2. Home
  3. Latest issue
  4. Articles
  5. ISSUES OF ECONOMIC THEORY

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 5/2024. Issues of Economic theory.

Yuri G. Pavlenko

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Chief Researcher, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-7358-9923

 

EGALITARIANISM IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN CREATIVE ECONOMY

Размер файла7-20 Размер файла  306.14 KB Размер файла Full text

Abstract

The article is devoted to understanding the objective grounds for the need to reduce social inequality, which creates threats to economic development, sustainability of social and political systems. The solution to the problem of social inequality is considered within the framework of the concept of egalitarianism. The author comes to the conclusion that the implementation of the principles of egalitarianism is an objective necessity, which is formed by the nature of modern social reproduction based on the creative economy. At the center of the creative economy is a person and his creative potential. At the same time, the most important political and economic basis of the creative economy is its diversity.

Keywords: egalitarianism, inequality, creative economy, labor.

JEL: A13, D60, J01, O15

EDN: AJDLIT

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_5_7_20

References

  1. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. Capitalism, post-capitalism and creative revolution (critical reflections on the article by D.A. Davydov) // Sociological research. 2022. No. 9. 100–109. (In Russ.).
  2. Buzgalin A.V. Late capitalism and its limits: dialectics of productive forces and industrial relations (to the 200th anniversary of the birth of Karl Marx) // Questions of Political Economy. 2018. № 2. Pp. 10–38. (In Russ.).
  3. Gorodetsky A.E. The role of the state in the development of the humanitarian sector in the economy // Decommercialization of the economy (socio-economic prerequisites for the progress of human potential and technological modernization). Edited by A.V. Buzgalin and N.G. Yakovleva. St. Petersburg: Polytechnic Service, 2023. Pp. 143–175. (In Russ.).
  4. Kislitsyna O.A. Ideas about inequality and attitude to the policy of income redistribution in Russia // Issues of theoretical economics. 2024. No. 3. Pp. 50–59. (In Russ.).
  5. K. What kind of planning is necessary for Russia // Questions of political science. 2022. № 1 (29). Pp. 135–145. (In Russ.).
  6. Momjian K.H. The problem of post-capitalism in the light of the formational typology of history // Questions of political economy. 2024. No. 2 (38). Pp. 90–100. (In Russ.).
  7. The New Philosophical Encyclopedia: In 4 volumes. Ed. council: V.S. Stepin and others. Vol. 4. M.: Thought, 2010. (In Russ.).
  8. Pavlenko Yu.G. The social state. In search of mechanisms of recovery // Questions of theoretical economics. 2021. No. 2. Pp. 35–44. (In Russ.).
  9. Pavlenko Yu.G. Economics and the state in the context of the formation of the post-Soviet way of life // Labor and quality of life of the Russian population (to the 100th anniversary of the birth of E.I. Kapustin): Collection / Ed. by I.V. Sobolev. M.: IE RAS, 2021. Pp. 75–86. (In Russ.).
  10. Pavlenko Yu.G. Economic problems of scientific and technological progress in research at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2020. No. 2. 43–59. (In Russ.).
  11. Panorama of economic thoughts of the end of the XX century: in 2 volumes / Ed. D. Greenway, M. Blini, I. Stewart. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg: Economic School, 2002. (In Russ.).
  12. Sablin K.S., Valieva O.V. Creative industries in modern economics: definition, approaches to measurement // Questions of theoretical economics. 2024. No. 3. 31–49. (In Russ.).
  13. Dictionary of the Russian language: In 4 volumes / Edited by A. P. Evgenieva. In-t linguistic. Research. Vol. 2. M.: Russian language; Polygraph resources, 1999. (In Russ.).
  14. Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian language. Vol. 1–4 / Edited by D. N. Ushakov M. State Institute «Soviet Encyclopedia», 1935–1940. http://feb-web.ru/feb/ushakov/ush-abc/14/us251011. htm? cmd=0&istext=1 (In Russ.).
  15. Florida R. Creative class: people who change the future. M.: Publishing house “Classic-XXI”, 2007. (In Russ.).
  16. Freeman A. Twilight of the machine-democratic approach: irreplaceable work and future production // Questions of political economy. 2016. No. 4. Pp. 37–60. (In Russ.).
  17. Khubiev K.A. Trends and prospects of modern economic development: an integrative trend? // Galbraith: the Return / Monograph / Ed. S.D. Bodrunova, M.: Cultural Revolution, 2017. Pp. 114–156. (In Russ.).
  18. Khudokormov A.G. Closer to life, comrades! (An open letter on the work “Global Capital” by A.V. Buzgalin and A.I. Kolganov. M.: URSS, 2015) // Questions of political economy. 2016. No. 10. Р 144–149. (In Russ.).
  19. Chen Enfu. The world situation and the Chinese economy in a new era: A monograph. M.: INIR named after S.Y. Witte: Center Catalog, 2023. (In Russ.).
  20. The economic theory of the state: a new paradigm of paternalism / edited by A.Ya. Rubinstein, A.E. Gorodetsky, R.S. Grinberg. St. Petersburg: Aleteya, 2020. (In Russ.).
  21. Yakovleva N.G. Human potential in the light of the theory of noonomics: on the transformation of an “economic man” into a “cultural man” // Economic revival of Russia. 2023. No. 4. Pp. 49–58. (In Russ.).
  22. Bakhshi H. How big are the UK's creative industries? Part 3. 14/01/2024. https://www.nesta.org. uk/blog/how-big-are-the-uks-creative-industries-part-3 (date of application: 04.09.2024).

