The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 1/2023. Issues of Economic theory.

Maltsev Andrey A.

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Leading Researcher at the Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia

Chichilimov Sergey V.

graduate student, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia

TO THE QUESTION OF THE EVOLUTION OF THE OPPOSITION OF FREE TRADE AND PROTECTIONISM IN THE 20TH AND 21TH CENTURY

Размер файла 21-39 Размер файла  328.55 KB  Open .pdf

Abstract

The 20th century was marked by the emergence and formation of new economic centers of power in the world economy. This is where a combination of factors came into play. Firstly, with the acceleration of economic development and the massification of industry and consumption in the 1920s, the need to find new markets increased. Secondly, fundamental technical, economic and social shifts in society brought to life the first (1870–1913) and second (1950–2010) waves of globalization. Thirdly, the process of decolonization of the world economy, which ended by 1975, formed the demand for a self-sufficient and independent economic policy of the Third World countries. As a result, the Great Modern Stage (GMS, 1920s–2020s) took shape, its main distinguishing feature, according to the authors, being coexistence of free trade and protectionism, which had previously successively replaced each other in the world economic practice.

Keywords: globalization, international trade, world economy, protectionism, free trade, hidden protectionism, economic thought.

JEL: F02, F41, F55.

EDN: CXEVFE

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_1_21_39

 

