2. Home
  3. Latest issue
  4. Articles
  5. WORLD ECONOMY

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 1/2024.  World Economy.

Alexey A. Sidorov

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of International Economic Relations and Foreign Economic Affairs of N.N. Liventsev, MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-7632-3653

 

FOREIGN MARKET ACCESS IN THE SYSTEM OF MARKET RESEARCH

Размер файла138-153 Размер файла  311.05 KB Размер файла Full text

Abstract

The article presents a theoretical understanding of the concept of access to foreign markets in the context of market studies. It is determined that market access is a condition of the economic situation (conjuncture) formation, which has an impact on the elements of the reproduction process. The analysis of this category is necessary within the framework of market studies to complete the task of assessing the current and potential market capacity. The dependence of market access on the state of economic situation in the short and long term is analyzed, including in the context of the descending wave of the long economic cycle since the beginning of the second decade of the 21st century. The inverse relationship is also traced – the state of the conjuncture dependence on market access. Different approaches to market access research are shown depending on various types of forecasts. The issues of access to foreign markets and competitiveness in the system of market studies are differentiated. The problem of determining the primary source of success of export activities – the availability of competitive products or favorable market access conditions – is revealed; the author's view is presented.

Keywords: markets access, market situation, market studies, trade policy, protectionism, long economic cycles, forecasting, competitiveness.

JEL: F13, F43, F44, F51, F52

EDN: VMDGYJ

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_1_138_153

 

References

  1. Goryachev A.A.Problems of forecasting world commodity markets. M.: International Relations Publisher, 1981. (In Russ.).
  2. Dmitriev S.S.Protectionist Vector of Trump Administration Trade Policy // World Eсonomy and International Relations. 2020. № 2. Pp. 15–23. (In Russ.).
  3. Klinov V.G. Economic conjuncture. Factors and mechanisms of formation. M.: Ekonomika, 2005. (In Russ.).
  4. Klinov V.G., Sidorov A.A.Modifications of long economic cycles and prospects for global economic dynamics in 2021–2050 // Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2021. № 3. С. 159–167. (In Russ.).
  5. Klinov V.G., Sidorov A.A. Economic conjuncture. M.: Ekonomika, 2019. (In Russ.).
  6. Kolodko G.V.Whither the World: The Political Economy of the Future. M.: Magistr, 2014. (In Russ.).
  7. Kostyukhin D.I. Conjuncture of the world capitalist economy. M.: International Relations Publisher, 1973. (In Russ.).
  8. Levshin F.M. The world market: conjuncture, prices and marketing. M.: International Relations Publisher, 1993. (In Russ.).
  9. Manukovsky A.B., Khartukov E.M. Economic conjuncture. How to study the modern market.M.: MGIMO School of International Business, 1991. (In Russ.).
  10. Nikitin S.P. Conjuncture of world commodity markets: continuity and specificity. M.: International Relations Publisher, 1982. (In Russ.).
  11. A new paradigm for the development of international economic relations: challenges and prospects for Russia; ed. by T.M. Isachenko, L.S. Revenko. M.: MGIMO-University, 2022. (In Russ.).
  12. Ozerov I.H. What does America teach us?Saint Petersburg: Book Publishing House“Pol’za” V. Antik i Ko, 1908. (In Russ.).
  13. Piskoppel F.G. Fundamentals of studying the conjuncture of capitalist economy. M.: International Relations Publisher, 1960. (In Russ.).
  14. Polyakov V.V. World market: forecasting issues. M.: KNORUS, 2016. (In Russ.).
  15. Porter M. International competition: the competitive advantage of nations. M.: AlpinaPublisher, 2016. (In Russ.).
  16. Revenko L.S., Kryukov A.E. Conjunctural studies of world commodity markets. M.: MGIMO-University, 2010. (In Russ.).
  17. Rudomino A.V. Methodology of studying and forecasting the conjuncture of world commodity markets. M.: MGIMO, 1981. (In Russ.).
  18. Sidorov A.A. Foreign market access: theoretical approach and factors // The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023. № 2. С. 86–107. (In Russ.).
  19. Sidorov A.A. Eurozone general business situation: formation and dynamics. Moscow: INION RAN, 2019. (In Russ.).
  20. Ushkalova D.I.Russia’s foreign trade under sanctions pressure // The Journal of the New Economic Association. 2022. № 3. С. 218–226. (In Russ.).
  21. Tsygichko L.I. Theory and practice of economic conjuncture. M.: MGIMO, 1995. (In Russ.).
  22. Fugazza M., Nicita A. On the importance of market access for trade. New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2011.
  23. Global Trade Alert. Global Dynamics. https://www.globaltradealert.org/global_dynamics/area_goods/.
  24. IMD World Competitiveness Booklet 2022. Lausanne: International Institute for Management Development, 2022.
  25. The Global Competitiveness Report 2019; ed. by K. Schwab. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2019.
  26. World Trade Statistical Review 2023. Geneva: World Trade Organization, 2023.

