The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 6/2025. World Economy. 

 

Nataliya V. Smorodinskaya

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher, Institute of Economics of the RAS, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-4741-9197

 

Daniel D. Katukov

Researcher, Institute of Economics of the RAS, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-3839-5979

 

Vyacheslav E. Malygin

Senior Researcher, Institute of Economics of the RAS, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-0545-6456

 

TRUMPONOMICS AS THE APOTHEOSIS OF ECONOMIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL NATIONALISM

Размер файла127-146
Размер файла  377.89 K Размер файла Full text

The paper describes, using the example of the US “America First” policy, a global trend of the 2020s — the revival of economic nationalism (EN). We demonstrate how security imperatives are becoming central to economic strategies, with the weaponization of countries’ economic interdependencies emerging as a distinctive policy instrument. We examine the contemporary model of EN, identifying its key features and instruments, with particular emphasis on technological nationalism as its core component. This analytical framework helps us to reveal the contradictory nature of Trumponomics (the President Trump’s course since 2025), the trap of irreconcilable technological rivalry between the US and China, and the risks of Trump’s ‘bilateral deals” for the global economy. We find that nations’ transition under the EN doctrine from liberal principles of economic openness and free trade to protectionist and self-sufficiency ideologies entails the accumulation of economic inefficiencies. This trend can ultimately undermine countries’ ability to achieve those very goals of sustainable and secure development for which they have made this policy shift.

Keywords: economic nationalism, technological sovereignty, weaponization of interdependencies, securitization, trade war, Trumponomics, US-China rivalry.