Manuscript submission date: 16.09.2024

 

For citation:

Pavlenko Yu.G. Egalitarianism in the context of modern creative economy // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 5. Pp. 7-20. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_5_7_20 EDN: AJDLIT

  Creative Commons 4.0

 

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 4/2024. Issues of Economic theory.

Ivan A. Titov

Postgraduate Student, Research Assistant of Financial Management Department of the School of Public Administration Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0009-0009-6562-5048

 

THE THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ECOSYSTEM CONCEPT IN ECONOMY

Размер файла26-46 Размер файла  642.05 KB Размер файла Full text

Abstract

Over the past decade ecosystems have become an important part of the economy, ensuring innovative business growth and progressive socio-economic development of Russia. However, to clearly understand the essence of the ecosystem in the economy, it is necessary to systematize the existing theoretical positions. The article identifies the main theoretical approaches to the development of the ecosystem concept in the economy. Based on their analysis and generalization, the evolution of the ecosystem concept from the field of ecology to economy is shown, approaches to understanding the ecosystem as a business environment and as a business model are revealed and the main features of the metaphorical use of the term “ecosystem” are determined. In addition, derived meso- and macroeconomic categories of the ecosystem are identified, emphasizing the systemic nature of socioeconomic development.

Keywords: ecosystem concept, ecological system (ecosystem), business ecosystem, digital ecosystem, regional ecosystem, national ecosystem, ecosystem of the economy.

