Sukharev O.S. TECHNOLOGICAL SOVEREIGNTY OF RUSSIA: FORMATION ON THE BASIS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE "KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY" SECTOR

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 1/2024. Economics and Management.

Oleg S. Sukharev

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Chief Researcher at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-3436-7703

TECHNOLOGICAL SOVEREIGNTY OF RUSSIA: FORMATION ON THE BASIS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE "KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY" SECTOR

47-64

465.68 KB

Full text

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issues of technological sovereignty of the Russian economy. The main condition for its provision is the targeted formation and development of the “knowledge economy” sector. An approach to measuring technological sovereignty in specific areas of technological development and types of economic activity is proposed. Based on the results of a regression analysis of the relationship between the costs of internal research and development and the gross added value of the “knowledge economy” sector, it has been established that there is a problem associated with the effectiveness of these costs and their subordination exclusively to the task of developing the knowledge economy. It is concluded that new approaches are needed to the formation of a knowledge economy, which should be significantly expanded primarily by increasing costs allocated to the development of new technologies, maintaining existing standard technological chains, and increasing the efficiency of these costs. The research methodology included empirical, comparative, structural and regression analysis, as well as the author’s developments in the field of quantitative measurements. The application of the author's methodology for assessing the “knowledge economy” in Russia on economic development is shown – in terms of scale and contribution to the growth rate.

Keywords: “knowledge economy”, technology, research and development costs, technological sovereignty, economic growth, measurement methods.

JEL: O11, O33, O41

EDN: GBHZQW

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_1_47_64

References

Glazyev S.Yu. Theory of long-term technical and economic development. M.: VlaDar, 1993. (In Russ.).
Mensch G. Technological stalemate: innovation overcomes depression. M.: Economics, 2001. (In Russ.).
Perez K. Technological revolutions and financial capital. Dynamics of bubbles and periods of prosperity. M.: Publishing house “DELO”, 2011. (In Russ.).
Sukharev O.S. Economics of technological development. M.: Finance and Statistics, 2008. (In Russ.).
Sukharev O.S. Economics of industry, technology and intellectual firms. M.: Lenand, 2022. (In Russ.).
Helpman E. The mystery of economic growth. M.: Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 2011. (In Russ.).
Bassens D., Hendrikse R. Asserting Europe’s technological sovereignty amid American platform finance: Countering financial sector dependence on Big Tech? // Political Geography. 2022. 97(1):102648.
Breschi S., Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation // The Economic Journal. 2000. Vol. 110 (463). Pр. 388–410.
Caputo F. Reflecting upon knowledge management studies: insights from systems thinking // International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies. 2017. Vol. 8 (3–4), Рp. 177–190.
Caputo, F., Garcia-Perez, A., Cillo, V., & Giacosa, E. A knowledge-based view of people and technology: directions for a value co-creation-based learning organization // Journal of Knowledge Management. 2019. Vol. 23(7). Pр. 1314–1334.
Cheng M., Yang S., Wen Z. The effect of technological factors on industrial energy intensity in China: New evidence from the technological diversification // Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2021. Vol. 28. Pр. 775–785.
Crafts N. The First Industrial Revolution: Resolving the Slow Growth. Rapid Industrialization Paradox. Papers and Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Congress of the European Economic Association // Journal of the European Economic Association. 2005. Vol. 3. No. 2/3. Рp. 525–534.
Edler J., Blind K., Kroll H., Schubert T. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means // Research Policy. 2023. 52(6):104765.
Lu Y. Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues // Journal of Industrial Information Integration. 2017. Vol. 6. Рp. 1–10.
Philbeck T., Davis T. The Fourth Industrial Revolution // Journal of International Affairs. 2019. Vol. 72. No. 1. Рp. 17–22.
Ponte A., Leon G., Alvarez I. Technological sovereignty of the EU in advanced 5G mobile communications: An empirical approach. Telecommunications Policy. 2023. 47(7):102459.
Rifkin J. The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power Is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World. St. Martin's Griffin Pbl, 2011.

Manuscript submission date: 13.12.2023

For citation:

Sukharev O.S. Technological sovereignty of Russia: formation on the basis of the development of the "knowledge economy" sector // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. №. 1 Pp. 47-64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_1_47_64 EDN: GBHZQW

Creative Commons 4.0