The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 3/2025. World Economy. 

Dostonbek U. Samandarov

PhD student at the Academy of Public Policy and Administration under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan

 

FOREIGN EXPERIENCE IN FINANCING THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM

Размер файла199-212 Размер файла  395.93 KB Размер файла Full text

This article analyzes international experiences in financing healthcare systems, conducts a study of various healthcare financing models in developed countries. The sources of financing the health care system and ways to ensure its financial sustainability, as well as the level of accessibility of medical services for the population in Sweden, Germany, Austria and South Korea are considered.

According to the research findings, there is no single perfect model; rather, each country must approach healthcare financing based on its economic and demographic conditions.

Keywords: healthcare system, financing, Beveridge model, Bismarck model, health insurance, international experience.

JEL: I18, H51

EDN: ZRUZWK

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_199_212

References

  1. Janlöv N., Blume S., Glenngård A. H., Hanspers K., Anell A., & Merkur, S. Sweden: Health System Review. Health systems in transition. 2023. No. 25 (4). Pp. 1–236.
  2. Carlsson P. Priority setting in health care: Swedish efforts and experiences // Scand JPublic Health. 2010, Aug. No. 38 (6). Pp. 561–564. DOI: 10.1177/140349 48103 77406.
  3. Nutan Shashi Tigga, Vikash R. Keshri. Changing perspectives of public health in India: the growing role of health economics: [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] // Gates Open Research. London (Feb. 3, 2020). DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13109.1.
  4. Reinhardt U.E. The many different prices paid to providers and the flawed theory of cost shifting: Is it time for a more rational all-payer system? // Health Affairs. 2011. No. 30 (11). Pp. 2125–2133.
  5. Blümel M., Spranger A., Achstetter K., Maresso A., Litvinova Y., Busse R. Germany: Health system summary, 2022 // European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. https://eurohealthobservatory.who.int/publications/i/germany-healthsystemsummary-2022
  6. Omelyanovsky V.V., Maksimova L.V., Tatarinov A.P. Foreign experience: models of financing and organization of healthcare systems // Financial Journal. 2014. No. 3 (21). Pp. 22–34. (In Russ.).

Manuscript submission date: 02.04.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 30.06.2025

 

For citation:

Samandarov D.U. Foreign Experience in Financing the Healthcare System // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 3. Pp. 199-212. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_199_212 EDN: ZRUZWK

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 3/2025. World Economy. 

Georgii D. Paksiutov

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher, Center for Japanese Studies, Institute of China and Contemporary Asia, the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-7153-4315

 

JAPAN AND SOUTH KOREA’S CREATIVE INDUSTRIES: COMPETITION AND THE PROSPECTS OF COOPERATION

Размер файла181-198 Размер файла  341.31 KB Размер файла Full text

The article examines a number of trends defining the specific characteristics and the global standing of the creative industries in Japan and South Korea. We highlight Japan’s relative resistance to the processes of digitalization of production and distribution on the cultural markets. In contrast, South Korean popular culture industries have been developing in close cooperation with the information technology industry since the 1990s. We examine the factors that could contribute to the success of the currently expanding collaboration between Japan and South Korea in the production of cultural goods. It is emphasized that the concept of the creative industries in its current form implies the danger of instrumentalization of culture.

Keywords: creative industries, cultural industries, cultural goods, Japan-South Korea economic relations, «Korean wave», Cool Japan.