JEL: A12, O43

EDN: LOYIWB

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_4_26_46

References

  1. Ramenskaya L.A. The concept of ecosystem in economic and management studies // Upravlenets (The Manager). 2020. Vol. 11. No. 4. Pp. 16–28. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-2. EDN: BQQBJU. (In Russ.).
  2. Audretsch D.B., Cunningham J.A., Kuratko D.F., Lehmann E.E., Menter M. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Economic, technological, and societal impacts // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2019. Vol. 44. Pp. 313–325. DOI: 10.1007/s10961- 018-9690-4.
  3. Makeykina S.M., Rodina E.E., Artemov A.V., Gorchakova E.R.Development of business ecosystems of domestic companies in the digital environment in the context of ensuring a synergetic effect // HERALD of the Moscow university of finances and law MFUA. 2021. No. 4. Pp. 141–152. DOI: 10.52210/2224669X_2021_4_141. EDN: SCLTKZ. (In Russ.).
  4. Markova V.D., Kuznetsova S.A. Strategic management in ecosystems: Analysis of the Russian experience // Strategic Decisions and Risk Management. 2021. Vol. 12. No. 3. 242–251. DOI: 10.17747/2618-947X-2021-3-242-251. EDN: VAWMTR. (In Russ.).
  5. Haeckel E. General morphology of organisms: general principles of the science of organic form, mechanically based on the theory of descent as reformed by Charles Darwin. Berlin: Verlag von Georg Reimer, 1866. (In Germ.).
  6. Nikol’skii A.A., Stepanov D.A. Ernst Haeckel – the founder of the science of ecology // RUDN Journal of Ecology and Life Safety. 2011. No. 1. Pp. 5–11. EDN: NCDSNF. (In Russ.).
  7. Danilov-Danilyan V.I. Ecosystem is one of the most important fundamental conception of modern science // Ecosystems: Ecology and Dynamics. 2017 Vol. 1. No. 1. Pp. 5–9. EDN: YYVQFJ. (In Russ.).
  8. Forbes S.A. The Lake as a Microcosm // Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin. 1925. Vol. 15. No. 9. Pp. 537–550. DOI: 10.21900/j.inhs.v15.303.
  9. Tansley A.G. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms // Ecology. 1935. Vol. 16. No. 3. Pp. 284–307. DOI: 10.1177/0309133307083297.
  10. Odum E.P. Fundamentals of ecology. Moscow: Mir Publischers, 1975. (In Russ.).
  11. Owen D.F. What is Ecology. London: Oxford University Press, 1974.
  12. Sadovsky V.N. Yudin E.G. General Theory of Systems Research. Collection of Translations. Moscow: Progress Publischers, 1969. (In Russ.).
  13. Sadovsky V.N. Foundations of the General Systems Theory. A Logical and Methodological Analysis. Moscow: Nauka, 1974. (In Russ.).
  14. Hannan M.T., Freeman J.H. The Population Ecology of Organizations // American Journal of Sociology. 1977. Vol. 82. No. 5. Pp. 929–964. DOI: 10.1086/226424.
  15. Moore J.F. Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition // Harvard Business Review. 1993. Vol. 71. No. 3. Pp. 75–83. EDN: BOKNEH.
  16. Zub A.T. Organizational Changes in the Non-linear World // Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2017. No. 60. Pp. 71–93. EDN: YJGYVZ. (In Russ.).
  17. Ansoff I. The New Corporate Strategy. Saint Petersburg.: Piter Publishing House, 1999. (In Russ.).
  18. Porter M. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Moscow: Alpina Business Books, 2005. (In Russ.).
  19. Mescon M., Albert M., Khedouri F. Fundamentals of management. Moscow: Williams Publishing House, 2006. (In Russ.).
  20. Iansiti M., Levien R. Strategy as Ecology // Harvard Business Review. 2004. Vol. 82. 3. Pp. 68–78. EDN: GQUGKL.
  21. Teece D.J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance // Strategic Management Journal. 2007. Vol. 28. 13. Pp. 1319–1350.
  22. Popov E.V. Differentiation of stakeholders’ impact on ecosystem institutions // Journal of Institutional Studies. 2021. Vol. 13. No. 4. Pp. 59–70. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2021.13.4.059-070. EDN: JNUCQR. (In Russ.).
  23. Fuller J., Jacobides M.G., Reeves M. The Myths and Realities of Business Ecosystems // MIT Sloan Management Review. 2019. Vol. 60. No. 3. Pp. 1–9.
  24. Bezdudnaya A.G., Treyman M.G. Business ecosystems of companies: competition or cooperation, the development of digital approaches // Journal of St. Petersburg State University of Economics. 2021. No. 4(130). Pp. 129–134. EDN: JIBQFM. (In Russ.).
  25. Kleiner G.B. Ecosystem economy: step into the future // Economic Revival of Russia. 2019. No. 1(59). Pp. 40–45. EDN: YYIULJ. (In Russ.).
  26. Suvaryan A.M., Karapetyan A.E. Features of Network Relationships in Business Ecosystems // World of Economics and Management. 2022. Vol. 22. No. 4. Pp. 135–145. DOI 10.25205/2542-0429-2022-22-4135-145. (In Russ.).
  27. Adner R. Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy // Journal of Management. 2017. Vol. 43. No. 1. Pp. 39–58. DOI: 10.1177/0149206316678451.
  28. Kulapov M.N., Pereverzeva E.I., Kirillova O.Yu. (2022) Business ecosystems: definitions, typologies, development practices // Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 3. Pp. 1597–1612. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/vinec.12.3.115234. EDN: RLKOFE. (In Russ.).
  29. Markova V.D., Kuznetsova S.A. Ecosystems as a modern tool for business growth // ECO. 2021. No. 8(566). Pp. 151–168. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2021-8-151-168. EDN: IFBVRE. (In Russ.).
