The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 2/2023. Issues of Economic theory.

Oleg Yu. Boldyrev

Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor at the Department of Political Economy of the Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University;

Assistant at the Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law of the Faculty of Law of Lomonosov Moscow State University;

Leading Researcher at the Institute for Economic Policy and Economic Security Problems of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

ON THE ISSUE OF CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY IN THE FRAMEWORK OF "INSTITUTIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY"

Размер файла73-85 Размер файла  351.02 KB  Open .pdf

Abstract

The article presents a brief summary of the development of political economy. The fundamental differences between the methodology of political economy and the methodology of economics are briefly described. It is shown that modern political economy is not reduced to either Marxism or the "new political economy" of J. Buchanan. The relevance of research within the framework of institutional political economy, which is capable of developing the achievements of classical political economy, traditional institutionalism and institutional evolutionary theory, is substantiated. It is proposed to develop constitutional political economy within the framework of this particular area of political and economic research.

Keywords: constitutional political economy, constitutional economics, political economy, institutional political economy, traditional institutionalism, methodology of economic science.

JEL: А12, А13, В1, В2, В4, В52, К00.

EDN: QCYHNA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_2_73_85

References

  1. Alle M. Economics as a science. M., 1995. (In Russ).
  2. Arrighi J. Adam Smith in Beijing. What did the 21st century inherit. M.: Institute of public design. 2009. (In Russ).
  3. Barenboim P.D. Russian school of constitutional economics (constitutional political economics, constitutional legal economics). Phantoms, myths and terms of constitutional economic theory // Yearbook of Constitutional Economics. 2018 / Managing editors S.A. Avakyan, P.D. Barenboim, V.V. Komarov. Compiled by P.D. Barenboim. M.: LUM. 2018. Рр. 7–18. (In Russ).
  4. Boldyrev O.Yu. The Political Economic Analysis of Law and Constitutional Political Economy as an Alternative to “Economic Imperialism” // Issues of Political Economy. 2023. No. 1. Рр. 94–108. (In Russ).
  5. Boldyrev O.Yu. Constitutional reform-2020 and the economic development of Russia // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2020. No. 5. Pр. 94–107. (In Russ).
  6. Boldyrev O.Yu. Economic sovereignty of the state and the constitutional and legal mechanisms of its protection: monograph / scientific. ed. A. Avakyan. Moscow: Prospect. 2018. (In Russ).
  7. Boyer R., Brousseau E., Kaye A., Favreau O. Toward the establishment of institutional political economy // Economic sociology. 2008. T. 9. No. 3. Рр. 17–25. (In Russ).
  8. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I., Moskovsky A.I. Marxism and institutionalism: a comparative study // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 6: Economics, 2012. No. 5. Рp. 3–18. (In Russ).
  9. Weiskopf T.E. Reflections on the fifty-year history of radical political economy // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Economy. 2015. Ser. 5. Issue. 1. Р. 69–84. (In Russ).
  10. Walras L. Elements of pure political economy. M.: Izograph. 2000. (In Russ).
  11. Voeikov M.I. Political economy in the Russian tradition: from Pososhkov to Abalkin / IV Russian Economic Congress “REK-2020”. Volume I. Thematic Conference “Political Economy” (collection of materials) / Compiled by D. A. Veselov, G. D. Gloveli, A. M. Libman. M. 2020. Р. 27–29. (In Russ).
  12. Gloveli G.D. Geopolitical Economy in Russia from Discussions of Identity to Global Models (19th century – first third of the 20th century). SPb.: Aletheia. 2009. (In Russ).
  13. Desai R. Geopolitical Economy: After American Hegemony, Globalization and Empire: Monograph / Radika Desai; scientific ed. Russian edition of S.D. Bodrunov. M.: INIR im. S.Yu. Witte: Center catalogue, 2020. (In Russ).
  14. Dzarasov S.S. Where is Keynes calling Russia? M.: Algorithm. 2012. (In Russ).