JEL: Z1, N75

EDN: ZBVZUK

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_181_198

References

  1. Towse R. Creative Industries // Towse R., Navarrete Hernández T. (eds.). Handbook of Cultural Economics (Third edition). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020. Pp. 137–144.
  2. Muzychuk V.Yu. Creative Industries: Challenges for the Non-Commercial Segment of the Cultural Sector // The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023. No. 5. Pp. 7–39. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2023_5_7_39. EDN: BXIKUF.
  3. Demir E.M. On the Current Situation of Creative Industries in Turkey // Etkileşim. 2022. № 9. Pp. 224–239. DOI: 10.32739/etkilesim.2022.5.9.162.
  4. Kim S. Aggressive Yet Benign: Korea’s Engagement in Creative Industries in Africa // International Journal of Cultural Policy. Vol. 26. № 7. Pp. 929–941. DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2020.1828383.
  5. Scott A. Hollywood and the World: The Geography of Motion-Picture Distribution and Marketing // Review of International Political Economy. 2004. Vol. 11. № 1. Pp. 33–61.
  6. Lee H.-K. Introduction: Understanding of the Cultural and Creative Industries in Asia // Lim L., Lee H.-K. (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Cultural and Creative Industries in Asia. London and New York: Routledge, 2019. 24–39.
  7. Newsinger J.A. A Cultural Shock Doctrine? Austerity, the Neoliberal State and the Creative Industries Discourse // Media, Culture & Society. 2015. Vol. 37. № 2. 302–313.
  8. Beirne M. et al. Autonomy and Resilience in Cultural Work: Looking Beyond the ‘Creative Industries’ // Journal for Cultural Research. 2017. Vol. 21. № 2. DOI: 10.1080/14797585.2016.1275311.
  9. Flew T., Cunningham S. Creative Industries after the First Decade of Debate // The Information Society: An International Journal. 2010. Vol. 26. № 2. Pp. 113–123. DOI: 10.1080/01972240903562753.
  10. Oyama S. In the closet: Japanese Creative Industries and their Reluctance to Forge Global and Transnational Linkages in ASEAN and East Asia // ERIA Discussion Paper Series. 2019. Vol. 295. Pp. 1–25.
  11. Jin D.Y. The Korean Government’s New Cultural Policy in the Age of Social Media // Kawashima N., Lee H.-K. (eds.). Asian Cultural Flows: Cultural Policies, Creative Industries, and Media Consumers. Singapore: Springer, 2020. Pp. 3–17.
  12. Otmazgin N. State Intervention Does Not Support the Development of the Media Sector: Lessons from Korea and Japan // Global Policy. 2020. Vol. 11. № S2. Pp. 40–46. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12821.
  13. McGray D. Japan’s Gross National Cool // Foreign Policy. Vol. 130. Pp. 44–54. DOI: 10.2307/3183487.
  14. Paksiutov G.D. Economic Contribution of Japan’s Content Industry // Japanese Studies in Russia. 2019. No. 1. Pp. 51–72. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2500-2872-2019-10004. EDN: ZCWHWX.
  15. Steinberg M. The Platform Economy: How Japan Transformed the Consumer Internet. Minneapolis and London: Minnesota University Press, 2019.
  16. Matsui T. Nation branding through stigmatized popular culture: The «Cool Japan» craze among central ministries in Japan // Hitotsubashi Journal of Commerce and Management. 2014. Vol. 48. № 1. Pp. 81–97.
  17. Rubinshtein A.Ya. Creative Economy of the Paternalistic State: What Does the Coming Day Hold for Us? // Journal of the New Economic Association. 2022. Vol. 54. No. 2. Pp. 209–212. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2022-54-2-11. EDN:
  18. Kawashima N. ‘Cool Japan’ and Creative Industries: An Evaluation of Economic Policies for Popular Culture Industries in Japan // Asian Cultural Flows: Cultural Policies, Creative Industries, and Media Consumers. Pp. 18–36.
