The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 4/2026. Finance.

.xmlJATS XML

Dmitry M. Kruk

Postgraduate Student of the Department of World Economy, Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia;

Employee of the Global Markets Department, Moscow Branch of Sberbank of Russia, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0009-0001-7463-2065

 

THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES ON THE TRANSFORMATION OF KEY ELEMENTS OF FINANCIAL ARCHITECTURE

Размер файла118-133
Размер файла  319.02 KB  Размер файла Full text

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the convergence of innovative financial technologies driving the transformation of the global financial architecture (GFA) in the 2020–2026 period. Based on systematized data from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Financial Stability Board (FSB), and the World Economic Forum (WEF), three key technological vectors are examined: tokenization of real-world assets (RWA), central bank digital currencies (CBDC), and the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the financial sector. The author’s contribution consists of a quantitative verification of factors determining the CBDC implementation stage, using panel data from 85 countries for the 2020–2024 period with ordered logistic regression. The study finds that cryptocurrency penetration, quality of the regulatory environment, and financial sector depth significantly increase the probability of a country advancing to a more developed CBDC project stage. It was found that the intensity of institutional response–the adoption of the MiCA regulation in the EU and the GENIUS Act in the US–is a valid indica-tor of the transformative impact of platform solutions on financial institutions.

Keywords: global financial architecture, real-world asset tokenization, central bank digital currencies, CBDC, blockchain, artificial intelligence, stablecoins, DeFi, MiCA, cross-border payments.

JEL: E42, F33, G18, G23, O33

EDN: MUIEHB

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2026_4_118_133

References

  1. Schumpeter J.A. The Theory of Economic Development. Moscow: Progress, 1982. (In Russ.).
  2. Merton R.C. Continuous-Time Finance. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.
  3. Minsky H.P. The Financial Instability Hypothesis // Hyman P. Minsky Archive, Paper 144. 1992.
  4. World Economic Forum. Asset Tokenization in Financial Markets: The Next Generation of Value Exchange. Geneva: WEF, 2025.
  5. BCG, Ripple. Approaching the Tokenization Tipping Point. Boston: BCG, 2025.
  6. Kochergin D.A., Andryushin S.A. Digital Assets, Crypto Assets and Digital Currencies: Economic Substance and Convergence Potential // St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies. Economics. 2023. Vol. 39. No. 4. Pp. 496–533. (In Russ.). EDN: NDQERM. DOI: 10.21638/spbu05.2023.403.
  7. International Monetary Fund. Tokenization and Financial Market Inefficiencies. IMF Fintech Note. Washington: IMF, 2025.
  8. Bank for International Settlements. Advancing in Tandem: Results of the 2024 BIS Survey on Central Bank Digital Currencies and Crypto (BIS Papers No. 159). Basel: BIS, 2025.
  9. Andryushin S.A. Central Bank Digital Currency as the Third Form of State Money // Actual Problems of Economics and Law. 2021. Vol. 15. No. 1. Pp. 54–76. (In Russ.). EDN: MCEDZP. DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.15.2021.1.54-76.
  10. Kochergin D.A. Modern Models of Central Bank Digital Currency Systems // St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies. Economics. 2021. Vol. 37. No. 2. Pp. 205–240. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21638/spbu05.2021.202.
  11. International Monetary Fund. Central Bank Digital Currency: Progress and Further Considerations (Policy Paper PP/2024/052). Washington: IMF, 2024.
  12. Bank for International Settlements Innovation Hub. Project mBridge: Connecting Economies through CBDC. Basel: BIS, 2022.
  13. Данилова Е.А., Маслов А.В. Цифровые валюты в международных расчетах: проект mBridge // ЭКО. 2024. Т. 54. № 3. С. 80–112. [Danilova E.A., Maslov A.V. Digital Currencies in International Settlements: the mBridge Project // ECO. 2024. Vol. 54. No. 3. Pp. 80–112. (In Russ.).] DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2024-3-80-112.
  14. Kochergin D.A., Andryushin S.A. Prospects for International Settlements with Central Bank Digital Currencies on a Platform Basis in Foreign Countries and Russia // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2024. Vol. 16. No. 4. Pp. 8–28. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2024-4-8-28. EDN: MCEDZP
  15. McKinsey Global Institute. The State of AI: How Organizations Are Rewiring to Capture Value. New York: McKinsey, 2025.
  16. Guo Y., Yousef E., Naseer M.M. Cryptocurrencies and Central Bank Digital Currencies in Global Perspective // Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2025. Vol. 18. No 11. Art. 644. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm18110644.
  17. Mertzanis C., Shaker Ahmed M., Faisal R., Al Suwaidi R.A. Does Financial Literacy Drive Digital Currency Innovation? Cross-Country Evidence on CBDC Adoption // Borsa Istanbul Review. 2025. Vol. 25. Pp. 109–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.bir.2025.08.006.
  18. Bank for International Settlements. Annual Economic Report 2025. Basel: BIS, 2025.
  19. Bank for International Settlements. The Next Generation Monetary and Financial System // Annual Economic Report 2025. Chapter III. Basel: BIS, 2025.
  20. International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO). Tokenization of Financial Assets. FR/17/25. Madrid: IOSCO, 2025.
  21. Financial Stability Board. The Financial Stability Implications of Tokenisation. Basel: FSB, 2024.
  22. International Monetary Fund. Financial Access Survey: Fintech, a Catalyst for Financial Services Access, Innovation, and Growth. Washington: IMF, 2025.
  23. Chiu J., Davoodalhosseini S.M., Jiang J., Zhu Y. Bank Market Power and Central Bank Digital Currency: Theory and Quantitative Assessment // Journal of Political Economy. 2023. Vol. 131. No 5. Pp. 1213–1248. DOI: 10.1086/722517