  30. Trifonov I.V., Turyanitsa I.O. The change of companies’ business strategy in the Russian Federation towards a “legal monopoly” // Innovative Development of Economy. 2021. No. 2–3(62–63). Pp. 201–209. DOI: 10.51832/2223-7984_2021_2-3_201. EDN: JYJPDS. (In Russ.).
  31. Lapidus L.V. Strategies for digital transformation of business in the context of growing turbulence in the digital environment. Fourth International Conference “Business Management in the Digital Economy”: collection of abstracts. St. Petersburg / Ed. e. n., professor Arenkov I.A. and Ph.D. n., Associate Professor M.K. Tsenzharik. St.-Petersburg: IPTs SPbGUPTD, 2021. Рр. 20–25. EDN: VBPBBL. (In Russ.).
  32. Adner R., Oxley J.E., Silverman B.S. Collaboration and Competition in Business Ecosystems (Advances in Strategic Management, Volume 30). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2013.
  33. Isenberg D.J. How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution // Harvard Business Review. 2010. Vol. 88(6). Pp. 40–50.
  34. Titov I.A., Bobyleva A.Z. Transformation of Ecosystems’ Role in the Context of Current Conditions of Digital Economy Development in Russia // Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). 2022. No. 98. Pp. 48–61. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2023-98-48-61. EDN: YJKUTV. (In Russ.).
  35. Kulikova O.M., Suvorova S.D. Ecosystem: a new format for modern business // Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge. 2021. No. 42(1). Pp. 200–205. DOI: 10.24412/2304-6139-2021-10909. EDN: TGSSEX. (In Russ.).
  36. Kulapov M.N., Pereverzeva E.I., Kirillova O.Yu. Business ecosystems: definitions, typologies, development practices // Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 3. Pp. 1597–1612. DOI: 10.18334/vinec.12.3.115234. EDN: RLKOFE. (In Russ.).
  37. Markova V.D., Trapeznikov I.S. Modern forms of partnership in business // World of Economics and Management. 2016. Vol. 16. No. 4. Pp. 109–119. (In Russ.).
  38. Ulbasheva F.D., Podolskaya T.V. Digital Transformation Projects of Companies as a Part of Crisis Management // Scientific research and development. Russian journal of project management. 2024. Vol. 1. No. 1. Pp. 50–59. DOI: 10.12737/2587-6279-2024-13-1-50-59. EDN: UIUTIH. (In Russ.).
  39. Kobylko A.A.Prospects of developing business ecosystems: competition, cooperation, specialization // Russian Journal of Economics and Law. 2022. Vol. 16. No. 4. Pp. 728–744. DOI: 10.21202/2782-2923.2022.4.728-744. EDN: CJUOSD. (In Russ.).
  40. Nachira F., E. Chiozza, H. Ihonen et al.Towards a network of digital business ecosystems fostering the local development. Brussels: European Commission, 2002.
  41. Briscoe G., Sadedin S., De Wilde P. Digital ecosystems: Ecosystem-oriented architectures // Natural Computing. 2011. Vol. 10. Iss. 3. Pp. 1143–1194. DOI: 10.1007/s11047-011-9254-0.
  42. Schroeck, M., Kwan, A., Kawamura, J. Ecosystem-driven portfolio strategy // Deloitte Insights, 2020. https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/our-thinking/insights/topics/digital-transformation/industry-4-0/business-ecosystem-strategy.html
  43. Panshin B. Digital economy: concepts and directions of development // Science and Innovations. 2019. No. 3(193). Pp. 48–55. EDN: NDRYZB. (In Russ.).
  44. Solodilova N.Z., Grishin K.E., Malikov R.I.Configuration Approach to Researching Regional Entrepreneurial Ecosystems // Economic Policy. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 5. 134–155. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2018-5-134-15. EDN: YMCETR. (In Russ.).
  45. Bushueva M.A., Masyuk N.N., Bragina Z.V. et al.The role of business ecosystems in forming the ecosystem of the regional economy // Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2022. № 12(2). Pp. 203–209. DOI: 10.17513/vaael.2639. EDN: PHSGUQ. (In Russ.).
  46. Ivanova D.E., Dryaev M.R., Yalov A.M. Formation of the national ecosystem and regional economy as the basis for successful functioning of the economy of the XXI century // Regional Problems of Transforming the Economy. 2020. No. 8. Pp. 154–160. DOI: 10.26726/1812-7096-2020-8-154-160. (In Russ.).
  47. Freeman Ch. Technology, Policy, and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers, 1987.
  48. Etzkowitz H. The Triple Helix. University–Industry–Government Innovation in Action. New York: Routledge, 2008.
  49. Protopopova N.I. Nature, role and evolution of social institutions (by T. Veblen, D. North) // Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2008. No. 12(68). 379–387. EDN: KNPAAL. (In Russ.).
  50. Maiminas E.Z.Socioeconomic Genotype of a Society (1989) // Moscow University Economic Bulletin. 2016. No. 4. Pp. 186–204. EDN: XHOHTT. (In Russ.).
  51. Veblen T.The theory of the leisure class. Moscow.: Moscow: Progress Publischers, 1984. (In Russ.).
  52. Polekhin D.A., Jumaev E., Tsybulya D.A. et al. The Connection Between the Process of Digitalization and Projectification of Society // Scientific research and development. Russian journal of project management. 2022. Vol. 11. No. 3. Pp. 15–21. DOI: 10.12737/2587-6279-2022-11-3-15-21. EDN: ZNHVXI. (In Russ.).
  53. Titov I.A. Digital Platforms as an Impetus for the Realization Companies’ IT-Infrastructure Import Substitution Projects: Sber Ecosystem Experience // Scientific research and development. Russian journal of project management. 2024. Vol. 1. No. 1. Pp. 43–49. DOI: 10.12737/2587-6279-2024-13-1-43-49. EDN: FBUUEB. (In Russ.).