  19. Kwon S., Kim J. The cultural industry policies of the Korean government and the Korean Wave // International Journal of Cultural Policy. 2014. Vol. 20. № 4. 422–439. DOI: 10.1080/10286632.2013.829052.
  20. Jin D.Y. Construction of Digital Korea: The Evolution of New Communication Technologies in the 21st Century // Media, Culture & Society. 2017. Vol. 39. № 5. 715–726. DOI: 10.1177/0163443717709441.
  21. Jung S. Korean Masculinities and Transcultural Consumption: Yonsama, Rain, Oldboy, K-pop Idols. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2011.
  22. Lee H.-K., Lim L. Culture, Digitalization and Diversity: Asian Perspectives // Routledge Handbook of Cultural and Creative Industries in Asia. Pp. 527–547.
  23. Kim Y. Sell Your Loneliness: Mukbang Culture and Multisensorial Capitalism in South Korea // Routledge Handbook of Cultural and Creative Industries in Asia. Pp. 363–382.
  24. Putnam R.D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000.
  25. Kistanov V.O. Relations between Japan and South Korea: Problems, Trends, Perspectives // Japanese Studies in Russia. 2019. No. 3. Pp. 33–48. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2500-2872 2019-10019. EDN: VNXHTQ.
  26. Chua B.H., Iwabuchi K. Introduction // Chua B.H., Iwabuchi K. (eds.). East Asian Pop Culture: Analyzing the Korean Wave. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2008. Pp. 1–12.
  27. Toshiyuki B. Changes in International Competition Regarding Auto-parts in China, Korea, and Japan // Journal of International Economic Studies. 2016. Vol. 30. Pp. 27–40. DOI: 10.15002/00012843.
  28. Bown C.P. How the United States Marched the Semiconductor Industry into its Trade War with China // East Asian Economic Review. 2020. Vol. 24. № 4. Pр. 349–388. DOI: 10.11644/KIEP.EAER.2020.24.4.384.
  29. Gnyavali D.R., Park B.-J. Co-opetition Between Giants: Collaboration with Competitors for Technological Innovation // Research Policy. 2011. Vol. 40. № 5. Pp. 650–663.
  30. Kuwahara Y. Introduction // Kuwahara Y. (ed.). The Korean Wave: Korean Popular Culture in Global Context. New York: Pulgrave Macmillan, 2014. Pp. 1–12.
  31. Shin S., Balistreri J. The Other Trade War: Quantifying the Korea-Japan Trade Dispute // Journal of Asian Economics. 2022. Vol. 79. DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2022.101442.
  32. Hoskins C., Mirus R. Reasons for the US Dominance of the International Trade in Television Industry // Media, Culture & Society. 1988, Vol. 10. № 4. Pp. 499–515.
  33. Takara Y. Do Cultural Differences Affect the Trade of Cultural Goods? A Study of Trade in Music // Journal of Cultural Economics. 2017. Vol. 42. №. 3. Pp. 393–417.
  34. Holloway I.R. Foreign Entry, Quality, and Cultural Distance: Product-Level Evidence from US Movie Exports // Review of World Economics. 2014. Vol. 150. Pp. 371-392. DOI: 10.1007/s10290-013-0180-3.
  35. Kuwahara Y. Hanryu: Korean Popular Culture in Japan // The Korean Wave: Korean Popular Culture in Global Context. Pp. 213–222.
  36. Iwabuchi K. Recentering Globalization: Popular Culture and Japanese Transnationalism. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2002.
  37. Бурдье П. Формы капитала // Экономическая социология. Т. 3. № 5. С. 60–74. [Bourdieu P. Forms of Capital // Economic Sociology. 2002. Vol. 3. No. 5. Pp. 60–74. (In Russ.)].
  38. de Valck M. Film Festivals: From European Geopolitics to Global Cinephilia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007.
  39. Paksiutov G.D. «Soft Power» and «Cultural Capital» of Nations: The Case of Film Industry // World Economy and International Relations. 2020. Vol. 64. No. 11. Pp. 106–113. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-11-106-113. EDN: HWSIJI.
  40. Rubinshtein A.Ya., Burakov N.A. Cultural Economics. Moscow: Studio School Moscow Art Academic Theater, State Institute of Art Studies, 2024. (In Russ.). EDN: GHRTJJ.