Manuscript submission date: 08.06.2026

Manuscript acceptance date: 13.08.2026

 

For citation:

Kruk D.M. The impact of digital technologies on the transformation of key elements of financial architecture // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2026. № 4. Pp. 118-133. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2026_4_118_133 EDN: MUIEHB

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 4/2026. Finance.

.xmlJATS XML

Victoria A. Bannikova

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Junior Researcher, Mathematical Modeling of Economic Processes Department, Institute of Applied Economic Research, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-2140-3875

 

MARKER GOODS OF INFLATION ATTENTION: CHANGES IN THEIR CATEGORIES AND TYPES UNDER THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY, 2014–2026

Размер файла96-117
Размер файла  409.87 KB  Размер файла Full text

The article analyzes changes in the population’s attention to information related to inflation for the periods from 2014 to 2021 and 2022 to 2026. Based on the results of a study conducted using regularization and control function methods on data from Internet queries on the topic of “inflation” and Russian statistics, it is shown that in 2014–2021, the leading marker goods were petroleum products and food products (meat, fish, dairy products), while in 2022–2026 importance of several food products (meat, fish) decreased, while the importance of import-dependent non-food products (clothing, knitwear, tobacco products, printed products) increased. Categories with a negative price–attention relationship (medical goods, footwear, construction materials, public catering) are identified, which is explained by limited availability of these goods and, consequently, limited attention to inflation in these categories, postponed consumption, and substitution with cheaper alter-natives. Monitoring marker goods of inflation attention growth is essential for anchoring expectations and improving inflation targeting effectiveness.

Keywords: inflation attention, marker goods, Internet queries, consumer price index.

JEL: D12, E31, E52

EDN: HTLAKC

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2026_4_96_117

Financial support: The article was written on the basis of the RANEPA state assignment research programme.