Manuscript submission date: 22.05.2024

 

For citation:

Titov I.A. The theoretical approaches to the development of ecosystem concept in economy // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 4. Pp. 26-46. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_4_26_46 EDN: LOYIWB

  Creative Commons 4.0

 

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 6/2023. Issues of Economic theory.

Petr A. Orekhovsky

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Chief Researcher at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-2816-1298

 

SOVIET STRUCTURALISM: E. PREOBRAZHENSKY, S. STRUMILIN, N. VOZNESENSKY, YU. YAREMENKO

Размер файла109-133  Размер файла  364.37 KB Размер файла Full text

Abstract

Structuralism is a relatively young area of economic research, but it already has its own history in Russia. The first debates over the rates and proportions of the Soviet economy began back in the 1920s. The discussions between “geneticists” and “teleologists” were quite open then. Geneticists defended the traditionalist approach, relying on the exhaustion of the restoration impulse and the need to return the country to “normal”, average world growth rates and the accumulation rate of 16-18%. Teleologists relied on the “law of socialist accumulation” and the “theory of two regulators”. They were confident in the possibilities of accelerated development; even the “starting version” of the 1st Five-Year Plan provided for achieving an accumulation rate of more than 20%. And in the end, despite the monstrous mistakes the Bolshevik leadership made during collectivization, the teleologists turned out to be right. The 2nd Five-Year Plan was more successful — the planned savings rate was reduced, the production of consumer goods was increased, and it was possible to switch from cards to planned trade turnover. The idea of accelerated development and the discovery of the law of socialist accumulation belonged to E. Preobrazhensky, but its implementation, including through planned calculations, was carried out by S. Strumilin, and starting from the 3rd Five-Year Plan — by N. Voznesensky.

The end of the post-war period and the death of I. Stalin marked the end of “adaptive modernization”. The 8th Five-Year Plan, which aimed for faster growth of Group B industries over Group A, failed to be fulfilled. By the end of the 1970s the Soviet economy fell into inevitable stagnation. Economists of that time gave alarmist forecasts about the decline in growth rates, and proposed measures to overcome the crisis, but all of those were palliative in nature. The structuralist theory of multi-level economy by Yu. Yaremenko appeared at the same time. This theory contained a number of provisions that could be called heretical, contradicting both Marxism and the neoclassical mainstream. Despite its fruitfulness, it was ignored by both planners and Soviet leaders.

Keywords: structuralism, NEP, geneticists, damping curve, teleologists, structural crisis, multilevel economy.