JEL: F52, F50, F13

EDN: WGDALA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_6_127_146

References

  1. Smorodinskaya N.V., Katukov D.D. Moving towards technological sovereignty: A new global trend and the Russian specifics // Baltic Region. 2024. Vol. 16. No. 3. Pp. 108–135. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2024-3-6.
  2. de Bolle M., Cohen-Setton J., Sarsenbayev M. The new economic nationalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2025.
  3. Capri A. Techno-nationalism: How it’s reshaping trade, geopolitics and society. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2024.
  4. Farrell H., Newman A. Underground empire: How America weaponized the world economy. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Co., 2023.
  5. Cha V.D. Collective resilience: Deterring China’s weaponization of economic interdependence // International Security. 2023. Vol. 48. No. 1. Pp. 91–124. DOI: 10.1162/isec_a_00465.
  6. Smorodinskaya N.V., Malygin V.E. Economic security and technological sovereignty in modern industrial policy // Microeconomics. 2024. No. 6. Pp. 94–103. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33917/mic-6.119.2024.94-103.
  7. Suesse M. The nationalist dilemma: A global history of economic nationalism, 1776–present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.
  8. G20 trade policy factbook. 2025 edition. Global Trade Alert, 2025. https://globaltradealert.org/reports/G20-Trade-Policy-Factbook-2025.
  9. Katukov D.D., Smorodinskaya N.V. Russia’s technological sovereignty and leadership: Strategic intentions and domestic constraints // Society and Economy. 2025. No. 12. Pp. 38–59. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S0207367625120032.
  10. Blackwill R.D., Harris J.M. War by other means: Geoeconomics and statecraft. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.
  11. Luo Y. Illusions of techno-nationalism // Journal of International Business Studies. 2022. Vol. 53. No. 3. Pp. 550–567. DOI: 10.1057/s41267-021-00468-5.
  12. Aiyar S., Ilyina A., Chen J., Kangur A., Trevino J., Ebeke C., Gudmundsson T., Soderberg G., Schulze T., Kunaratskul T., Ruta M., Garcia-Saltos R., Rodriguez S. Geo-economic fragmentation and the future of multilateralism // IMF Staff Discussion Notes No. SDN/2023/001. 2023. DOI: 10.5089/9798400229046.006.
  13. Reynolds E.B. S. industrial transformation and the “how” of 21st century industrial strategy // Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade. 2024. Vol. 24. No. 1. Article 8. DOI: 10.1007/s10842-024-00420-x.
  14. BaldwinE. The great trade hack: How Trump’s trade war fails and the world moves on. Paris: CEPR Press, 2025.
  15. Grossman G.M., Sykes A.O. Commandeering the customs: An economic and legal perspective on the president’s “emergency” imposition of “reciprocal tariffs”. 2025.
  16. Mariotti S. Firms as political forces for good: Navigating disorder and state interventionism in a multipolar world // Thunderbird International Business Review. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/tie.70014.
  17. Knobel A., Ponomareva O. US trade policy: Current situation and prospects // Monitoring of Russia’s Economic Outlook. 2025. No. 15. (In Russ.). https://ideas.repec.org/a/gai/monreo/monreo-2025-15-1434.html
  18. Khong Y.F., Liow J.C. Southeast Asia is starting to choose: Why the region is leaning toward China // Foreign Affairs. 2025. Vol. 104. No. 4. Pp. 151–161.
  19. Roberts A., Choer Moraes H., Ferguson V. Toward a geoeconomic order in international trade and investment // Journal of International Economic Law. 2019. Vol. 22. No. 4. Pp. 655–676. DOI: 10.1093/jiel/jgz036.
  20. Zenglein M.J., Gunter J. The party knows best: Aligning economic actors with China’s strategic goals. Berlin: MERICS, 2023. https://merics.org/en/report/party-knows-bestaligning-economic-actors-chinas-strategic-goals.
  21. Chan K., Czin J.A., Hass R., Heerman K., Kim P.M., O’Hanlon M.E., Rapp-Hooper M., Sisson M.W., Thornton S.A. What happened when Trump met Xi? // Brookings. 2025. https://brookings.edu/articles/what-happened-when-trump-met-xi (accessed: 06.11.2025).
  22. Goodman M.P. The US must set limits on economic security // The Banker. 2025. https://thebanker.com/content/d691d5d2-1053-4018-a36d-4ab50491165a (accessed: 14.11.2025).
  23. Froman M.B.G. After the trade war: Remaking rules from the ruins of the rules-based system // Foreign Affairs. 2025. Vol. 104. No. 5. Pp. 60–74.
  24. Tobin L. America first vs. China’s brute force economics // Lessons from the new Cold War: America confronts the China challenge / Brands H. (ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2025. Pp. 17–34.
  25. Siripurapu N., Berman A. What are tariffs? // Council on Foreign Relations. 2025. https://cfr.org/backgrounder/what-are-tariffs (accessed: 02.04.2025).
  26. Froman M. Trade-offs in Trump’s trade policy // CFR. 2025. https://cfr.org/article/tradeoffs-trumps-trade-policy (accessed: 02.08.2025).
  27. Steil B. Who pays Trump’s tariffs? // Council on Foreign Relations. 2025. https://cfr.org/article/who-pays-trumps-tariffs (accessed: 05.11.2025).
  28. Global Trade Update (October 2025): Global trade remains strong despite policy changes and uncertainty. 2025. https://unctad.org/publication/global-tradeupdate-october-2025-global-trade-remains-strong-despite-policy-changes-and
  29. Antràs P., Chor D. Global value chains // Handbook of international economics / Gopinath G., Helpman E., Rogoff K.S. (ed.). Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 5. Pp. 297–376.
  30. Fernández-Villaverde J., Mineyama T., Song D. Are we fragmented yet? Measuring geopolitical fragmentation and its causal effect // NBER Working Papers No. 32638. 2024. DOI: 10.3386/w32638.

Manuscript submission date: 16.10.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 18.11.2025

 

For citation:

Smorodinskaya N.V., Katukov D.D., Malygin V.E. Trumponomics as the apotheosis of economic and technological nationalism// Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 6. Pp. 127-146. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_6_127_146 EDN: WGDALA

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 6/2025. World Economy. 

 

Daria I. Ushkalova

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Head of the Center for International Macroeconomics Research and Foreign Relations, Institute of Economics of the RAS, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-1517-4698

 

D. TRUMP’S TARIFF POLICY AND RUSSIA’S FOREIGN TRADE

Размер файла109-126
Размер файла  402.53 K Размер файла Full text

The article analyzes in detail the specifics of the tariff policy of the Trump administration, including its origins, legal grounds and theoretical grounds, non-compliance with the norms of the World Trade Organization, effectiveness in modern conditions and consequences for the global economy and international trade. The conclusion is drawn about the limited effectiveness of this policy in relation to US trade with China. The impact of D. Trump’s tariff policy on Russia’s foreign trade is considered separately.