References

  1. Grishchenko V. et al. Identification of marker goods and the impact of their prices on inflation expectations of Russian households // Bank of Russia. Economic Research Report Series. 2023. No. 117. (In Russ.).
  2. Kilian L., Zhou X. The impact of rising oil prices on US inflation and inflation expectations in 2020–23 // Energy Economics. 2022. Vol. 113. Article. 106228. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106228.
  3. Lucas R.E. – Jr. An equilibrium model of the business cycle // Journal of political economy. 1975. Vol. 83. No. 6. Pp. 1113–1144. DOI: 10.1086/260386.
  4. Lucas R.E. – Jr. Some international evidence on output-inflation tradeoffs // The American economic review. 1973. Vol. 63. No. 3. Pp. 326–334. DOI: 10.2307/1818318.
  5. Sims C.A. Implications of rational inattention // Journal of monetary Economics. 2003. Vol. 50. No. 3. Pp. 665–690. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00029-1.
  6. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty // Science. 1974. Vol. 185. No. 4157. Pp. 1124–1131. DOI: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
  7. Campbell S.D., Sharpe S.A. Anchoring bias in consensus forecasts and its effect on market prices // Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2009. Vol. 44. No. 2. Pp. 369–390. DOI: 10.1017/S0022109009090127.
  8. Thaler R.H., Shefrin H.M. An economic theory of self-control // Journal of political Economy. 1981. Vol. 89. No. 2. Pp. 392-406. DOI: 10.1086/260971.
  9. Cavallo A., Cruces G., Perez-Truglia R. Inflation expectations, learning, and supermarket prices: Evidence from survey experiments // American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. 2017. Vol. 9. No. 3. Pp. 1–35. DOI: 10.1257/mac.20150147.
  10. Evans G.W., Honkapohja S. Learning and expectations in macroeconomics. Princeton University Press, 2001. DOI: 10.1515/9781400824267.
  11. Hansen L.P., Sargent T.J. Robust control and model uncertainty // American Economic Review. 2001. Vol. 91. No. 2. Pp. 60-66. DOI: 10.1257/aer.91.2.60.
  12. Qin L., Sidiropoulos M., Spyromitros E. Robust monetary policy under uncertainty about central bank preferences // Bulletin of Economic Research. 2010. Vol. 62. No. 2. Pp. 197–208. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8586.2009.00324.x.
  13. Coibion O., Gorodnichenko Y. Is the Phillips curve alive and well after all? Inflation expectations and the missing disinflation // American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. 2015. Vol. 7. No. 1. Pp. 197–232. DOI: 10.1257/mac.20130306.
  14. D’Acunto F. et al. Exposure to grocery prices and inflation expectations // Journal of Political Economy. 2021. Vol. 129. No. 5. Pp. 1615–1639. DOI: 10.1086/713192.
  15. Matinyan A. et al. The role of information in shaping inflation expectations and perceptions: A survey experiment // Journal of Macroeconomics. 2026. Article 103754. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2026.103754.
  16. Armantier O. et al. Measuring inflation expectations // Annual Review of Economics. 2013. Vol. 5. No. 1. Pp. 273–301. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-economics-081512-141510.
  17. Kmetz A., Shapiro A.H., Wilson D.J. Can the news drive inflation expectations // FRBSF Economic letter. 2022. Vol. 2022. No. 31. Pp. 1–6. https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedfel/95086.html
  18. Goloshchapova I.O., Andreev M.L. Estimation of inflation expectations of the Russian population using machine learning methods // Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2017. No. 6. Pp. 71–93. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-6-71-93.
  19. Buelens C. Googling ‘inflation’: Household inflation attention across the euro area // European Journal of Political Economy. 2025. Vol. 89. Article. 102702. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102702.
  20. Petrova D.A. Estimating inflation expectations based on Internet data // Applied Econometrics. 2022. Vol. 66. No. 2. Pp. 25–38. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/1993-7601-2022-66-25-38.
  21. Evstigneeva A., Karpov D. The impact of negative news on the public’s perception of inflation // Bank of Russia. Economic Research Report Series. 2023. No. 111. (In Russ.).
  22. Evstigneeva A., Snegireva O., Beloglazova I. Key narratives of Russian society on inflation, the economy, and the key rate: A grounded theory approach in sociology // Bank of Russia. Economic Research Report Series. 2026. No. 166. (In Russ.).
  23. Bracha A., Tang J. Inflation levels and (in) attention // Review of Economic Studies. 2025. Vol. 92. No. 3. Pp. 1564–1594. DOI: 10.1093/restud/rdae063.
  24. Guillochon J., ter Ellen S. Inflation concern, attention and central bank trust // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2025. Vol. 239. Article. 107268. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107268.
  25. Tikhonov A.N. On the solution of incorrectly stated problems and a method of regularization // Reports of the Academy of Sciences. 1963. Vol. 151. No. 3. Pp. 501–504. (In Russ.). https://www.mathnet.ru/links/aca76b48e09c6192a9001ac1108f15de/dan28329.pdf (дата обращения: 09.06.2026).
  26. Hoerl A.E., Kennard R.W. Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems // Technometrics. 1970. Vol. 12. No. 1. Pp. 55–67. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634.
  27. Efron B., Tibshirani R.J. An introduction to the bootstrap (1st ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. DOI: 10.1201/9780429246593.
  28. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso // Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. 1996. Vol. 58. No. 1. Pp. 267–288. DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x.
  29. Novikov D. Consumer inflation expectations in Russia and the US: Testing the diagnostic expectations hypothesis // Money and Credit. 2026. Vol. 85. No. 1. Pp. 35–62. (In Russ.).
  30. Wooldridge J.M. Control function methods in applied econometrics // Journal of Human resources. 2015. Vol. 50. No. 2. Pp. 420–445. DOI: 10.3368/jhr.50.2.420.

Manuscript submission date: 12.06.2026

Manuscript acceptance date: 13.08.2026

 

For citation:

Bannikova V.A. Marker goods of inflation attention: changes in their categories and types under the transformation of the Russian economy, 2014–2026 // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2026. № 4. Pp. 96-117. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2026_4_96_117 EDN: HTLAKC

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 2/2026. Finance.