JEL: B14, B15, B31, B59, N14

EDN: LFGKKN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_6_109_133

References

  1. Bethell T. Property and Prosperity. M.: IRISEN, 2008. (In Russ.).
  2. Van der Wee G. History of the World Economy. 1945–1990. M.: Nauka, 1994. (In Russ.).
  3. Voznesensky N.A. Academician N.A. Voznesensky. Essays. 1931–1947. M.: Nauka, 2018. (In Russ.).
  4. Voznesensky N.A. Marxism and Counter-Revolutionary Idealism of Rubin. About I. Rubin’s Article in the Fifth Book of the “Marx and Engels Archive” // Voznesensky N.A. Academician N.A. Voznesensky. Essays. 1931–1947. M.: Nauka, 2018. Pp. 21–30. (In Russ.).
  5. Galushka A., Niyazmetov A., Okulov M. Crystal of Growth Towards the Russian Economic Miracle. M.: Nashe zavtra, 2021. (In Russ.).
  6. Glazyev S.Yu. Theory of Long-Term Technical and Economic Development. M.: VlaDar, 1993. (In Russ.).
  7. Groman V.G. On Some Patterns Empirically Detected in Our National Economy // Planning Economy. 1925. No. 1. Pp. 88–101. (In Russ.).
  8. Groman V.G. On Some Patterns Empirically Detected in Our National Economy // Planning economy. 1925. No. 2. Pp. 125–141. (In Russ.).
  9. Kornai J. Deficit. M.: Nauka, 1990. (In Russ.).
  10. Kotkin S. Armageddon averted. The Collapse of the Soviet Union, 1970 – 2000. M.: New Literary Review, 2018. (In Russ.).
  11. Kritsman L. The Heroic Period of the Great Russian Revolution (Experience in Analyzing the So-Called “Military Communism”). M.–L.: State publishing house, 1925. (In Russ.).
  12. Orekhovsky P.A. Left Utopia in the 21st Century // Social sciences and modernity. 2020. No. 2. Pp. 162–175. DOI: 10.31857/S086904990009214-7. (In Russ.).
  13. Preobrazhensky E.A. New Economics (Theory and Practice): 1922–1928 M.: Publishing House of the Main Archive of Moscow, 2008. (In Russ.).
  14. Sapov G. Three interviews with E.B. Ershov (February–March 1999). http://www.sapov.ru/staroe/si06.html (date of access: 04.11.2023). (In Russ.).
  15. Sokolov A.S. Between Cards and Trade Turnover: The Second Soviet Five-Year Plan // Issues of theoretical economics. 2021. No. 2. Рp. 102–110. DOI: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2021_2_102_110. (In Russ.).
  16. Strumilin S.G. Problems of Planning in the USSR. L.: Academy of Sciences USSR, 1932. (In Russ.).
  17. Khlevnyuk O. Corporation of Impostors. Shadow Economy and Corruption in the Stalinist USSR. M.: New Literary Review, 2023. (In Russ.).
  18. Shiller R. Irrational Optimism: How Reckless Behavior Drives Markets. M.: Alpina Publisher, 2013. (In Russ.).
  19. Erlich A. Discussions about Industrialization in the USSR. 1924–1928. M.: Delo, 2010. (In Russ.).
  20. Yaremenko Yu.V. Theory and Methodology for Researching Multi-Level Economics. M., Nauka, 1997. (In Russ.).
  21. Yaremenko Yu.V. Economic Conversations. Recorded by S.A. Belanovsky. M.: Center for Research and Statistics of Science, 1999. (In Russ.).
  22. Lewis W.A. The Theory of Economic Growth. N.Y.: Routledge, 1959.

Manuscript submission date: 01.11.2023

For citation:

Orekhovsky P.A. Soviet Structuralism: E. Preobrazhensky, S. Strumilin, N. Voznesensky, Yu. Yaremenko // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2023. № 6. Pp. 109-133. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_6_109_133 EDN: LFGKKN

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 4/2024. Issues of Economic theory.

Yuriy V. Belousov

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Head of the Center for Budget Openness Monitoring, Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-6901-1985

 

Olga I. Timofeeva

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher of the Center for Budget Openness Monitoring, Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Associate Professor of the Department of Public Finance, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-9255-4753

 

BUDGET OPENNESS IN MODERN CONCEPTS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Размер файла7-25 Размер файла  355.45 KB Размер файла Full text

Abstract

Budget openness is a new phenomenon in public administration and in the socio-economic life of society, which appeared due to the development of information technologies. Monitoring of openness shows significant inequality in the level of budget transparency in different countries. The article examines the role and place of budget openness in modern concepts of public administration, such as the concept of M. Weber (Weberian), New Public Management and Good Governance. The work reveals the features of the implementation of budget openness mechanisms in the considered concepts of public administration and their causes. Also, proposals are formulated to increase the openness of the budgets so that it can work to improve the efficiency of public finance management. Promising areas of research include the development of mechanisms to improve the economic efficiency of public finance management through open budgets.

Keywords: open (transparent) budget, public finances, citizen participation in the management of public finances, Weberian concept, new public management, good governance, new public governance, efficiency of public finance management.