Keywords: D. Trump’s tariff policy, US foreign trade policy, reciprocal tariffs, US-China trade war, Russian foreign trade.

JEL: F13, F51, F52, F53

EDN: OUOHBB

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_6_109_126

References

  1. R. 764, United States Reciprocal Trade Act. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116thcongress/house-bill/764?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22duffy%22%5D%7D (дата обращения: 30.11.2025).
  2. The United States Reciprocal Trade Act: Estimated Job & Trade Deficit Effects. White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy. May 2019. https://www.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/RTAReport.pdf?mod=article_inline).
  3. Ushkalova D. The tariff policy of the Trump administration in the context of the functioning of the multilateral trading system // Society and Economy. 2025. No. 12. (In Russ.).
  4. Auzan A., Zvereva N., Ivanov V., Kurdin A., Kudryashova E., Nikishina E., Sitkevich D. Institutional economics. Electronic textbook. Moscow, Faculty of Economics, Moscow State University, 2022]. https://books.econ.msu.ru/Institutionaleconomics/?ysclid=mg3mgdadp730611239 (accessed: 30.11.2025).
  5. World Economic Outlook: Global economy in flux, prospects remain dim. Washington, IMF, October 2025.
  6. World Economic Outlook: A Critical Juncture amid Policy Shifts. Washington, IMF, April 2025.
  7. Commodity Markets Outlook, October 2025. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2025.

Manuscript submission date: 25.10.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 18.11.2025

 

For citation:

Ushkalova D.I. D. Trump’s tariff policy and Russia’s foreign trade // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 6. Pp. 109-126. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_6_109_126 EDN: OUOHBB

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 4/2025. World Economy. 

Nadezhda D. Frolova

Ph.D in Economic Sciences, Senior Researcher of the Center for Public Administration Research, Institute of Economics of the RAS, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-3696-2688

 

ON THE ROLE OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES IN THE ECONOMY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS

Размер файла166-182 Размер файла  610.92 K Размер файла Full text

The article examines modern research approaches to assessing the role of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the economy of the Republic of Belarus. There are the results of the analysis of the main statistical indicators characterizing the activities of Belarusian SOEs. The study highlights key trends of their development and emphasizes dominant role of Belarusian SOEs in the national economy. The risks caused by the low efficiency of the management system are also emphasized.

Keywords: state-owned enterprises, state capitalism, government’s role in the economy, effectiveness of state-owned enterprises, management of state-owned enterprises.