.xmlJATS XML

Ekaterina E. Melkova

Master’s Student, Department of State Regulation of the Economy of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia

 

MECHANISMS FOR FINE-TUNING MONETARY POLICY AS A TOOL FOR STIMULATING STRUCTURAL SHIFTS IN THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY

Размер файла45-65
Размер файла  811.5 KB  Размер файла Full text

The purpose of this article is a comprehensive analysis of the current state, problems and potential of the monetary policy of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation as a financial mechanism to stimulate the structural modernization of the Russian economy, which began in 2022. It is shown that the tight monetary policy implemented in 2022–2025 in order to ensure the key macroeconomic prerequisite for structural transformation – price stability, has made it difficult for companies to access national investment resources. The article substantiates the need to activate a selective monetary policy based on fine-tuning mechanisms that can stimulate the development of priority sectors and industries of the economy, which are currently underutilized. Various options for forming an effective channel for supporting targeted economic activities using these mechanisms are being considered and evaluated. The author concludes that the mechanism for refinancing state development institutions based on taxonomy projects is promising and suggests ways to improve it.

Keywords: monetary policy, mechanisms for fine-tuning monetary policy, special refinancing instruments, inflation targeting, structural economic development, targeted project emission, development institutions.

JEL: E52, E58

EDN: SLNJOD

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2026_2_45_65

References

  1. Galushka A.S., Niyazmetov A.K. Using escrow accounts and target project emissions as a non-inflationary method of financing investment projects // Business Strategies. 2019. No. 3. Pp. 3–10. (In Russ.).
  2. Glazyev S. Yu., Sukharev O.S. Economic growth and monetary policy in Russia // Journal of New Economy. 2025. Vol. 26. No. 1. Pp. 6–30. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2025-26-1-1.
  3. Golovnin M.Y. The role of Central bank policy in ensuring dynamic economic development in Russia // Scientific Papers of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2025. Vol. 253. No. 3. Pp. 153–164. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.38197/2072-2060-2025-253-3-153-164.
  4. Kolesnik S.I., Kartaev P.S., Zubarev A.V. Asymmetry of the Bank of Russia’s monetary policy: Effects on macroeconomic indicators // Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2025. No. 10. Pp. 44–61. (In Russ.).
  5. Lapaev D.N., Ramazanov S.S. Interest channel and innovative mechanisms of the Bank of Russia // Economic security. 2024. Vol. 7. No. 2. Pp. 247–264. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/ecsec.7.2.120586.
  6. B., AkhapkinN.Y., Filatov V.I., et al. Structural modernization of the Russian economy: conditions, directions, mechanisms. St. Petersburg: Aleteya Publishing House, 2022. (In Russ.).
  7. Medvedev I.D., Solntsev O.G. Monetary Policy of the Bank of Russia in the Conditions of Structural Transformation of the Economy // Scientific works: Institute of Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 6–28. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47711/2076-3182-2023-2-6-28.
  8. The main directions of the unified state monetary policy for 2026 and the period 2027 and 2028. Approved by the Board of Directors of the Bank of Russia on 24.10.2025. Moscow: Bank of Russia, 2025. (In Russ.).
  9. The main directions of development of the financial market of the Russian Federation for 2026 and the period 2027 and 2028. Approved by the Board of Directors of the Bank of Russia. Moscow: Bank of Russia. 2025. (In Russ.).
  10. Rubinstein A.A. On the issue of reducing the key interest rate // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2025. No. 4. Pp. 125–149. (In Russ.).
  11. Filatov V.I. Financial Resources for the Growth of the Russian Economy // The world of new economy. 2021. No. 15 (2). Pp. 97–106. (In Russ.).
  12. Borio C., Hofmann B. Is monetary policy less effective when interest rates are persistently low? // BIS Working Papers, 2017. No. 628.
  13. Debortoli D., Forni M., Gambetti L., Sala L. Asymmetric effects of monetary policy easing and tightening. Barcelona GSE Working Paper Series, 2020. No. 1205.
  14. Igityan H. Asymmetric Effects of Monetary Policy on the Armenian Economy. Russian Journal of Money and Finance. 2021. 80 (1). Pp. 46–103. DOI: 10.31477/rjmf.202101.46.
  15. Perez-Orive A., Timmer Y., van der Ghote A. The asymmetric credit channel of monetary policy. Unpublished manuscript, American Economic Association. 2023.
  16. Ülke V., Berument M.H. Asymmetric effects of monetary policy shocks on economic performance: empirical evidence from Turkey. Applied Economics Letters. 2016. No. 23 (5). Pp. 353–360.

