The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 4/2023.  Finance.

Olga A. Lvova

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor at the Financial Management Department, School of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-9835-3418

 

BUSINESS EVALUATION WITHIN CRISIS MANAGEMENT: APPROACHES FOR OWNERS, CREDITORS, INSOLVENCY PRACTITIONERS AND INVESTORS

Размер файла89-111 Размер файла  1.67 MB Размер файла Full text

Abstract

The article suggests approaches to business evaluation by various stakeholders for crisis management purposes. For owners and managers, an identification system of business sustainability decline has been developed, including market, operational, investment, financial, managerial and organizational indicators. For creditors, a strategic map is proposed,

containing market, process, resource and financial triggers identified during express diagnostics and advanced trigger analysis. For insolvency practitioners, the methodology of financial analysis has been modified, supplemented by an algorithm for debtor’s transactions

analysis and identifying signs of “objective bankruptcy”. For potential investors, a scenario assessment model has been developed, which makes it possible to determine the benefits, opportunity costs, the feasibility of merger or acquisition of a distressed company, the cost of its restoration and integration, and the synergetic effect of such M&A.

Keywords: financial analysis, business sustainability, signs (indicators, triggers) of crisis, insolvency (bankruptcy), insolvency practitioner, debtor, creditor, investor, mergers and acquisitions with distressed companies, strategic map, financial ratios.

JEL: D25, G21, G33, G34, H12, M42

EDN: KTQLRS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_4_89_111

References

  1. Anshin V.M. System approach in the management of transformational programs in the company // Scientific research and development. Russian Journal of Project Management. 2016. Vol. 5. No. 2. Рp. 3–20. (In Russ.).
  2. Arinichev I.V., Matveeva L.G., Arinicheva I.V. Forecasting the bankruptcy of an organization based on metric methods of data mining // Journal of Economic Regulation (Issues of economic regulation). 2018. Vol. 9. No. 1. Рp. 61–73. (In Russ.).
  3. Bobyleva A.Z. Draft Federal Standard for conducting an analysis of the debtor’s financial condition by an arbitration manager // Strategic decisions and risk management. 2016. No. 2 (95). Pp. 43–47. (In Russ.).
  4. Bobyleva A.Z., Lvova O.A. Management of transformational programs of mergers and acquisitions with the participation of problem companies // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Management. 2019. Vol. 18. No. 4. Рp. 483–509. (In Russ.).
  5. Bobyleva A.Z., Lvova O.A. Financial and economic tools for identifying signs of objective bankruptcy // Actual problems of economics and law. 2020. No. 1. Рp. 22–39. (In Russ.).
  6. Grishina S.A., Gorbunova O.A. SPACE analysis as a method of evaluating the current strategy in the organization // Bulletin of Modern Research. 2018. No. 9.4. Рp. 76–79. (In Russ.).
  7. Ivashkovskaya I.V., Konstantinov G.N., Filonovich S.R. The formation of a corporation in the context of the life cycle of an organization // Russian Journal of Management. 2004. 2. No. 4. Рр. 19–34. (In Russ.).
  8. Kazakov A.V., Kolyshkin A.V. Development of bankruptcy forecasting models in modern Russian conditions // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Economy. 2018. No. 2. Рp. 241–266. (In Russ.).
  9. Ivlev V., Popova T. Balanced scorecard (BSC) // Management today. 2001. No. 4. 24–33. (In Russ.).
  10. Karelina S.A. Signs of objective bankruptcy used in determining the grounds for bringing to subsidiary liability for the inability to fully repay creditors’ claims due to the actions and (or) inaction of the controlling debtor person // Economy and Law. 2020. No. 3. Рp. 32–47. (In Russ.).
  11. Lvova O.A. Possibilities and limitations of using models of bankruptcy diagnostics to prevent insolvency // Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 6: Economics. 2021. 4. Рp. 73–94. (In Russ.).
  12. Lvova O.A. The role of financial investigation tools in bankruptcy procedures of companies // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2018. No. 2. Рp. 125–140. (In Russ.).
  13. Marakulina I.V., Anfertieva N.I. Application of strategic analysis methods in substantiating the competitive strategy of an organization // Concept. 2013. No. 8 (24). 26–30. (In Russ.).
  14. Pokrovskaya N.V., Lvova N.A. Financial analysis of insolvent enterprises: the role of accounting and tax reporting // International accounting. 2015. No. 14. Рp. 30–40. (In Russ.).
  15. Rudakova O.Yu., Rudakova T.A. Completeness and reliability of the debtor’s financial analysis in bankruptcy procedures // Strategic Decisions and Risk Management. 2013. 1. Рр. 76–83. (In Russ.).
  16. Anshin V., Bobyleva A. The digital transformation program management in mediumsized businesses: a network approach // Serbian Journal of Management. 2021. Vol. 16. 1. Рр. 147–159.
  17. Bellovary J.L., Giacomino D.E., Akers M.D. A review of bankruptcy prediction studies: 1930 to present // Journal of Financial education. 2007. Рр. 1–42.
  18. Borgonovo E., Plischke E. Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances // European Journal of Operational Research. 2016. Vol. 248. No. 3. Pp. 869–887.
  19. Grundy T. Rethinking and reinventing Michael Porter’s five forces model // Strategic change. 2006. Vol. 15. No. 5. Pp. 213–229.
  20. Guidelines “Prudential treatment of problem assets – definitions of non-performing exposures and forbearance” of Basel Committee on Banking Supervision // Bank for International Settlements. 2016. P. 10. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d403.pdf (accessed: 28.06.2023).
  21. Kosow H., Gaßner R. Methods of future and scenario analysis: overview, assessment, and selection criteria. DEU. 2008. Vol. 39. Pp. 39–134.
  22. Postma T.J.B.M., Liebl F. How to improve scenario analysis as a strategic management tool? // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2005. Vol. 72. No. 2. Pp. 161–173.
  23. Rudnicki W., Vagner I. Methods of strategic analysis and proposal method of measuring productivity of a company // Zeszyty Naukowe Małopolskiej Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej w Tarnowie. 2014. No. 2 (25). Pp. 175–184.
  24. Wu Y., Gaunt C., Gray S. A comparison of alternative bankruptcy prediction models // Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics. 2010. Vol. 6. No. 1. Pp. 34–45.

Manuscript submission date: 29.06.2023  

For citation:

Lvova O.A. Business evaluation within crisis management: approaches for owners, creditors, insolvency practitioners and investors // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2023. № 4. Pp. 89-111. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_4_89_111 EDN: KTQLRS

  Creative Commons 4.0

© Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2021 - 2024

32, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, Moscow, Russia 117218, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Phone.: +7 (499) 724-13-91, E-mail: vestnik-ieran@inbox.ru