References

  1. Alabuzhin I. Europe is in dire need of energy, but it cannot openly admit it // Expert. 2021. No. 44. Pp. 50–53. (In Russ.).
  2. Bell D. The Coming Post-Industrial Society. Experience of social forecasting. M: Academia, 2004. (In Russ.).
  3. The White House called the terrifying fact that the number of victims of covid in the United States approached 700 thousand // RBC. 2021, October 2. https://tass.ru/obschestvo/12560717. (In Russ.).
  4. Brunet A., Guichard J. The Geopolitics of Mercantilism: A New Perspective on the World Economy and International Relations. M.: New Chronograph, 2012. (In Russ.).
  5. Veselov V.A. Transformation of the parameters of strategic stability: the role of the technological factor // Bulletin of the Moscow University. 2015. No. 3. Pp. 23–56. (In Russ.).
  6. Gurova T., Mamedyarov Z. The West “ate” the resources of the Eastern bloc, but the energy crisis did not resolve // Expert 2022. No. 11. Pp. 70–75. (In Russ.).
  7. Derlugyan G. M. The Soviet Revolution of 1905–1945: theses for the first century // Emergency reserve. 2017. No. 5. Pp. 80–96. (In Russ.).
  8. Dynkin A.A. International turbulence and Russia // Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2020. Vol. 90. No. 3. Pp. 208–219. (In Russ.).
  9. Kolodko G.V. Deficitflation 3.0: Wartime Economy—State Socialism—Crisis Against the Background of the Pandemic // Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021. No. 10. Pp. 5–26. (In Russ.).
  10. Konstantinov A. Second quantum revolution // Expert. 2021. No. 47. Pp. 70–74. (In Russ.).
  11. Kudiyarov S. Closed the composite chain // Expert. 2021. No. 49. Pp. 22–24. (In Russ.).
  12. Leybin V. Artificial intelligence: what can and what can not // Expert. 2021. No. 49. Pp. 42–47. (In Russ.).
  13. Leybin V., Sysoev T. Without a consumer society, the scientific and technical backwardness of the USSR was inevitable // Expert. 2021. No. 48. Pp. 84–89. (In Russ.).
  14. Maltsev A.A. Sources and consequences of the “technological stagnation” of the global economy // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Ser. 5. 2014. Issue. 3. Pp. 67–85. (In Russ.).
  15. Mises L. Liberalism in the classical tradition. Moscow: Nachala-Press, 1994. (In Russ.).
  16. Minaev S. Crash, Britain. Kommersant, 2017. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3409691. (In Russ.).
  17. Pushkov A. “Afghan syndrome” // Rossiyskaya Gazeta. 2021. September 21. No. 216. (In Russ.).
  18. Rifkin J. The third industrial revolution: How horizontal interactions are changing energy, the economy and the world as a whole. M.: Alpina non-fiction, 2014. (In Russ.).
  19. Smirnov A. Biden: a year of vanished illusions // Expert. 2021. No. 45. Pp. 58–61. (In Russ.)
  20. Stepanov A.S. American experts on the confrontation between the USA and China // USA & Canada: economics, politics, culture. 2021. No. 9. Pp. 89–105. (In Russ.).
  21. Topchy I. The American fleet is weakening. China gets a historical chance // Expert. 2021. No. 47. Pp. 76–80. (In Russ.).
  22. Torkanovskiy E.P. Avtarkia 2.0: the global environmental agenda, the COVID-19 pandemic and the new normal // Economic relations. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 663–682. (In Russ.).
  23. Schwab K. The fourth industrial revolution. M.: Eksmo, 2016. (In Russ.).
  24. Acemoglu D. Understanding the New Nationalism. Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/new-nationalism-three-factors-reaction-toglobalization-by-daron-acemoglu-2022-06.
  25. Balassa В. The New Protectionism and the International Economy // Journal of World Trade Law. 1978. No. 5. Pp. 408–436.
  26. Balassa В. The Theory of Economic Integration. Homewood: R.D. Irwin, 1961.
  27. Collected Works of Michal Kalecki: Volume I edited by Osiatynnsky J. New-York: Oxford University press, 1990.
  28. Douglas P., Director A. The Problem of Unemployment. New York: Macmillan Company, 1931. P. 498.
  29. Fukuyama F. The End of History? // The National Interest. 1989. № 3. Рp. 3–18.
  30. Fukuyama F. The future of American power // The Economist. 2021. 18 August.
  31. Galbraith J. K. The End of Normal: The Great Crisis and the Future of Growth. New York: Free Press, 2014.
  32. Irwin D. A. Clashing over Commerce: A History of U.S. Trade Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.
  33. Keynes J. M. National Self-Sufficiency // The Yale Review. 1933. No. 4. Рp. 755–769.
  34. Keynes J. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1936.
  35. Krugman. P. Increasing returns, monopolistic competition // Journal of Economic Theory. 1979. No. 9. Pp. 369–479.
  36. Krugman P. In Praise of Cheap Labor. 1997. http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_dismal_science/1997/03/in_praise_of_cheap_labor.html.
  37. Linder S. Аn Essay on Trade and Transformation. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells boktrycker, 1961.
  38. List F. American Political Economy. Philadelphia: Printed by Samuel Parker, 1827.
  39. Maddison A. The World Economy. Development Centre Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2006.
  40. Melitz М., Ottaviano G. Market Size, Trade, and Productivity. Review of Economic Studies, 2008. Рp. 295–312.
  41. Perry M. Animated chart of the day: World’s top ten manufacturing nations, 1970 to 2017 // American Enterprise Institutе. 
  42. Pilisuk M., Rountry J. Who benefits from global violence and war: uncovering a destructive system. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group, 2008.
  43. Reinert E. How Rich Countries Got Rich and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. London: Constable & Robinson, 2008.
  44. Reinert E., Reinert S. Mercantilism and Economic Development: Schumpeterian Dynamics, Institution Building, and International Benchmarking. Oikos, 2011. Vol. 10. No. 1. Pp. 8–37.
  45. Samuelson P. International Trade and the Equalisation of Factor Prices // The Economic Journal. 1949. No. 7. Рp. 163–184.
  46. Stolper W., Samuelson P. Protection and Real Wages // The Review of Economic Studies. 1941. No. 9. Рp. 58–73.
  47. The Global Risks Report 2021. WEF. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2021.pdf.
  48. The project for the new American century. About PNAC. https://web.archive.org/web/20131006055540/http://www.newamericancentury.org/aboutpnac.htm.
  49. The World Bank Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator.
  50. Vernon R. Trade Policy in Crisis. Essays // International Finance. 1958. No. 28.
  51. Widdig B. Culture and inflation in Weimar Germany. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.
  52. Williamson J. Outline of speech at the Center for Strategic & International Studies Washington, DC. Did the Washington Consensus Fail? https://www.piie.com/commentary/speeches-papers/did-washington-consensus-fail.
  53. World Trade Report 2013. WTO. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/world_trade_report13_e.pdf.

Manuscript submission date: 07.11.2022

For citation:

Maltsev A.A., Chichilimov S.V. To the question of the evolution of the opposition of free trade and protectionism in the 20th and 21th century // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2023. № 1. Pp. 21-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_1_21_39 EDN: CXEVFE

  Creative Commons 4.0

© Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2021 - 2024

32, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, Moscow, Russia 117218, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Phone.: +7 (499) 724-13-91, E-mail: vestnik-ieran@inbox.ru