Manuscript submission date: 10.02.2026

Manuscript acceptance date: 02.04.2026

 

For citation:

Melkova E.E. Mechanisms for fine-tuning monetary policy as a tool for stimulating structural shifts in the Russian economy // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2026. №. 2. Pp. 45-65. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2026_2_45_65 EDN: SLNJOD

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 4/2026. Finance.

.xmlJATS XML

Aleksandr V. Milenkov

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Global Financial Markets and Fintech, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-7812-2348

 

Svetlana V. Frumina

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Global Financial Markets and Fintech, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia;

Associate Professor of the Department of Public Finance, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-5143-9417

 

AI-DRIVEN FINANCIAL ADVISORY: FROM OVERCOMING INFORMATION ASYMMETRY TO NEW RISKS AND REGULATORY CHALLENGES

Размер файла70-95 
Размер файла  625.9 KB  Размер файла Full text

The article analyzes the Bank of Russia’s initiative to create a specialized AI agent for selecting financial products, which was announced in April 2026. It examines architectural and regulatory approaches to implementing agentic systems in financial advisory services. Based on a synthesis of international and Russian research, the study explores the economic nature of AI intermediation as a mechanism for overcoming information asymmetry, which simultaneously creates new challenges: technical vulnerabilities of algorithms, institutional risks, user interest manipulation, market latency, and the problem of liability distribution. Special attention is paid to the evolution of regulatory approaches abroad, the identification of factors determining the success of agentic systems implementation, as well as the analysis of international precedents. The author proposes a classification of maturity levels for AI financial intermediaries. Recommendations are formulated for the governance of the AI agent aimed at balancing technological autonomy, fiduciary responsibility, and competitive neutrality.

Keywords: artificial intelligence, AI agent, financial advisory, information asymmetry, Bank of Russia, AI technical risks, behavioral risks, market latency, responsibility for AI recommendations.

JEL: G18, G23, G28, O33

EDN: HICHNS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2026_4_70_95  

References

  1. Abramova M.A., Dubova S.E. Turbulence of threats to financial stability in the new realities of the development of monetary and payment systems // Banking Services. 2022. No. 7. Pp. 9–18. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.36992/2075-1915_2022_7_9. EDN: ZRYZLM.
  2. Abramova M.A., Krivoruchko S.V., Lunyakov O.V., Fiapshev A.B. Theoretical and methodological perspective on the prerequisites of emergence and peculiarities of the functioning of decentralized finance // Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025. Vol. 29. No. 1. Pp. 80–96. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-1-80-96. EDN: QICSEA.
  3. Afanasyeva O.N., Sapozhnikov D.A. Evolution of scientific ideas about financial intermediation // Finance and Credit. 2025. Vol. 31. No. 12. Pp. 35–52. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24891/fc.31.12.35. EDN: LJQEHF.
  4. Dolmatovich I.A., Keshenkova N.V. Neural networks: application and prospects of use in the activities of commercial banks // Savings Business Abroad. 2024. No. 2. Pp. 41–52. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.36992/2782-5949_2024_2_41. EDN: AELGQM.
  5. Kiselev A.S. On some opportunities for applying artificial intelligence technologies in banking to ensure technological sovereignty // Banking Law. 2026. No. 1. Pp. 57–66. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18572/1812-3945-2026-1-57-66. EDN: CNGEQK.
  6. Kochergin D.A. Main trends in the use of artificial intelligence in the financial sector // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2025. No. 6. Pp. 147–169. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2025_6_147_169. EDN: EQJOKW.
  7. Krinichansky K.V., Annenskaya N.E. The concept and prospects of financial development // Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2022. No. 10. Pp. 20–36. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2022-10-20-36. EDN: IKUSTF.
  8. Simaeva E.P., Simaeva N.P. Legal mechanisms and behavioral economics: instruments for regulating the savings market // Economics, Taxes & Law. 2025. Vol. 18. No. 4. Pp. 172–179. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-4-172-179. EDN: PCOVGA.
  9. Trachenko M.B., Starodubtseva E.B., Kozhanova A.V. A new crowdfunding model to protect investors interests in Russia // Lomonosov Economics Journal. 2023. Vol. 58. No. 1. Pp. 45–62. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.38050/MSU01300105-6-58-1-3. EDN: DQEZBT.
  10. Khominich I.P., Frumina S.V. et al. Money, finance, banking, insurance in the digital era: understanding transformations, risks, markets, financial institutions / Ed. By I.P. Khominich, S.V. Frumina. Moscow: Rusains, 2023. (In Russ.). EDN: UMOTRJ.
  11. Cherdakov O.I. The attitude of the state and business towards the development and implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in the Russian financial sector and economy // Banking Law. 2022. No. 5. Pp. 40–47. (In Russ.). EDN: STQJFS.
  12. Diamond D.W. Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring // The Review of Economic Studies. 1984. No. 51 (3). Pp. 393–414.
  13. Feng R., Li H., Liu M. Robo-Advisors Beyond Automation: Principles and Roadmap for AI-Driven Financial Planning // arXiv:2509.09922. 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09922 (accessed: 15.04.2026).
  14. Hagiu A., Wright J. Multi-Sided Platforms // International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2015. Vol. 43. Pp. 162–174.
  15. Inderst R., Ottaviani M. Misselling through Agents // American Economic Review. 2009. Vol. 99. No. 3. Pp. 883–908. DOI: 10.1257/aer.99.3.883.
  16. Li S., Shen W. Confronting AI-Induced Power Disparity and Emotional Disruption: Expansive Duties of Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers // Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business. 2024. Vol. 45. No. 1. P. 31.
  17. Packin N.G., Kliger D., Reichman A., Rabinovitz S. Hooked and Hustled: The Predatory Allure of Gamblified Finance // Columbia Business Law Review. 2025. Vol. 2025. No. 1.
  18. Rochet J.C., Tirole J. Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets // Journal of the European Economic Association. 2003. Vol. 1. No. 4. Pp. 990–1029.
  19. Teplova T., Tomtosov A., Sokolova T. A Retail Investor in a Cobweb of Social Networks // PLOS ONE. 2022. Vol. 17. No. 12. P. e0276924. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276924.
  20. Wang W. Regulating Algorithmic Accountability in Financial Advising // CLS Blue Sky Blog. 2025. June 4. https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/2025/06/04/regulatingalgorithmic-accountability-in-financial-advising/ (accessed: 18.04.2026).