Manuscript submission date: 07.11.2023

For citation:

Sidorov A.A. Foreign market access in the system of market research // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 1. Pp. 138-153. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_1_138_153 EDN: VMDGYJ

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 1/2024.  World Economy.

Andrey A. Maltsev

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Leading Researcher, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-3774-6311

 

GLOBAL META-RISKS IN THE POST-COVID ERA

Размер файла124-137 Размер файла  306.83 KB Размер файла Full text

Abstract

In the context of the discussion on deglobalization in economic literature, that has been intensified by the slowdown in globalization processes since the early 2010s, there was made an attempt to systemize the key challenges of the world economy at the current stage. Three enlarged clusters of global meta-risks were identified: the rise of protectionism, geopolitical uncertainty, digitalization challenges. Their consideration was based on the scheme of structuring the consequences that arise for and from the activities of the GVCs. The main conclusion was that our present reality remains as codependent world.

Keywords: geopolitical uncertainty, global meta-risks, global value chains, digitalization of the world economy, technological protectionism.

JEL: F02, F15, F23

EDN: UXTQTU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_1_124_137

References

  1. Labykin A. The “parallel” Turkish flow has not yet dried up // Expert. 2023. No. 12. Рp. 20–22. (In Russ.).
  2. Stolyarov A. The green era is leaving // Expert. 2023. No. 15. Рp. 13–17. (In Russ.).
  3. Dmitriev S.S. Rebooting the course towards restoring the industrial potential of the United States // World Economy and International Relations. 2022. T. 66. No. 8. Pp. 61–69. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-08-61-69.
  4. Makarov I.A. Taxonomy of trade barriers: five types of protectionism // Modern World Economy. 2023. T. 1. No. 1. Pp. 74–94. (In Russ.).
  5. Global Value Chain Development Report 2021. Beyond Production. Geneva: World Trade Organization, 2021.
  6. White House. Building Resilient Supply Chains, Revitalizing American Manufacturing, and Fostering Broad-Based Growth.100-day reviews under Executive Order 14017. A report by the White House: Washington, 2021.
  7. The Global Risks Report 2023 18th edition. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2023.
  8. Samuelson P. Where Ricardo and Mill Rebut and Confirm Arguments of Mainstream Economists Supporting Globalization // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2014. Vol. 18. No. 3. Pр. 135–146. DOI: 10.1257/0895330042162403.
  9. Bhagwati J., Panagariya A., Srinivasan T.N. The Muddles Over Outsourcing // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2004. Vol. 18. No. 4. Pр. 93–114. DOI: 10.1257/0895330042632753.
  10. Dixit A.K., Grossman G.M. The Limits of Free Trade // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2005. Vol. 19. No. 3. Pр. 241–244. DOI: 10.1257/089533005774357789.
  11. Kowalski P., Lopez-Gonzalez J., Ragoussis A., Ugarte C. Participation of Developing Countries in Global Value Chains: Implications for Trade and Trade-Related Policies. Paris: OECD trade policy papers. 2015. No. 179. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.1787/5js33lfw0xxn-en