JEL: H61, G18

EDN: CQDMOV

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_4_7_25

References

  1. Hood C. Accountability and Transparency: Siamese Twins, Matching Parts, Awkward Couple? // West European Politics. 2010. Vol. 33. No. 5. P. 989–1009. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2010.486122.
  2. Montes G. C., Luna P. H. Fiscal transparency, legal system and perception of the control on corruption: empirical evidence from panel data // Empirical Economics. 2021. Vol. 60. No. 4. Pp. 2005–2037. DOI: 10.1007/s00181-020-01849-9.
  3. Bastida F., Benito B. Central government budget practices and transparency: An international comparison // Public Administration. 2007.Vol. 85. No. 3. Pp. 667–716. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00664.x.
  4. Cuadrado-Ballesteros B., Bisogno M. Budget transparency and financial sustainability // Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management. 2022. Vol. 34. No. 6. 210–234. DOI: 10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2022-0025.
  5. Wallis J., Gregory R. Leadership, Accountability and Public Value: Resolving a Problem in “New Governance”? // International Journal of Public Administration. 2009. Vol. 32. 3–4. Pp. 250–273. DOI: 10.1080/01900690902732608.
  6. Rhodes R.A.W. Network Governance and the Differentiated Polity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
  7. Denhardt R.B., Denhardt J.V. The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering. // Public Administration Review. 2000. Vol. 60. No. 6. Pp. 549–559. DOI: 10.1111/0033-3352.00117.
  8. Jessop B. Capitalism and Its Future: Remarks on Regulation, Government and Governance // Review of International Political Economy. 1997. Vol. 4. No. 3. 561–581. DOI: 10.1080/096922997347751.
  9. Weber M. Economy and Society. Essays on understanding sociology. In 4 vol. Vol. 1. M: HSE Publishing House, 2021. (In Russ.).
  10. Belousov Y., Timofeeva O. Methodological Aspects of Compiling Open Budget Rankings // Financial Journal. 2021. Vol. 13. No. 4. Pp. 122–138. DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2021-4-122-138.
  11. Pollitt C. (Author), Bouckaert G. (Contributor). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – Into the Age of Austerity. 4th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
  12. Hood C. A. Public Management for all Seasons? //Public Administration. 1991. Vol. 69. No. 1. Pp. 3–19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
  13. Pollitt C. Justification by Works or by Faith?: Evaluating the New Public Management. Evaluation. 1995. No. 1(2). Pp. 133–154. DOI: 10.1177/135638909500100202.
  14. Osborne D., Gaebler T. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Penguin, 1993.
  15. Lapuente V., Van de Walle S. The effects of new public management on the quality of public services. Governance. 2020. Vol. 33. No. 3. Pp. 461–475. DOI: 10.1111/gove.12502.
  16. Obolonskij A.V. Bureaucracy in search of a new model (the evolution of the theory and practice of public administration in recent decades) // Social Sciences and Modernity. 2014. No. 3. Pp. 5–22. EDN: SHFLOJ. (In Russ.).
  17. Smorgunov L.V. Modern trends in public administration: from new public management to public policy management // Political science. 2022. No. 3. Pp. 100–121. DOI: 10.31249/poln/2022.03.05. (In Russ.).
  18. Dunleavy P., Margetts H., Bastow S., Tinkler J. New Public Management Is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2006. Vol. 16. No 3. Pp. 467–494. DOI:10.1093/jopart/mui057.
  19. Bratchenko S.A. Quality of public administration: the content of the concept // The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2020. No. 6. 80–94. DOI: 10.24411/2073-6487-2020-10071. (In Russ.).
  20. Hood C. The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998.
  21. Argynades D. Good Governance. Professionalism, Ethics and Responsibility // International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2006. No. 72 (2). Pp. 155–170. DOI: 10.1177/0020852306064607.
  22. Ponkin I.V. On the concept and notion of “Good Governance” // Public service. 2013. No. 4 (84). Pp. 39–42. EDN: RSDQPF. (In Russ.).
  23. Budget Transparency Toolkit: Practical Steps for Supporting Openness, Integrity and Accountability in Public Financial Management. Paris: OECD, 2027.
  24. The Power of Making It Simple: A Government Guide to Developing Citizens Budgets. [S.]: The International Budget Partnership, 2006.
  25. Folscher A. Budget transparency. New frontiers in transparency and accountability. London: Open Society Foundation, 2010.
  26. Jung H. Online Open Budget: The Effects of Budget Transparency on Budget Efficiency // Public Finance Review. 2022.Vol. 50. No. 1. Pp. 91–119. DOI: 10.1177/10911421221093412.
  27. Tormey S. The Contemporary Crisis of Representative Democracy // Democratic Theory. 2014. Vol. 1. No. 2. Pp. 104–112. DOI: 10.3167/dt.2014.010211.
  28. Innerarity D. Politics in the Times of Indignation. The Crisis of Representative Democracy. [S.]: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2011.
  29. De Renzio P., Lakin J. Reframing Public Finance. Promoting Justice, Democracy, and Human Rights in Government Budgets. [S.]: The International Budget Partnership, 2019.
  30. Barabashev A.G. Crisis of public administration and its impact on the main administrative paradigms of the state and bureaucracy // Issues of state and municipal administration. 2016. No. 3. Pp. 163–194. EDN: WMQQAN. (In Russ.).
  31. Krasil‘nikov D.G., Sivinceva O.V., Troickaya E.A. Modern Western management models: synthesis New Public Management and Good Government // Ars Administrandi. 2014. No. 2. Pp. 45–62. EDN: SLJNWL. (In Russ.).