Manuscript submission date: 08.06.2026

Manuscript acceptance date: 13.08.2026

 

For citation:

Milenkov A.V., Frumina S.V. AI-driven financial advisory: from overcoming information asymmetry to new risks and regulatory challenges // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2026. № 4. Pp. 70-95. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2026_4_70_95 EDN: HICHNS

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 2/2026. Finance.

.xmlJATS XML

Sergey A. Perekhod

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Head of the “Fininvest” Laboratory, Associate Professor of the Department of Financial Markets and Financial Engineering, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-4606-1226

 

Vladislav V. Velichko

Researcher, “Fininvest” Laboratory, Faculty of Finance, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

 

Anastasiia N. Kovalenko

Researcher, “Fininvest” Laboratory, Faculty of Finance, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

 

THE IMPACT OF MACROECONOMIC POLICY ON THE CAPITALIZATION OF THE RUSSIAN STOCK MARKET

Размер файла28-44
Размер файла  685.03 KB  Размер файла Full text

This article investigates the impact of macroeconomic policy on the capitalization of the Russian stock market under conditions of liquidity segmentation, impaired arbitrage, and shifts in investor composition following 2022. The objective of this study is to refine the transmission mechanism of monetary and fiscal impulses to the market capitalization of public companies, accounting for institutional constraints. The methodological framework is grounded in a synthesis of macro-financial literature, a comparative analysis of international empirical findings against Russian specificities, and a qualitative institutional and functional analysis. The findings indicate that in the contemporary Russian context, the influence of the key interest rate on short-term equity market dynamics is diminishing, whereas the role of ruble liquidity is increasingly pronounced. It is established that the response of market capitalization to macroeconomic impulses exhibits sectoral heterogeneity and is contingent upon the dominant transmission channel–interest rate, credit, fiscal, or foreign trade. The study substantiates that ownership structure, state participation, and investor composition act as robust modifiers of the market response. The primary result of this paper is the development of a matrix of institutional filters linking macroeconomic policy decisions to the heterogeneous responses across various segments of the Russian stock market. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the conceptualization of elements for a transmission model mapping macroeconomic policy onto the capitalization of public companies.

Keywords: macroeconomic policy, monetary policy, stock market, transmission mechanism, market liquidity, institutional constraints, stock market capitalization.

