The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 4/2024.  Finance.

Roza O. Voskanian

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Docent, Associate Professor of the Department of Financial and Investment Management, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-1690-8262

 

ECONOMIC ESSENCE OF MULTIPLE VOTING SHARES AND THE FEASIBILITY OF INTRODUCING THEM ON THE RUSSIAN FINANCIAL MARKET

Размер файла98-115 Размер файла  465.07 KB Размер файла Full text

Abstract

Entrepreneurs often encounter challenges related to capital dilution and diminished control over strategic development when forming equity capital. The author proposes the adoption of multiple voting shares as a potential solution to this problem. It has been disclosed that a joint-stock company can issue multiple voting shares at various stages of its life cycle. The circulation of these shares is limited due to their conversion into ordinary shares during purchase and sale transactions, or in case of a specified duration of circulation prohibition. The implementation of a voting multiplier has been announced; clarifying that possessing multiple voting shares does not entitle the owner to extra dividend payments. Conversely, multiple voting shares are transformed into common shares at a one-to-one ratio determined by market value. The result of the study of the economic essence of multiple voting shares was the identification and analysis of the option component of this security. Therefore, there exists the potential to adopt an innovative method of generating financing opportunities for the company by introducing multiple voting shares that encompass the advantages of ordinary shares and a derivative financial instrument.

Given the current state of the Russian financial market, where multiple voting shares are exclusively accessible to international companies, the author has developed proposals to modify the existing Russian legislation. These modifications will enable the standardization of equity formation practices among Russian joint-stock companies, while also enhancing the investment appeal of the Russian market for investors from allied states, where the trading of multiple voting shares is permitted.

Keywords: share, dual-class system, convertible securities, option, equity, financing.

JEL: G32, G23

EDN: QOAXDO

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_4_98_115

References

  1. Voskanian R.O. Dual-class system of capital company formation in the BRICS countries// MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2021. Vol. 12. № 3. Pp. 274–287.
  2. Voskanian R.O. Circulation regulations of multiple voting shares on the financial market of Asian countries// Banking services. 2024. №6. Pp. 27–32.
  3. Voskanian R.O. Comparative analysis of the financing instruments employed by the company// Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2024. Vol. 245. № Pp. 136–152.
  4. Ross S.A., Westerfield R.W., Jaffe J.F., Jordan B.D. Corporat e Finance. 11th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2016.
  5. Voskanian R.O. Dual-class system of capital company formation: American and British experience // ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, and Practice. 2021. № 1. Pp. 111–120.
  6. Rydqvist K. Dual-Class Shares: A Review // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 1992. Vol. 8 (3). Pp. 45–57.
  7. Vashchenko T.V. Optimization of the participation of foreign investors as a tool of the corporate control system of high-tech companies: the experience of China // Financial business. 2022. № 6 (228). Pp. 193–197. (In Russ.).
  8. Aggarwal D., Eldar O., Hochberg Y.V., Litov L.P. The rise of dual-class stock IPOs // Journal of Financial Economics. 2022. Vol. 144. I. 1. Pp. 122–153.
  9. Amoako-Adu B., Baulkaran V., Smith B.F. Executive compensation in firms with concentrated control: The impact of dual class structure and family management // Journal of Corporate Finance. 2011. Vol. 17. I. 5. Pp. 1580–1594.
  10. Hagelin N., Holmén M., Pramborg B. // Family ownership, dual-class shares, and risk management // Global Finance Journal. 2006. Vol. 16. I. 3. Pp. 283–301.
  11. Mazzi C. Family business and financial performance: Current state of knowledge and future research challenges // Journal of Family Business Strategy. 2011. Vol. 2. I. 3. Pp. 166–181.
  12. Ashraf R., Li H., Ryan H.E. Dual agency problems in family firms: Evidence from director elections // Journal of Corporate Finance. 2020. Vol. 62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101556.
  13. Villalonga B., Amit R. Family Control of Firms and Industries // Financial Management. 2010. Vol. 39. I. 3. Pp. 863–904.
  14. Cieślak K. Agency conflicts, executive compensation regulations and CEO payperformance sensitivity: evidence from Sweden. // Journal of Management and Governance. 2018. № 22. Pp. 535–563.
  15. Lim L. Dual-class versus single-class firms: information asymmetry // Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 2016. № 46. Pp. 763–791.
  16. Wang Y. The impact of private benefits on institutional ownership change: evidence from markets with different sentiments // Journal of Economics and Finance. 2014. № 38. Pp. 609–626.
  17. Venezze F.C. The Costs of Control-enhancing Mechanisms: How Regulatory Dualism Can Create Value in the Privatisation of State-owned Firms in Europe // European Business Organization Law Review. 2014. № 15. Pp. 499–544.
  18. Tinaikar S. Executive compensation disclosure and private control benefits: A comparison of U.S. and Canadian dual class firms // Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation. 2017. Vol. 29. Pp. 32–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2017.03.001.
  19. McGuire S.T., Wang D., Wilson R.J. Dual Class Ownership and Tax Avoidance // The Accounting Review. 2014. Vol. 89. № 4. Рp. 1487–1516.
  20. Heracleous L., Lan L.L. Concentrated Ownership, Socioemotional Wealth, and the “Third Possibility”: Bringing Society Back in // The Corporation: Rethinking the Iconic Form of Business Organization. 2022. Vol. 78. Рp. 13–30.
  21. Cremers M., Lauterbach B., Pajuste A. The Life Cycle of Dual-Class Firm Valuation // The Review of Corporate Finance Studies. 2022. DOI: 10.1093/rcfs/cfac026.
  22. Gompers P.A., Ishii J., Metrick A. Extreme Governance: An Analysis of Dual-Class Firms in the United States // The Review of Financial Studies. 2010. Vol. 23. № 3. Рp. 1051–1088.
  23. Dey A., Nikolaev V., Wang X. Disproportional control rights and the governance role of debt // Management Science. 2015. № 62 (9). Pp. 2581–2614.
  24. Ordov K.V. The impact of the financial crisis on the redistribution of financial resources of society // Financial Economics. 2020. № 5. Pp. 181–182. (In Russ.).

Manuscript submission date: 26.06.2024

For citation:

Voskanian R.O. Economic essence of multiple voting shares and the feasibility of introducing them on the russian financial market // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 4. Pp. 98-115. (In Russ.).  https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_4_98_115  EDN: QOAXDO

  Creative Commons 4.0

© Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2021 - 2024

32, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, Moscow, Russia 117218, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Phone.: +7 (499) 724-13-91, E-mail: vestnik-ieran@inbox.ru