  12. Antràs P. Conceptual Aspects of Global Value Chains. Washington: World Bank Group, World Development Report 2020 Team Policy Research Working Paper 9114, 2020.
  13. Lund S. et al. Risk, Resilience, and Rebalancing in Global Value Chains. The McKinsey Global Institute, 2020.
  14. Uzyakov M. Imperative forecast: year 2023 // Expert. 2023. No. 9. Pp. 20–21. (In Russ.).
  15. Ogorodnikov E. Don’t tell Macron, he’s not their loved one // Expert. 2022. No. 47. P. 9. (In Russ.).
  16. Acemogly D., Restrepo P.Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets. Washington: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 23285. 2017.
  17. Autor D.H., Hanson G. The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States // American Economic Review. 2013. Vol. 103. No. 6. Pp. 2121–2168. DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.6.2121.
  18. Meng B., Ye M., Wei S-J. Measuring Smile Curves in Global Value Chains // Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 2020. Vol. 82. Iss. 5. Pp. 988-1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12364.
  19. Smirnov A., Sysoev T., Skorobogaty P. Rethinking leadership and returning ideology: what Xi Jinping promises // Expert. 2022. No. 43. Pp. 13–19. (In Russ.).
  20. Ivanter A. A thousand li to power // Expert. 2022. No. 43. Pp. 20–22. (In Russ.).
  21. Magdalinskaya Yu. The Chinese Communist Party is moving into the future // Breath of China. 2022. November 10. No. 254. P. 7. (In Russ.).
  22. Ahir H., Bloom N., Furcery D. The World Uncertainty Index. Washington: International Monetary Fund, 2018.
  23. Ahir H., Bloom N., Furcery D. New Index Tracks Trade Uncertainty Across the Globe. IMF Blog. September 9, 2019. https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2019/09/09/blognew-index-tracks-trade-uncertainty-across-the-globe (дата обращения: 12.11.2023).
  24. Ogorodnikov E. Crisis? No, I don’t see // Expert. 2023. No. 7. P. 9. (In Russ.).
  25. World Development Report 2016. Digital Dividends. Washington: World Bank, 2016.
  26. The Global Risks Report 2021 16th edition. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2021.
  27. World Development Report 2021. Data for Better Lives. Washington: World Bank, 2021.
  28. The Global Risks Report 2022 17th edition. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2022.
  29. Obukhova E. From social network to superapp and back // Expert. 2023. No. 23. Pp. 18–24. (In Russ.).
  30. Butrin D. Test first on robots // Kommersant. 2023. April 12. No. 63. P. 2. (In Russ.).
  31. Kucherena A. Electronic apocalypse // Russian newspaper. 2023. April 12. No. 78. P. 7. (In Russ.).
  32. Zorkin V. Reformer – elite – people // Russian newspaper. 2023. May 15. No. 103. P. 13. (In Russ.).
  33. Skorobogaty P. Hybrid war is absolutely total. There are no more non-combatants // Expert. 2023. No. 21. P. 56–61. (In Russ.).
  34. Seong J. et al. Global Flows: The Ties That Bind in an Interconnected World. The McKinsey Global Institute Discussion Paper, 2022 // https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/global-flows-the-ties-thatbind-in-an-interconnected-world#/(дата обращения: 15.09.2023).

Manuscript submission date: 09.01.2024 

For citation:

Maltsev A.A. Global meta-risks in the post-COVID era // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 1. Pp. 124-137. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_1_124_137 EDN: UXTQTU

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 6/2023.  World Economy.