JEL: E44, E52, E62

EDN: VUFPUR

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2026_2_28_44

References

  1. Abramova M.A., Dubova S.E., Zakharova O.V., Zeleneva E.S., Pishchik V.Ya. On the Main Directions of the Unified State Monetary Policy for 2025 and the Period of 2026 and 2027: Opinion of Experts of the Financial University // Economics. Taxes. Law. 2025. Vol. 18. No. 1. Pp. 6–17. (In Russ.).
  2. Aganin A.D. Volatility of the Russian Stock Index: Oil and Sanctions // Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2020. No. 2. Pp. 86–100. (In Russ.).
  3. Akhmetov A., Vasyutina A. Identifying the Disposition Effect in the Behavior of Russian Retail Investors: Analytical Note. Moscow: Bank of Russia, 2024. (In Russ.). https://www.cbr.ru/content/document/file/170760/analytic_note_20241227_dip.pdf (accessed: 16.12.2025).
  4. Belozorova E.N. Effectiveness of the Federal Reserve’s Monetary Policy for Inflation Targeting in 2022–2024 // Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025. Vol. 29. No. 5. Pp. 64–76. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-5-64-76.
  5. Evstigneeva A.G., Shchadilova Yu.G., Sidorovskii M.O. The Role of Communication and Information Factors in the Emergence of Bank of Russia Monetary Policy Surprises: Report on Economic Research No. 99 / Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Moscow: Bank of Russia, 2022. (In Russ.).
  6. Eremin V.V., Silvestrov S.N. Methodology for Assessing the Direct and Indirect Impact of Sanctions on the Resource Potential of National and Regional Economies // Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2025. No. 1. Pp. 162–174. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-208-162-174.
  7. Kramkov V.A., Maksimov A.G. Monetary Surprises and the Term Structure of Interest Rates: Identification via Heteroskedasticity // Applied Econometrics. 2024. No. 74. Pp. 5–34. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/1993-7601-2024-74-5-34.
  8. Krinichanskii K.V. Theoretical Foundations and Problem Areas of the Modern Theory of “Long Money” // Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025. Vol. 29. No. 5. Pp. 112–125. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-5-112-125.
  9. Perekhod S.A., Mkhitaryan A.V., Selifonkina D.S. International Sanctions Against Russia (2014–2024): Assessment and Consequences for the Financial Market // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2024. No. 4. Pp. 116–138. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2024_4_116_138. EDN: RWIZLA.
  10. Sakharov D.M. Development of the Russian Financial Market in the Context of the Structural Transformation of the Global Financial System // Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025. Vol. 29. No. 4. Pp. 49–70. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-4-49-70.
  11. Silaeva V.A. The Effectiveness of Sanctions in International Politics // MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2021. Vol. 14. No. 4. Pp. 136–153. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2021-4-79-136-153. EDN: WJBTXT.
  12. Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia). Review of Key Indicators of Brokers for Q3 2025. Moscow: Bank of Russia, 2025. (In Russ.). https://cbr.ru/Collection/Collection/File/59459/review_broker_Q3_2025.pdf (accessed: 26.12.2025).
  13. Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia). Financial Market Risks Review: Information and Analytical Report. 2024. No. 11 (92), November. Moscow: Bank of Russia, 2024. (In Russ.). https://www.cbr.ru/collection/collection/file/54899/orfr_2024-11.pdf (accessed: 05.12.2025).
  14. Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia). Review of the Russian Financial Sector and Financial Instruments. 2021: Analytical Report. Moscow: Bank of Russia, 2022. (In Russ.). https://www.cbr.ru/collection/collection/file/40903/overview_2021.pdf (accessed: 28.12.2025).
  15. Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia). On Including the Forecast Path of the Key Rate in the Bank of Russia Forecast: Methodological Commentary (22 April 2021). Moscow: Bank of Russia, 2021. (In Russ.). https://cbr.ru/Content/Document/File/120322/comment_20210422.pdf (accessed: 18.12.2025).
  16. Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia). Main Directions of the Unified State Monetary Policy for 2021 and the 2022–2023 Period. Moscow: Bank of Russia, 2020. (In Russ.). https://www.cbr.ru/content/document/file/87358/on_2021%282022-2023%29.pdf (accessed: 24.11.2025).
