industry production, resources, critical goods.

JEL: F49, P23, P33

EDN: WNQBCE

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_161_180

References

  1. Trade policy implications of global value chains (OECD). https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2019/11/trade-policy-implications-of-globalvalue-chains_f182d1f5/4989ef9e-en.pdf
  2. Borinm A., Mancini M., Taglioni D. Economic consequences of trade and global value chain Integration. A Measurement Perspective (World bank group), September 2021. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/476361632831927312/pdf/Economic-Consequences-of-Trade-and-Global-Value-Chain-Integration-A-Measurement-Perspective.pdf
  3. Nur C., Inmaculada M.-Z. The impact of global value chain participation on income inequality. International Economics, Vol. 169, May 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.inteco.2022.02.002.
  4. Global value chain development report 2023: Resilient and sustainable GVCs in turbulent times. Research Institute for Global Value Chains at the University of International Business and Economics, ADB, the Institute of Developing Economies – Japan External Trade Organization and the WTO, 2023. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gvc_dev_rep23_e.pdf
  5. Ralph Ossa. Pillar of economic security (International Monetary Fund).
  6. Fernandes A., Hiau Looi Kee, Deborah Winkler. Determinants of Global Value Chain Participation Cross-Country Evidence. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/930751585234915451/pdf/Determinants-of-Global-Value-Chain-Participation-Cross-Country-Evidence.pdf
  7. Trade in Value Added and Global Value Chains Country profiles explanatory notes (WTO) https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/miwi_e/explanatory_notes_e.pdf.
  8. Nebojša Stojčić, Matija Matić. A journey toward global value chain upgrading: Exploring the transition from backward to forward integration. Technology in Society, Vol. 76. March 2024. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160791X23002403.
  9. Interconnected Economies Benefiting from Global value chains (OECD). https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/interconnected-economies_9789264189560-en.html
  10. Josephine Wuri, Tri Widodo, Amirullah Setya Hardi. Speed of convergence in global value chains: Forward or backward linkage. Heliyon. Vol. 9. Iss. 7. July 2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023052787
  11. Koen De Backer, Sébastien Miroudot. Mapping Global Value Chains. OECD Trade Policy Papers No. 159. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/ publications/reports/2013/12/ mapping-global-value-chains_g17a2429/5k3v1trgnbr4-en.pdf
  12. Navarro О. Features of value-added chains in metallurgy and metalworking in Russia. http://edoc.bseu.by:8080/bitstream/edoc/102045/1/Navarro_119_126.pdf
  13. Mineral commodity summaries. U.S Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2023. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2023/mcs2023.pdf (accessed: 15.01.2025).
  14. Mining Sector Diagnostics – Kazakhstan. (The World Bank), February, 2023. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099081823001511076/
    pdf/P176745032752e020ab830aca3807b2afc.pdf (accessed: 20.02.2025). (In Russ).

Manuscript submission date: 13.02.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 30.06.2025

 

For citation:

Ismagilova O.D., Popova V.N. Analysis of Opportunities for Russia and Kazakhstan Cooperation on Value Chains Development in the Metallurgical Industry // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 3. Pp. 161-180. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_161_180 EDN: WNQBCE

  Creative Commons 4.0

© Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2021 - 2024

32, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, Moscow, Russia 117218, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Phone.: +7 (499) 724-13-91, E-mail: vestnik-ieran@inecon.ru