Natalia V. Kulikova

Cand. Sci. (Geography), Head of the Center for East European Studies, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 000-0001-7287-4071

 

Irina S. Sinitsina

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher, Center for East European Studies, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-9177-6642

 

ECONOMIC RELATIONS BETWEEN RUSSIA AND CEE COUNTRIES UNDER GEOPOLITICAL CRISIS

Размер файла134-156 Размер файла  935.99 KB Размер файла Full text

Abstract

The article discusses the following topics: trends in the development of trade relations between the CEE countries and Russia, participation of these countries in the economic war between Russia and the West, the impact of sanctions on economic relations of the CEE countries with Russia, the processes of circumventing sanctions and organizing schemes for exporting dual-use goods to Russia, and the withdrawal of CEE companies from Russia. Particular attention is paid to the consequences of both the energy crisis and the restructuring of resource supply chains for the economies of CEE countries. It is concluded that anti-Russian sanctions and the energy crisis have caused more significant damage to the economies of CEE countries compared to most other EU countries, and that there are little chances for the restoration of economic ties between Russia and CEE countries in the current geopolitical situation.

Keywords: Russia, Eastern Europe, trade, energy carriers, sanctions, energy crisis, economic war, inflation, economic growth.

JEL: F51

EDN: MCAYHP

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_6_134_156

References

  1. Asian Vector in the Economic Strategy of the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe: Monograph / Ed. by N.V. Kulikova. Moscow, IE RAS, 2019. (In Russ.).
  2. Kulikova N.V., Sinitsina I.S. Russia and the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe: A New Iron Curtain // Society and Economy. 2022. No. 12. Pp. 16–37. (In Russ.).
  3. Kulikova N.V., Sinitsina I.S. Trade Relations of Russia with the Countries of Central and Eastern Europe // Contemporary Europe. 2019. No. 3. Pp. 150–160. (In Russ.).
  4. Litvinenko Yu., Zanina A. Parallel import of sanctions. The new EU anti-Russian package will complicate the life of third countries // Kommersant, 24.06.2023. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/6067229 (accessed: 22.09.2023). (In Russ.).
  5. The Russian “Neighborhood Belt” in the Context of the Sanctions War: Research Report / Ed. by L.B. Vardomsky (guest editor), I.A. Korgun, N.V. Kulikova, A.G. Pylin. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2022. (In Russ.).
  6. Seveeva K., Kusmaev P. 11th package of EU sanctions. 28.06.2023. https://ktaplaw.ru/tpost/3go8k54bc1-11-paket-sanktsii-es (accessed: 22.09.2023). (In Russ.).
  7. Abnett К. EU countries rubber-stamp emergency gas cuts, Poland and Hungary
  8. 05.08.2022. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/eu-countries-rubberstamp-emergency-gas-cuts-poland-hungary-oppose-2022-08-05/ (accessed: 03.11.2023).
  9. Borin A. et al. The impact of EU sanctions on Russian imports. 29.05.2023. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/impact-eu-sanctions-russian-imports (accessed: 05.11.2023).
  10. Ai. Russia Sanctions Dashboard, as of 16 October 2023. https://www.castellum.ai/russia-sanctions-dashboard (accessed: 04.10.2023).
  11. European Commission. Questions and answers on the 11th package of restrictive measures against Russia. 23.06.2023. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_23_3449 (accessed: 06.11.2023).
  12. EU energy mix and import dependency. 04.03.2022. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/images/2/24/EnergyMixDependencyImports_25-03-2022.xlsx (accessed: 14.04.2023).
  13. EU imports of energy products – latest developments. September 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=EU_imports_of_energy_products_-_latest_developments (accessed: 25.10.2023).
  14. Mauricas Z. Lithuania: Economic dependence on Russia. Nordea Research, 20 March 2014. https://corporate.nordea.com/api/research/attachment/7286 (accessed: 12.04.2023).
  15. Sgaravatti G., Tagliapietra S., Trasi C., Zachmann G. National policies to shield consumers from rising energy prices // Bruegel Datasets, 26 June 2023. https://www.bruegel.org/dataset/national-policies-shield-consumers-rising-energy-prices (accessed: 12.10.2023).
  16. Suraj A. Warszawa, Kreml i Mińsk chcą zniszczyć polski przemysł drzewny // Obserwator Gospodarczy. 17.09.2023. https://obserwatorgospodarczy.pl/2023/09/17/warszawa-kreml-i-minsk-chca-zniszczyc-polski-przemysl-drzewny/ (accessed: 03.10.2023).
  17. Yale School of Management. Over 1,000 Companies Have Curtailed Operations in Russia – But Some Remain. October 1, 2023. https://som.yale.edu/story/2022/over-1000-companies-have-curtailed-operations-russia-some-remain (accessed: 19.10.2023).