Manuscript submission date: 20.04.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 30.06.2025

 

For citation:

Paksiutov G.D. Japan and South Korea’s Creative Industries: Competition and the Prospects of Cooperation// Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 3. Pp. 181-198. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_181_198  EDN: ZBVZUK

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 3/2025. World Economy. 

Vlas A. Ryazanov

Cand.Sci. (Geogr.), Senior Researcher, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

 

FACTORS OF PRICING OF RUSSIAN POLYETHYLENE AND POLYPROPYLENE ON CHINESE MARKET

Размер файла148-160 Размер файла  584.85 KB Размер файла Full text

The author studies the ratio of import prices for individual grades of Russian polyethylene and polypropylene in China to the average for all suppliers to this market in monthly dynamics. The regression analysis provided correct models of the dependence of this indicator on non-economic (the events of February 2022) and market factors, which showed the decisive contribution of geopolitical reasons to the increase in discounts on all Russian polyolefins from 10% to more than 20%. The negative impact of total import volumes on the pricing of Russian polymers in China, which is thus a “buyer’s market” for Russian companies, has been revealed. The described phenomenon is stable, spreads to other large markets for Russian polymers, creates risks for the long-term development of the industry and requires corrective measures of the country’s trade policy.

Keywords: Russia, China, export, polyethylene, polypropylene, prices, regression analysis.

JEL: С22, F14, L65

EDN: WPXPUU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_148_160

References

  1. Bulletin of chemical industry. No. 2 (14). M.: NIITECHEM, 2000. (In Russ.).
  2. Gloveli G., Spaderova A. Peripetics of “tutelary protectionism” // Issues of economic theory. 2019. No. 2. Pp. 62-81. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2587-7666-2019-10205. EDN: DSHZZI.
  3. Gulina S.T. Ethylene market in Russia: overview, analysis, prospects // Economics and management: problems, solutions. 2024. Vol. 1. No. 10. Pp. 60–67. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2024.10.01.007. EDN: EGJCIT.
  4. Derushkin D., Khazova Т., Gatunok А. Petrochemicals: realities and challenges // Energy policy. 2020. No. 11. Pp. 40–55. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.46920/2409-5516_2020_11153_40. EDN: NWHMQM
  5. Karpov A.L. Competitive position of oil-processing and petrochemical branches of Russian economy // Bulletin of Omsk university. Series: Economics. 2010. No. 3. Pp. 48–53. (In Russ.). EDN: NAWSZB.
  6. Kryukov V.A., Shmat V.V. Petrochemical industry in the Russian East – driving the economy of dragging in down? // The region: economy and sociology. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 270–300. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15372/REG20200311. EDN: FLZQFN.
  7. Ogrel L. How the polyethylene has withstood // InfoTEK. 2024. June 24. (In Russ.). https://itek.ru/reviews/kak-vystoyal-polietilen
  8. Ryazanov V. Chemicals for exchange // Expert. 2021. No. 41. Pp. 41–43. (In Russ.). https://monocle.ru/expert/2021/41/khimiya-poshla-na-razmen
  9. Рязанов В. Что мы нахимичили // Эксперт. № 4. С. 40–47. [Ryazanov V. What chemistry we have made // Expert. 2021. No. 4. Pp. 40–47. (In Russ.).] https://monocle.ru/expert/2021/04/chto-mi-nakhimichili
  10. Savinskaya M.E. Causes of decline and reasons of revival of chemical industry of Russia // Problems of forecasting. 2000. No. 3. Pp. 34–43. (In Russ.). EDN: HRTEAH.
  11. Sergeeva O.A, Buliskeriya G.N., Petrushkin S.I. Russian petrochemical industry – the time of growth // Problems of economics and management of oil and gas sector. 2021. No. 2. Pp. 11–19. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33285/1999-6942-2021-2(194)-11-19. EDN: CCNINF.
  12. Strelnikova L. The main chemist of the country // Chemistry and life. 2015. No. 8. (In Russ.). https://www.hij.ru/read/issues/2015/august/5543
  13. Cherepovitsyn A.E., Riadinskaia A.P. The potential for the development of the gas chemistry market in Russia and in the world: the case of technological chain for the polystyrene production // Economy, business and law. 2023. Vol. 13. No. 12. Pp. 5949–5962. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/epp.13.12.120188. EDN: FRLQZX.
  14. Shurakov A. Prospects of Russian polymers // Neftegaz.ru business journal. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 20–26. (In Russ.). https://magazine.neftegaz.ru/articles/pererabotka/661200-perspektivy-rossiyskikh-polimerov/ EDN: ADDWOH.
  15. Richardson J. The big changes in China’s LLDPE market and what could happen next // ICIS. 2025. January 29. https://www.icis.com/asian-chemical-connections/2025/01/thebig-changes-in-chinas-lldpe-market-and-what-could-happen-next

Manuscript submission date: 18.03.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 30.06.2025

 

For citation:

Ryazanov V.A. Factors of Pricing of Russian Polyethylene and Polypropylene on Chinese Market // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 3. Pp. 148-160. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_148_160 EDN: WPXPUU

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 3/2025. World Economy. 

