The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 2/2024.  Economics and Management.

Yuriy A. Krupnov

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor of the Institute of Economic Policy and Economic Security Problems, Faculty of Economics and Business, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-9524-3747

Sergey N. Silvestrov

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Head of the Institute of Economic Policy and Economic Security Problems, Faculty of Economics and Business, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 000-0002-7678-1283

TECHNOLOGICAL SOVEREIGNTY AND DIFFUSION OF TECHNOLOGIES

31-48

354.32 KB

Full text

Abstract

The problem of reducing technological dependence is considered based on the use of the effect of technology diffusion. Under sanctions, this is one of the important areas of reducing the dependence of the economy. The analysis and prioritization of methods for borrowing technologies is carried out and the role of direct investment in combination with the localization of foreign production is shown. The directions for the most complete use of the effect of technology diffusion are substantiated. The stability and longevity of diffusion processes must be ensured by increasing the level of localization of high-tech foreign production. It is concluded that the further dynamics of technological development and the possibility of achieving a higher level of sovereignty depend on the ability of government and corporate governance bodies to adapt to the rapidly changing conditions of the global economy.

Keywords: economic development, technological sovereignty, diffusion of technologies, localization of foreign production.

JEL: F15, F52, G28

EDN: CBHKJQ

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_2_31_48

References

1. Sorokin D.E. Political Economy of Russia’s Technological Modernization. Economic Renaissance of Russia. 2020. No. 1. Рp. 18–25. https://elibrary.ru/jyylza. (In Russ).
2. Robertson P., Pol E., Carroll P. Receptive capacity of established industries as a limiting factor in the economy’s rate of innovation // Industry and Innovation. 2003. No. 10. Рp. 457–474. DOI: 10.1080/1366271032000163685.
3. Simachev Yu., Kuzyk M., Zudin N. Import dependence and import substitution in the Russian manufacturing industry: a business perspective // Foresight. 2016. No. 10(4). 25–45. (In Russ). DOI: 10.17323/1995-459X.2016.4.25.45.
4. Oruch T.A. Study of indicators and results of import substitution in Russian industry. Innovations and investments. 2023. No. 1 Рp. 289–293. EDN: TBIVIM. (In Russ).
5. Amirkhanova F.S., Tenyakov I.M. Issues of import substitution in the context of Russian Chinese economic cooperation. Russian Economic Journal. 2023. (2). Рр. 24–39. (In Russ). DOI: 10.52210/0130-9757_2023_2_24.
6. Tunzelmann N. Development and diffusion of technology. In: Lazonick W. (ed.). The IEBM Handbook of Economics. London: Thomson International. 2002. Рp. 90–97.
7. Vinslav Yu.B. Year 2020: on persistent reproductive threats and their neutralization on ways to improve strategic planning and industrial policy, deploy the national innovation system and its sectoral and regional subsystems. Russian Economic Journal. 2020. No. 1. Рp. 3–53. (In Russ). DOI: 10.33983/0130-9757-2020-1-3-53.
8. Zazdravnykh A.V. Factors of development of the dynamics of enterprises in the Russian manufacturing industry. Russian Economic Journal. 2022. No. 6. Рp. 111–128. https://doi.org/10.33983/0130-9757-2022-6-111-128. (In Russ).
9. Portyakov V.Ya. The Communist Party of China and the policy of foreign economic openness. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2021. No. 65 (7). Рp. 34–44. (In Russ). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-7-34-44.
10. Marshall A. Principles of economics. 9th (Variorum) ed. with annotations by C.W. Guillebaud. Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society. 1961. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL13776798M/Principles_of_economics.
11. Mogilevsky G.A. Parallel import as a form of implementation of the international principle of exhaustion of the exclusive right. International Journal of the Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2022. No. 4–2(67). Рp. 229–231. (In Russ). DOI: 10.24412/2500-1000-2022-4-2-229-231.
12. Latyntsev A.V. The difference between the legal nature of compulsory licensing and paid unlicensed use of objects of patent protection. Journal of Russian Law. 2023. No. 27(3). Рp. 56–68. (I n Russ). DOI: 10.12737/jrp.2023.029.
13. Krupnov Yu.A. Principles and mechanisms of technological development of the Russian economy. Innovative economy: prospects for development and improvement. 2023. 2 (68). Рp. 121–127. https://elibrary.ru/fvzems. (In Russ).
14. Valova Yu.I. Modern world economic crisis: probability and possible consequences. Banking. 2023. No. 6. Рp. 24–31. https://elibrary.ru/aftqhz. (In Russ).
15. Volkova T.I. Effective functioning of digital innovative technological platforms: institutional dimension. Russian Economic Journal. 2022. No. 5. Рp. 83–100. (In Russ). DOI: 10.33983/0130-9757-2022-5-83-100.
16. Robertson P., Jacobson D. Knowledge Transfer and Technology Diffusion. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011.
17. Zudin N.N. The relationship of the technological level of the sector with the characteristics of companies and state support. Innovations. 2015. No. 6. Рp. 61–70. https://elibrary.ru/uhppcf. (In Russ).

Manuscript submission date: 21.02.2024

For citation:

Krupnov Y.A., Silvestrov S.N. Technological sovereignty and diffusion of technologies // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 2. Pp. 31-48. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_2_31_48 EDN: CBHKJQ

  Creative Commons 4.0