Manuscript submission date: 21.10.2023 

For citation:

Kulikova N.V., Sinitsina I.S. Economic relations between Russia and CEE countries under geopolitical crisis// Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2023. № 6. Pp. 134-156. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_6_134_156 EDN: MCAYHP

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 6/2023.  World Economy.

Agnessa V. Avilova

Cand. Sci (Econ.), Leading Researcher, Center for European Studies, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAN), Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-5942-6095

 

GREENING ITALIAN AGRICULTURE

Размер файла157-171  Размер файла  310.41 KB Размер файла Full text

Abstract

The article examines the state and problems of the Italian agriculture in the context of the transition to technological structure 4.0. The author examines the targets of the EU common agricultural policy at the present stage, the advantages and limitations of the Italian agriculture in the context of the goals and objectives of the ecological transition, and measures of state support for its modernization. Data from expert studies on Italy’s progress towards sustainable agriculture are presented. A conclusion is made about the tangible impact of national conditions on the course of technological restructuring.

Keywords: Italy, ecological transition, agriculture. technology 4.0.

JEL: Q17.

EDN: PRSCJM

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_6_157_171

 

References

  1. Innovatsionnoje razvitije agropromyshlennogo kompleksa v Rossii. Agricullture 4.0 / Nauchnyi doklad NRU HSE. M., 2020. Pр. 56–59. (In Russ).
  2. Regionalnaya tehnicheskaya platforma po voprosam zelenogo selskogo hozyaistva. https://www.fao/org/platforms/green-agriculture/ru (In Russ).
  3. Strategic Framework 2022–2031. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Conference. March 2021. https://www.fao/org/platforms/green-agriculture/abjut/ru (In Russ).
  4. Obzor meghdunarodnodo opyta gosudarstvennoy podderghki razvitiya organicheskogo selskogo khozyaistva. https://eec.eaeunion.org/comission/department/dep-agropro...pdf. C. 5–17. (In Russ).
  5. Strany ES khotyat uvelichit’ podderghku organicheskogo selskogo khozyaistva I agrolesovodstva do 20% ot vsego biudgheta na APK. https:// soz.bio/strany-es-khotyat. (In Russ).
  6. Cappellini M. Strategia europea per l’agricoltura,rischio tagli alle produzione italiane // Il Sole 24 Ore. 28.01.2022.
  7. Rapporto sull’agroalimentatre italiano 2023. agricolae.eu. C. 87, 143.
  8. Glansanti M. Export agricolo puo’ salire a 100 miliardi // Il Sole 24 Ore. 8.08.2023.
  9. Fortis M. Agricoltura, il duello Italia – Francia // Il Sole 24 Ore. 6.08.2023.
  10. Barilla Center for Food Nutrition. Food Sustainability Index 2017.
  11. L’Italie lance un Erasmus pour les agriculteurs bio // Les Echos. 20.11.2019.
  12. Green Italy 2022. Un’economia a misura d’uomo contro le crisi. https://www.greennie.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/rapporto-dreenitaly2022.pdf.
  13. Manuelli M. Per le imprese famigliari dell’agroalimentare troppi debiti nei conti // Il Sole 24 Ore. 3.04.2021.
  14. Doganello S. Crisi idrica, necesssari 50 miliardi in 10 anni per superare l’emergenza // Il Sole 24 Ore. 1.09.2023.
  15. Sostenibilita’, l’Italia arretra: in ritardo gli obiettivi del 2030 // Il Sole 24 Ore. 20.10.2023.
  16. Agricoltura, la rivoluzione sostenibile all’italiana. https://www.repubblica.it/economia/rapporti/osserva-italia/mercati/2020/01/22/news/agricoltura_la_rivoluzione...
  17. Delle Orefice G. Dalla frutta al latte torna protagonist la cooperation // Il Sole 24 Ore. 24.04.2021.
  18. Cappellini M. Dal vino ai formaggi piccolo distretti sostengono la crescita // Il Sole 24 Ore. 3.05.2023.
  19. L’impatto sul settore agroalimentare. https://www.universofood.net/2022/02/11/pnrr-settore-agroalimentare/
  20. Frei M. Serve un’azione decisa all’interno del PNRR // Il Sole 24 Ore. 2.07.2023.
  21. Agricoltura 4.0: cresce la diffusion, ma le imprese piu’ piccolo rimangono indietro. agronotizie.imagelinenetwork.com
  22. Boom delle agroalimentare 4.0: in Italia il mercato cresce (+270%) e vale 400 milioni di euro. https://www.innovationpost.it/2019/02/12/boom-dellagroalimentare...
  23. Vesentini J. Nasce una super Universita’ per il food, alleanza tra atenei in Emilia Romagna // Il Sole 24 Ore. 19.07.2022; Cappellini M. Napoli, il polo Agritech avvia l’assunzione di 200 ricercatori // Il Sole 24 Ore. 22.07.2022.
  24. Agroalimentare: startup Apio lancia Trusty, piattaforma blockchain. https://www.adncronos.com/agroalimentare-startup...
  25. Agricoltura 100. Sintesi del Rapporto 2020. Agricoltura100.Sintesi-Rapporto-Reale-Mutua-Confagricoltura.pdf.