Olga D. Ismagilova

Researcher of the Institute for International Economics and Finance, Russian Foreign Trade Academy, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-3092-770X

 

Veronika N. Popova

Researcher of the Institute for International Economics and Finance, Russian Foreign Trade Academy, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-7931-850X

 

ANALYSIS OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR RUSSIA AND KAZAKHSTAN COOPERATION ON VALUE CHAINS DEVELOPMENT IN THE METALLURGICAL INDUSTRY

Размер файла161-180  Размер файла  330.68 KB Размер файла Full text

The article examines the main characteristics of countries’ participation in global value chains, key types, and the extent of their influence on world trade. There is an analysis of Russian and Kazakhstan participation in global value chains as well as the share of foreign added value in the metallurgical industry of Russia and Kazakhstan. The current figures of trade and economic interaction of both countries, including their cooperation in the investment sphere are regarded. Particular attention is paid to the study of metallurgical industry of Kazakhstan as one of the priority directions of industrial production as well as statistics of export and import of specific products of mining and metallurgical sector of Kazakhstan. The article also considers the prospects of Russian and Kazakhstan cooperation expansion in the steel industry, and identifies specific metallurgical goods for which Russia has untapped export potential in the Kazakhstan market.

Keywords: Russia, Kazakhstan, metallurgical industry, export, import, global value chains, forward and backward participation, industry production, resources, critical goods.

JEL: F49, P23, P33

EDN: WNQBCE

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_161_180

References

  1. Trade policy implications of global value chains (OECD). https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2019/11/trade-policy-implications-of-globalvalue-chains_f182d1f5/4989ef9e-en.pdf
  2. Borinm A., Mancini M., Taglioni D. Economic consequences of trade and global value chain Integration. A Measurement Perspective (World bank group), September 2021. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/476361632831927312/pdf/Economic-Consequences-of-Trade-and-Global-Value-Chain-Integration-A-Measurement-Perspective.pdf
  3. Nur C., Inmaculada M.-Z. The impact of global value chain participation on income inequality. International Economics, Vol. 169, May 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.inteco.2022.02.002.
  4. Global value chain development report 2023: Resilient and sustainable GVCs in turbulent times. Research Institute for Global Value Chains at the University of International Business and Economics, ADB, the Institute of Developing Economies – Japan External Trade Organization and the WTO, 2023. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gvc_dev_rep23_e.pdf
  5. Ralph Ossa. Pillar of economic security (International Monetary Fund).
  6. Fernandes A., Hiau Looi Kee, Deborah Winkler. Determinants of Global Value Chain Participation Cross-Country Evidence. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/930751585234915451/pdf/Determinants-of-Global-Value-Chain-Participation-Cross-Country-Evidence.pdf
  7. Trade in Value Added and Global Value Chains Country profiles explanatory notes (WTO) https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/miwi_e/explanatory_notes_e.pdf.
  8. Nebojša Stojčić, Matija Matić. A journey toward global value chain upgrading: Exploring the transition from backward to forward integration. Technology in Society, Vol. 76. March 2024. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160791X23002403.
  9. Interconnected Economies Benefiting from Global value chains (OECD). https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/interconnected-economies_9789264189560-en.html
  10. Josephine Wuri, Tri Widodo, Amirullah Setya Hardi. Speed of convergence in global value chains: Forward or backward linkage. Heliyon. Vol. 9. Iss. 7. July 2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023052787
  11. Koen De Backer, Sébastien Miroudot. Mapping Global Value Chains. OECD Trade Policy Papers No. 159. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/ publications/reports/2013/12/ mapping-global-value-chains_g17a2429/5k3v1trgnbr4-en.pdf
  12. Navarro О. Features of value-added chains in metallurgy and metalworking in Russia. http://edoc.bseu.by:8080/bitstream/edoc/102045/1/Navarro_119_126.pdf
  13. Mineral commodity summaries. U.S Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2023. https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2023/mcs2023.pdf (accessed: 15.01.2025).
  14. Mining Sector Diagnostics – Kazakhstan. (The World Bank), February, 2023. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099081823001511076/
    pdf/P176745032752e020ab830aca3807b2afc.pdf (accessed: 20.02.2025). (In Russ).