  17. Central Bank of the Russian Federation (Bank of Russia). Main Directions of the Unified State Monetary Policy for 2024 and the 2025–2026 Period. Moscow: Bank of Russia, 2023. (In Russ.). https://www.cbr.ru/content/document/file/150582/on_2024%282025-2026%29.pdf (accessed: 13.12.2025).
  18. Eskindarov O.M., Manyakhin T.V. Liquidity Maneuver in the Russian Financial System in the Context of Inflation and Stock Market Development // Finance: Theory and Practice. 2025. Vol. 29. No. 5. Pp. 47–63. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2025-29-5-47-63.
  19. Altavilla C., Brugnolini L., Gürkaynak R.S., Motto R., Ragusa G. Measuring Euro Area Monetary Policy // Journal of Monetary Economics. 2019. Vol. 108. Pp. 162–179.
  20. Ankudinov A.B., Bataeva B.S. Capital Structure and Market Capitalization: Empirical Analysis of Russian Public Companies // Upravlenets – The Manager. 2021. Vol. 12. No. 2. Pp. 35–45.
  21. Bannikova V. Estimation of Multidimensionality of Monetary Policy Using High-Frequency Data // Russian Journal of Money and Finance. 2024. Vol. 83. No. 4. Pp. 3–26.
  22. Bauer M.D., Swanson E.T. An Alternative Explanation for the “Fed Information Effect” // American Economic Review. 2023. Vol. 113. No. 3. Pp. 664–700.
  23. Bernanke B.S., Gertler M. Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1995. Vol. 9. No. 4. Pp. 27–48.
  24. Bernanke B.S., Gertler M., Gilchrist S. The Financial Accelerator in a Quantitative Business Cycle Framework // Handbook of Macroeconomics. Elsevier, 1999. Vol. 1.
  25. Bernanke B.S., Kuttner K.N. What Explains the Stock Market’s Reaction to Federal Reserve Policy? // Journal of Finance. 2005. Vol. 60. No. 3. Pp. 1221–1257.
  26. Bu C., Rogers J., Wu W. A Unified Measure of Fed Monetary Policy Shocks // Journal of Monetary Economics. 2021. Vol. 118. Pp. 331–349.
  27. Fedorova E., Nevredinov A., Chernikova L. The Impact of Sanctions on the Capitalization of Russian Companies: The Sectoral Aspect // Journal of Corporate Finance Research. 2023. Vol. 17. No. 2. Pp. 50–67.
  28. Gabaix X., Koijen R.S.J. In Search of the Origins of Financial Fluctuations: The Inelastic Markets Hypothesis // Journal of Financial Economics. 2021. Vol. 141. No. 2. Pp. 992–1020.
  29. Gürkaynak R.S., Sack B., Swanson E. Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words? The Response of Asset Prices to Monetary Policy Actions and Statements // International Journal of Central Banking. 2005. Vol. 1. No. 1. Pp. 55–93.
  30. Jarociński M., Karadi P. Deconstructing Monetary Policy Surprises: The Role of Information Shocks // American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. 2020. Vol. 12. No. 2. Pp. 1–43.
  31. Kuttner K.N. Monetary Policy Surprises and Interest Rates: Evidence from the Fed Funds Futures Market // Journal of Monetary Economics. 2001. Vol. 47. No. 3. Pp. 523–544.
  32. Modigliani F., Miller M.H. The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment // American Economic Review. 1958. Vol. 48. No. 3. Pp. 261–297.
  33. Nakamura E., Steinsson J. High-Frequency Identification of Monetary Non-Neutrality: The Information Effect // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2018. Vol. 133. No. 3. Pp. 1283–1330.
  34. Paul P. The Time-Varying Effect of Monetary Policy on Asset Prices // Review of Economics and Statistics. 2020. Vol. 102. No. 4. Pp. 690–704.
  35. Prokopev F. Balance Sheet Channel of Monetary Policy: Evidence from Credit Spreads of Russian Firms // Russian Journal of Money and Finance. 2021. Vol. 80. No. 4. Pp. 3–30.
  36. Rigobon R., Sack B. The Impact of Monetary Policy on Asset Prices // Journal of Monetary Economics. 2004. Vol. 51. No. 8. Pp. 1553–1575.
  37. Shiller R.J. Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to Be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends? // American Economic Review. 1981. Vol. 71. No. 3. Pp. 421–436.
  38. Tobin J. A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory // Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 1969. Vol. 1. No. 1. Pp. 15–29.

Manuscript submission date: 09.02.2026

Manuscript acceptance date: 02.04.2026

 

For citation:

Perekhod S.A., Velichko V.V., Kovalenko A.N. The Impact of Macroeconomic Policy on the Capitalization of the Russian Stock Market // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2026. № 2. Pp. 28-44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2026_2_28_44 EDN: VUFPUR

  Creative Commons 4.0

© Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2021 - 2026

32, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, Moscow, Russia 117218, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Phone.: +7 (499) 724-13-91, E-mail: vestnik-ieran@inecon.ru