Manuscript submission date: 27.10.2023

For citation:

Avilova A.V. Greening Italian agriculture // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2023. № 6. Pp. 157-171. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_6_157_171 EDN: PRSCJM

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 5/2023.  World Economy.

Bongchul Kim

Ph.D in Law (King’s College London), Professor, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Republic of Korea

 

Irina A. Korgun

Ph.D. (Economics), Lead Research Fellow, Institute of Economics RAS, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-1496-4375

 

LEGAL FOUNDATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BILATERAL RELATIONS BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION

Размер файла166-180 Размер файла  313.28 KB Размер файла Full text

Abstract

The Korea-EU relation has developed based on multilateral and bilateral legal infrastructures. Among the international legal document, the three bilateral agreements between Korea and EU provide the foundational basis for the bilateral relations. First agreement is the Korea-EU FTA which effectively became a legal tool creating favorable environment for development of the economic relations between the parties. Second is Korea-EU Framework Agreement, amended in 2010. It proclaimed a strategic partnership between Korea and the EU elevating the status of cooperation. Third is the Agreement establishing a framework for the participation of Korea in EU crisis management operations. This agreement created a new cooperation field between the partners.

The documents described above represent international legal infrastructures that directly regulate Korea-EU cooperation activities and in this they differ from multilateral documents such as the WTO or the UN laws which can provide rules for certain areas of bilateral cooperation but are not directly related to Korea-EU relations. International laws are cohesively becoming important in areas beyond trade relations and in future may change the paradigm of their bilateral dialogue. Although the two partners may have some challenges and different views of the laws and their application, they main purpose is to provide significant new engines in boosting cooperation between the partners.

Keywords: bilateral relations, Korea, EU, international law, FTA.