Manuscript submission date: 13.02.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 30.06.2025

 

For citation:

Ismagilova O.D., Popova V.N. Analysis of Opportunities for Russia and Kazakhstan Cooperation on Value Chains Development in the Metallurgical Industry // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 3. Pp. 161-180. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_3_161_180 EDN: WNQBCE

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 2/2025. World Economy. 

Artem G. Pylin

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Docent, Associate Professor of the Department of International Business, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; Senior Research Fellow, Smolensk State University, Smolensk, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-1979-3624

 

CONTOURS OF TRADE INTERACTION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND BELARUS IN THE NEW GEOECONOMIC REALITY

Размер файла185-200 Размер файла  621.62 KB Размер файла Full text

The article studies the dynamics and structure of Russian-Belarusian trade relations over the past twelve years. It considers Belarus’ approaches to the multi-vector nature of its foreign economic course and their evolution under the influence of external factors. The main features of trade interaction between Russia and Belarus in the pre-sanctions and sanctions periods are highlighted. An analysis of interstate documents adopted in 2021-2024 years is carried out from the point of view of their impact on deepening economic integration within the Union State. The author concludes that the two countries are moving to a new stage of cooperation, namely from transit and energy to industrial and technological connectivity. Some recommendations for further economic interaction between the two countries are offered.

Keywords: Belarus, Russia, Union State, trade interaction, connectivity, sanctions, import substitution, fragmentation of the world economy.

JEL: F02, F14, F15

EDN: UWDDCL

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_2_185_200

References

  1. Astakhova S. Belarus: Relations with Russia in the Context of New Foreign Policy Realities // Russia and the New States of Eurasia, 2022, No. IV (LVII). Pp. 89–98. (In Russ.).
  2. Vardomsky L. Issues of Interfacing China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the Eurasian Economic Union Project // Society and Economy. 2024. No. 7–8. Pp. 112–126. (In Russ.).
  3. Vardomsky L. The Union State of Belarus – Russia in a Quarter of a Century: From a Clash of Interests to a New Model of Cooperation // The World of Change. 2024. No. 4. Pp. 75–90. (In Russ.).
  4. Kuzmina E.M. Dynamics of the Foreign Economic Strategy of the Republic of Belarus // ECO. 2022. No. 5 (575). Pp. 8–28. (In Russ.).
  5. Pylin A.G. Belarusian Business in the EAEU as a Factor of Regional Integration // Innovations and Investments. 2019. No. 10. Pp. 92–97. (In Russ.).
  6. Pylin A.G. Do Western Sanctions Accelerate the Economic Integration of Russia and Belarus? // The World of Changes. 2022. No. 4. Pp. 136–144. (In Russ.).
  7. Sibirskaya A. Results of Foreign Trade of the Republic of Belarus under the Conditions of Sanctions Pressure // Bankovski Vesnik. 2024. No. 2/727. Pp. 43–51. (In Russ.).
  8. Kheifets B.A. Will Modern Geopolitical Fragmentation Become a Long-Term Trend of New Regionalization of the Global Economic Space?: Scientific Report. M.: IE RAS, 2024. – 110 p. (In Russ.).
  9. Shurubovich A.V. Economic Interaction between Russia and Belarus: Integration Projects and National Interests. M.: IE RAS, 2018. – 96 p. (In Russ.).

Manuscript submission date: 10.03.2025

Manuscript acceptance date: 16.04.2025

 

For citation:

Pylin A.G. Contours of trade interaction between Russia and Belarus in the new geoeconomic reality// Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2025. № 2. Pp. 185-200. (In Russ.).  https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2025_2_185_200  EDN: UWDDCL

  Creative Commons 4.0

© Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2021 - 2024

32, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, Moscow, Russia 117218, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Phone.: +7 (499) 724-13-91, E-mail: vestnik-ieran@inecon.ru