JEL: H82, H32, P26

EDN: IEVMFW

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_4_167_182

References

  1. Astakhova S. Belarus: Cooperation with Russia in the Conditions of the Sanctions // Russia and New States of Eurasia. 2023. No. 2 (59). Pp. 103–111. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/2073-4786-2023-2-103-111. EDN: RGJEMQ.
  2. Grosman A., Kozarzewski P., Okhmatovskiy I. Varieties of capitalism in central and eastern Europe. In book: Oxford Handbook of Central and East European Management and OrganizationsPublisher: Oxford University Press, 2023.
  3. Rudy K. State Capitalism in Belarus // World Eсonomy and International Relations. 2016. Vol. 60. No. 4. 77–85. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-4-77-85. EDN: VZRXNP.
  4. Rudy K. State Capitalism in Belarus: Behind Economic Anemia [Internet. Public Sector Crisis Management. IntechOpen, 2020. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.93606.
  5. Rudy K. Behavioral Economy: Main Features in Belarus // World Eсonomy and International Relations. 2018. Vol. 62. No. 6. Pp. 36-44. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-6-36-44. EDN: XQMYTR.
  6. Rudy K. State Capitalism Reforms and the Path for Belarus: Financial Diet. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2020.
  7. Kozarzewski P., Papko A. The Belarusian Development Path: From Command Economy to State Capitalism? In: Ricz J., Gerőcs T. (eds.). The Political Economy of Emerging Markets and Alternative Development Paths. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-20702-0_7.
  8. Hajduk K. The sector of state-owned enterprises: structural challenges // Bankauski vesnik. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 26–30. (In Russ.).
  9. Daneyko P., Chubrik A., Gaiduk K., Bornukova K., Kruk D. Transformation of the sector of stateowned commercial enterprises in Belarus // IPM Research Center, BEROC Center for Economic Research, 2020. https://research.by/webroot/delivery/files/pdp2020r07.pdf (accessed: 11.02.2025). (In Russ.).
  10. Frolova N.D. The governance of companies with state participation (international experience): Scientific report. М.: Institute of Economics of the RAS, 2024. (In Russ.).
  11. Kim K. The Role of State Ownership: Overview of State-Owned Entities in the Global Economy. Roosevelt Institute, 12.02.2024. https://rooseveltinstitute.org/publications/the-role-of-state-ownership
  12. Alami I., Dixon A. D., Gonzalez-Vicente R., Babic M., Seung-Ook L., Medby I. A., Graaff N. Geopolitics and the ‘New’ State Capitalism // Geopolitics. 2021. Vol. 27. Iss. 3. 995–1023. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2021.1924943.
  13. Vagliasindi M., Cordella T., Clifton J. Introduction: Revisiting the Role of State-Owned Enterprises in Strategic Sectors // Journal of Economic Policy Reform. 2022. Vol. 26. 1. Pp. 1–23. DOI: 10.1080/17487870.2022.2080409.
  14. Bernier L, Florio M., Bance Ph. The Routledge Handbook of State-Owned Enterprises. New York. Routledge. 2020. DOI: 10.4324/9781351042543.
  15. Smotritskaya I.I., Frolova N.D. To the issue of development of entrepreneurial state activity // Society and Economy. 2024. No. 4. Pp. 5–16. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S0207367624040012.
  16. Qi H., Kotz D.M. The Impact of State-Owned Enterprises on China’s Economic Growth // Review of Radical Political Economics. 2020. Vol. 52. Iss. 1. Pp. 96–114. DOI: 10.1177/0486613419857249.
  17. Belloc F. Innovation in State-Owned Enterprises: Reconsidering the Conventional Wisdom // Journal of Economic Issues. 2014. No. 48 (3). Pp. 821–848. DOI: 10.2753/JEI0021-3624480311.
  18. Castelnovo P. Innovation in private and state-owned enterprises: A cross-industry analysis of patenting activity // Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2022. Vol. 62. Pp. 98–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2022.05.007.
  19. Polterovich V.M. Privatization and the rational ownership structure. Part 1: privatization: the efficiency problem // The economic science of modern Russia. 2012. No. 4 (59). Pp. 7–23 (In Russ.).

Manuscript submission date: 18.02.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 07.08.2025

 

For citation:

Frolova N.D. On the role of state-owned enterprises in the economy of the Republic of Belarus // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 4. Pp. 167-182. (In Russ.).  https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_4_167_182  EDN: IEVMFW

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 6/2025. World Economy. 

 

Vladimir V. Eremin

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher, Institute of Economic Policy and Economic Security Problems, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-2144-3543

 

Sergey A. Pobyvaev

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher, Institute of Economic Policy and Economic Security Problems, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-7312-7059

 

Sergey N. Silvestrov

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Honoured Economist of the Russian Federation, Head of the Institute of Economic Policy and Economic Security Problems, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-7678-1283

 

ECONOMIC FACTORS OF GLOBAL TURBULENCE

Размер файла86-108
Размер файла  436.95 K Размер файла Full text

In recent decades, trends of global economic turbulence have intensified worldwide, ex- pressed both in increased uncertainty, nonlinearity of economic processes, and the rise of economic and geopolitical conflicts. The authors of the study see one of the main factors intensifying global economic turbulence as the long-standing contradiction between the potential growth in global production, the need for this growth to stimulate positive dynamics in the global economy, and the limited availability of global sales markets. In the study, the authors analyze a wide range of phenomena, problems and contradictions associated with the limited availability of global markets, which are factors in global turbulence. By examining the problem of limited markets and the contradictions generated by this problem, such as the confrontation between national and supranational development institutions, the clash between national interests and the interests of transnational corporations and others, the authors form their own vision of possible scenarios for changes in the world order and the global economy.

Keywords: economic contradictions, geoeconomics, macroeconomic instability, capital consolidation, global turbulence, global economy, geopolitics, post-industrial development, sales markets.