JEL: F50, K33

EDN: QBCIOJ

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_5_166_180

References

  1. Park Sung-Hoon. Regionalism, Open Regionalism and Article XXIV GATT: Conflict and Harmony. In: Snyder, Francis (ed.) Regional and Global Regulation of International Trade, Hart Publishing, Oxford. 2002. P. 275.
  2. Winters L. Alan. Preferential Trading Agreements: Friend or Foe? In: Bagwell, Kyle W., Mavroidis, Petros C. (Eds.) Preferential Trade Agreements-A Law and Economics Analysis, Cambridge University Press. 2011. P. 7.
  3. Kim Bong-Chul, Shin Eui-Chan, Park Kyung-Eun. Establishing EU Norms as a Global Actor: Application of New Concepts in FTAs // Journal of Global Business and Trade. 2023. Vol. 19. No. 1. Pp. 75–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.20294/jgbt.2023.19.1.75
  4. Kim Bongchul. The Legal Tools for the Economic Cooperation between Korea and the Czech Republic. In: Moon Jaewan, Tomasek Michal (eds.). Law Crossing Eurasia: From Korea to the Czech Republic, Science & New Media. Passau-Berlin-Prague. 2015. Pp. 194–195.
  5. Eeckhout Piet. The EU and its Member States in the WTO. In: Bartels, Lorand, Ortino, Federico (eds.). Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006. P. 463.
  6. Šedová Edita, Müller David. European Union-Korea Free Trade Agreement. In: Czech yearbook of Public and Private International Law. Vol. 3. Czech Society of International Law. 2002. Р. 264.
  7. Kim Ho, Yoon Seok-Man. The Effects of Korean Trade-Related Laws on East Asian Developing Countries: Focusing on Sustainable Development Issues during the COVID-19 Outbreak // Journal of International Trade & Commerce. 2020. Vol. 16. No. 6. Pp. 247–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.16980/jitc.16.6.202012.247
  8. Park Chang-Hyun. The Role of the National Assembly in the Process of Trade Negotiation. Korea Legislation Research Institute. 2008. Pp. 177–178.
  9. Bongchul Kim. The changes of Korean Domestic Laws with the FTA system // Chonbuk Law Review. Vol. 44, May 2015. Рp. 424–427.
  10. Bongchul Kim and Ho Kim. Analysis and Proposals to the Laws in the Kaesong Industrial Complex: For Better Regulations under New Environments on the Korean Peninsula // Korea Journal. Vol. 54. No. 4. 2014. P. 95.
  11. Lefkowitz Jay. Freedom for all Koreans // The Wall Street Journal. April 28, 2006. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB114617333924237945 (accessed: 23.09.2023).
  12. Lee Tae Joo. Korea Joins the Big League with a Donor-centric Approach. In: Wilks, Alex. (Ed.), Aid and Development Effectiveness: Towards Human Rights, Social Justice and Democracy, Reality of Aid 2010. IBON Books. Philippines. 2010. P. 234.
  13. Bong-Chul Kim, Eui-Chan Shin, Kyung-Eun Park. Establishing EU Norms as a Global Actor: Application of New Concepts in FTAs // Journal of Global Business and Trade. Vol. 19. No. 1 (February 2023). Р. 7–589. http://dx.doi.org/10.20294/jgbt.2023.19.1.75

Manuscript submission date: 19.09.2023

For citation:

Kim B.Ch., Korgun I.A. Legal Foundations for the Development of Bilateral Relations beetween the Repablic of Korea and the European Union // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2023. № 5. Pp. 166-180. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_5_166_180 EDN: QBCIOJ

  Creative Commons 4.0

  1. Dadabayeva Z.A. COOPERATION OF THE CASPIAN COUNTRIES IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL SPHERE: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS
  2. Chernova V.Yu., Pylin A.G. THE INFLUENCE OF GEOPOLITICAL FACTORS ON THE ECONOMIC POLICIES AND INTEGRATION PROCESSES OF CENTRAL ASIAN COUNTRIES
  3. Chetverikova A.S. TRANSFORMATION OF INVESTMENT TIES OF BALTIC STATES AND POLAND
  4. Vasilchenko A.D., Logvinov D.V., Semenova A.A. NON-PRICE DEMAND FACTORS FOR WHEAT IMPORTS IN NORTH AFRICAN COUNTRIES

© Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2021 - 2024

32, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, Moscow, Russia 117218, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Phone.: +7 (499) 724-13-91, E-mail: vestnik-ieran@inbox.ru

  

Russian version

HOME

JOURNAL DESCRIPTION

General information

Editorial policies

Author guidelines

LATEST ISSUE

ARCHIVE

Editorial advisory board

Editorial team

Author guidelines

Submit article