  15. Efimov V.M. Economics in question: different methodology, history and research practices. Monograph. M.: COURSE: INFRA-M. 2016. (In Russ).
  16. Zhid Sh. The emergence and development of social economy in the XIX century. / Problems of the economy: From the history of social economy to the question of small-scale agriculture. Lectures by professors of the Russian Higher School of Social Sciences in Paris. Ed. Stereotype. M.: LENAND. 2022. (In Russ).
  17. Kirdina-Chandler S.G. Radical institutionalism and fake economy in the 21st century // Journal of Institutional Studies, 2017. Vol. 9. No. 4. Pр. 6–16. (In Russ).
  18. Maevsky V.I. On the evolutionary-synergetic paradigm in economics / Essays on economic synergetics / Ed. IN AND. Mayevsky, S.G. KirdinaChandler, M.A. Deryabina. M.: IE RAN, 2017. Рp. 9–17. (In Russ).
  19. Mairowski F. Physics and “marginalist revolution” // TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2012. Vol. 10. No. 1. Pр. 100–116. (In Russ).
  20. Mill J.S. Fundamentals of political economy and some aspects of their application to social philosophy. M.: Progress Publishing House. 1980. Vol. 1. (In Russ).
  21. Moskovsky A.I. Institutionalism: theory, decision-making basis, method of criticism // Questions of Economics. 2009. No. 3. Рp. 110–124. (In Russ).
  22. Myrdal G. Modern problems of the “third world”. M.: Progress Publishing House. 1972. (In Russ).
  23. Nureev R.M. Political Economy: Old and New // Journal of Institutional Studies. 2011. Vol. 3. No. 3. Pр. 4–10. (In Russ).
  24. Oleinikov A.A. Political economy of the national economy. / Rev. ed. O.A. Platonov. M.: Institute of Russian 2010. (In Russ).
  25. Ryazanov V.T. Russian school of economic thought: universal-general and nationalspecial // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. 2010. Ser. 5. № 4. Р. 66–84. (In Russ).
  26. Sismondi S. New principles of political economy or wealth in relation to population. M.: State socio-economic publishing house. 1937. (In Russ).
  27. Smith A. Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of nations [per. from English. P. Klyukina]. M.: Eksmo. 2016. (In Russ).
  28. Sorokin D.E. Russian political and economic thought: main features and traditions // Questions of Economics, 2001. No. 2. Pр. 18–27. (In Russ).
  29. Whitehead A. Selected Works in Philosophy. M., 1990. (In Russ).
  30. Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov V.A. The evolution of economic theory: from A. Smith to neo-Smithism // World of Changes. 2010. № 4. Рp. 9– 25. (In Russ).
  31. Khudokormov A.G. Amartya Sen is a representative of the left-wing reformist direction of modern institutional theory (on the work of an Indian economist – Nobel Prize winner in economics) // Russian Economic Journal. 2008. No. 5–6. Рp. 45–69. (In Russ).
  32. Chernavsky D.S. On the mathematical apparatus of evolutionary economics / Evolution of economic theory: reproduction, technology, institutions. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Evolutionary Economics and Methodological Seminar on Institutional and Evolutionary Economics. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2015. Рр. 294–300. (In Russ).
  33. Schumpeter J. Ten great economists from Marx to Keynes [Text] / transl. from English. N. V. Avtonomova, I. M. Osadchey, N. A. Rozinskaya; under scientific ed. V.S. Avtonomov. M.: Ed. Gaidar Institute. 2011. (In Russ).
  34. Ha-Joon Chang Breaking the Mould: An Institutionalist Political Economy Alternative to Neo-Liberal Theory of the Market and the State // Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2002, February. Pp. 539–559.
  35. Luttwak E. From Geopolitics to Geo economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce. The National Interest. 1990.№20. Рp. 17–24.

Manuscript submission date: 01.03.2023

For citation:

Boldyrev O.Yu.  On the issue of constitutional political economy in the framework of «Institutional political economy» // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2023. № 2. Pp. 73-85. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_2_73_85 EDN: QCYHNA

  Creative Commons 4.0

© Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2021 - 2024

32, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, Moscow, Russia 117218, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Phone.: +7 (499) 724-13-91, E-mail: vestnik-ieran@inbox.ru