JEL: F01, F02

EDN: UYSRNT

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_6_86_108

References

  1. Rosenau J.N. Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
  2. Rozov N.S. Epochs of turbulence and ways to overcome them // Politeia. 2019. No. 1 (92). Pp. 81–96. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2019-92-1-81-96.
  3. Populyakh D.S. Turbulence in Contemporary World Politics: Discourses and Practice. Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Polit.) Dissertation. Moscow: Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2016. (In Russ.).
  4. Come On! Capitalism, Short-Termism, Population, and the Destruction of the Planet / A Report of the Club of Rome/ by Ernst von Weizsecker& Anders Wijkman, co-authors in cooperation with 34 more Members of the Club of Rome prepared for the Club`s 50th Anniversary. Springer Science-Business Media LLC, 2018.
  5. Varga E.S. Modern capitalism and economic crises. Selected works. M.: Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1962. (In Russ.).
  6. Komolov О.О. Crises of capitalism in the soviet political economy paradigm and modernity // Bulletin of the Moscow Financial Law University. 2017. No 4. Pp. 25–36. (In Russ.). EDN: YMECSE.
  7. Fukuyama The End of History and the Last Man. Moscow: AST, 2011. (In Russ.).
  8. Vitali S., Glattfelder J.B., Battiston S. The Network of Global Corporate Control // PLoSONE. 2011. № 6 (10). e25995. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025995.
  9. Yu. Interaction of Transnational Corporations and the State: Political Analysis // Bulletin of the Volga region Institute of Administration. 2017. No. 6. Pp. 37–45. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/1682-2358-2017-6-37-45.
  10. Chandler Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1994.
  11. Simonyan R.H. Lithuanian Economy from the Soviet to the New Period // Modern Europe. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 72‒ (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15211/soveurope320207282.
  12. Rumyantsev M.A. Economy of Postmodern Society: Critical Analysis // Christian Reading. 2012. No. 6. Pp. 165–181. (In Russ.).
  13. Karaganov A. Century of Wars? Article One // Russia in Global Politics. 2024. Vol. 22. No. 1. Pp. 52–64. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31278/1810-6439-2024-22-1-52-64.
  14. Beck W. What is globalization? M.: Progress-Tradition, 2001. (In Russ.).
  15. Veselov Yu.V. Economic sociology of postmodernism // Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 1998. Vol. 1. No. 1. Pp. 72–80. (In Russ).
  16. Kamenskaya G.V. Liberalism: classic and postmodern // Political science issueses, 2022. Vol. 12, No. 11 (87). Pp. 3612–3620. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35775/PSI.2022.87.11.001.
  17. Perskaya V.V. Fiscal Policy as a Tool for Implementing US Strategic Priorities // Economics, taxes & law. 2023. No. 16 (1). Pp. 22–35. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2023-16-1-22-35.

Manuscript submission date: 28.05.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 18.11.2025

 

For citation:

Eremin V.V., Pobyvaev S.A., Silvestrov S.N. Economic factors of global turbulence // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 6. Pp. 86-108. (In Russ.).  https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_6_86_108 EDN: UYSRNT

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 4/2025. World Economy. 

Anna V. Belitskaya

Dr. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Entrepreneurial Law of the Faculty of Law, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-6988-4022

 

Artem A. Yakovlev

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Deputy Director of the Moscow School of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Leading Researcher, Institute of Economics of the RAS, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0009-0004-5579-4458

 

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION: A NEW LEVEL OF A SOCIAL CONTRACT?

Размер файла150-166 Размер файла  315.06 KB Размер файла Full text

The purpose of this study is to identify the role of the social contract as a factor influencing the redistribution of resources within the framework of international economic integration, the effectiveness of creating a common market, solving the problems of ensuring the sustainability of economic growth, inequality and unemployment. In the course of the work, it was scientifically substantiated that the effectiveness of international economic integration depends on the presence of a social contract at the supranational level, supported by the possibility of distributing part of the rent not only by the state, but also directly by the integration association, as well as the possibility of creating supranational inclusive institutions within the framework of a common market of goods, capital and labor.

Keywords: international economic integration, regional economic integration, social contract, inclusive institutions, national economy, common market of goods, capital, labor, supranational level.

JEL: F15

EDN: YWUDKR

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_4_150_166

References

  1. Kheifets B.A. New model of international economic integration. M.: Institute of Economics of the RAS, 2023. (In Russ.)
  2. Shishkov Yu.V. Integration and disintegration: concept adjustment. World Economy and International Relations. 1993. No. 10. Pp. 50–68. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-1993-10-50-68.
  3. Politics / Ed. by A.I. Dovatur. Moscow: Publishing House “Yurait”, 2025. (In Russ.).
  4. List F. National system of political economy. Moscow; Chelyabinsk: Socium, 2017. (In Russ.).
  5. Engaged Societies, Responsive States: The Social Contract in Situations of Conflict and Fragility. Concept Note. April 2016. P.9. New York, 2016, https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/Social_Contract_
    in_Situations_of_Conflict_and_Fragility.pdf (accessed: 23.04.2025).
  6. Buchanan J., Tullock G. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor, 1962.
  7. Myrdal G. World Economy: Problems and Prospects. Moscow, 1958. (In Russ.).
  8. Ushkalova D.I., Golovnin M.Yu. Theoretical Approaches to the Study of International Economic Integration. M.: Institute of Economics of the RAS, 2011. (In Russ.).
  9. Haas E.B. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1958.
  10. Milward A. The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London, 2000.
  11. Deutsch K. Political Community at the International Level: Problems of Definition and Measurement. Princeton, New Jersey, 1953.
  12. Habermas J. Involving the Other: Essays on Political Theory. Moscow: Nauka, 2008. (In Russ.).
  13. Political Economy of Russia: Dynamics of the Social Contract in the 2000s. Selected Works of the Institute of the National Project “Social Contract”, 2000–2009 / Compiled by A.A. Auzan, A.V. Zolotov, A.A. Stavinskaya, V.L. Tambovtsev. М., 2010. (In Russ.).
  14. Mitrany D. A Working Peace System. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1966.
  15. Genna G.M., Yang Z., Abdollahian M. Regional Integration and Economic Development: Optimal or Messy Networks? The Journal of Economic Integration. 2024. No. 39 (3). Pp. 557–589. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2024029 (accessed: 12.07.2025).
  16. Haas E.B., Schmitter P. Economics and Differential Patterns of Political Integration: Projections about Unity in Latin America // International Organization. Vol. 18. No. 4. P. 710.
  17. Turaeva M., Yakovlev A. History of the Global Climate Agenda and Its Future in the Eurasian Economic Union // ISTORIYA. 2024. Vol. 15. Iss. 6 (140). https://history.jes.su/s207987840031942-5-1/. (accessed: 12.07.2025). (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840031942-5.
  18. Вutorina V.O. The Goals of Regional Integration: A Modern Understanding // World Economy and International Relations. 2021. Vol. 65. No. 10. Pp. 5–14. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-10-5-14.
  19. Streeten P. Economic Integration, Aspects and Problems. Leyden: A.W. Sythoff, 1964.
  20. Butorina O.V., Borko Yu.A. Benefits of Regional Integration: Reconsidering the Concept // Modern Europe. 2022. No. 1 (108). Pp. 5–20. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S0201708322010016.
  21. Ushkalova D.I. Models of Economic Integration and Their Typology // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2016. No. 3. Pp. 158–170. (In Russ.).
  22. Tinbergen J. International Economic Integration. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1954.
  23. Nekipelov A.D. Search for social optimum: chasing a ghost? // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023. No. 93 (5). Pp. 415–427. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S0869587323050080.
  24. Polterovich V.M. Collaborative hierarchies // Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021. No. 7. Pp. 31–48. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-7-31-48.
  25. Rodrik D. How Far Will International Economic Integration Go? // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 14. No. 1. 2000. Pp. 177–186.

Manuscript submission date: 20.04.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 07.08.2025

 

For citation:

Belitskaya A.V., Yakovlev A.A. International economic integration: a new level of a social contract? // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 4. Pp. 150-166. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_4_150_166 EDN: YWUDKR

  Creative Commons 4.0

© Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2021 - 2025

32, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, Moscow, Russia 117218, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Phone.: +7 (499) 724-13-91, E-mail: vestnik-ieran@inecon.ru