Manuscript submission date: 27.06.2024

For citation:

Belousov Y.V., Timofeeva O.I. Budget openness in modern concepts of public administration // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 4. Pp. 7-25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_4_7_25 EDN: CQDMOV

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 2/2023. Issues of Economic theory.

Oleg Yu. Boldyrev

Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor at the Department of Political Economy of the Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University;

Assistant at the Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law of the Faculty of Law of Lomonosov Moscow State University;

Leading Researcher at the Institute for Economic Policy and Economic Security Problems of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

ON THE ISSUE OF CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY IN THE FRAMEWORK OF "INSTITUTIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY"

Размер файла73-85 Размер файла  351.02 KB  Open .pdf

Abstract

The article presents a brief summary of the development of political economy. The fundamental differences between the methodology of political economy and the methodology of economics are briefly described. It is shown that modern political economy is not reduced to either Marxism or the "new political economy" of J. Buchanan. The relevance of research within the framework of institutional political economy, which is capable of developing the achievements of classical political economy, traditional institutionalism and institutional evolutionary theory, is substantiated. It is proposed to develop constitutional political economy within the framework of this particular area of political and economic research.

Keywords: constitutional political economy, constitutional economics, political economy, institutional political economy, traditional institutionalism, methodology of economic science.

JEL: А12, А13, В1, В2, В4, В52, К00.

EDN: QCYHNA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_2_73_85

References

  1. Alle M. Economics as a science. M., 1995. (In Russ).
  2. Arrighi J. Adam Smith in Beijing. What did the 21st century inherit. M.: Institute of public design. 2009. (In Russ).
  3. Barenboim P.D. Russian school of constitutional economics (constitutional political economics, constitutional legal economics). Phantoms, myths and terms of constitutional economic theory // Yearbook of Constitutional Economics. 2018 / Managing editors S.A. Avakyan, P.D. Barenboim, V.V. Komarov. Compiled by P.D. Barenboim. M.: LUM. 2018. Рр. 7–18. (In Russ).
  4. Boldyrev O.Yu. The Political Economic Analysis of Law and Constitutional Political Economy as an Alternative to “Economic Imperialism” // Issues of Political Economy. 2023. No. 1. Рр. 94–108. (In Russ).
  5. Boldyrev O.Yu. Constitutional reform-2020 and the economic development of Russia // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2020. No. 5. Pр. 94–107. (In Russ).
  6. Boldyrev O.Yu. Economic sovereignty of the state and the constitutional and legal mechanisms of its protection: monograph / scientific. ed. A. Avakyan. Moscow: Prospect. 2018. (In Russ).
  7. Boyer R., Brousseau E., Kaye A., Favreau O. Toward the establishment of institutional political economy // Economic sociology. 2008. T. 9. No. 3. Рр. 17–25. (In Russ).
  8. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I., Moskovsky A.I. Marxism and institutionalism: a comparative study // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 6: Economics, 2012. No. 5. Рp. 3–18. (In Russ).
  9. Weiskopf T.E. Reflections on the fifty-year history of radical political economy // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Economy. 2015. Ser. 5. Issue. 1. Р. 69–84. (In Russ).
  10. Walras L. Elements of pure political economy. M.: Izograph. 2000. (In Russ).
  11. Voeikov M.I. Political economy in the Russian tradition: from Pososhkov to Abalkin / IV Russian Economic Congress “REK-2020”. Volume I. Thematic Conference “Political Economy” (collection of materials) / Compiled by D. A. Veselov, G. D. Gloveli, A. M. Libman. M. 2020. Р. 27–29. (In Russ).
  12. Gloveli G.D. Geopolitical Economy in Russia from Discussions of Identity to Global Models (19th century – first third of the 20th century). SPb.: Aletheia. 2009. (In Russ).
  13. Desai R. Geopolitical Economy: After American Hegemony, Globalization and Empire: Monograph / Radika Desai; scientific ed. Russian edition of S.D. Bodrunov. M.: INIR im. S.Yu. Witte: Center catalogue, 2020. (In Russ).
  14. Dzarasov S.S. Where is Keynes calling Russia? M.: Algorithm. 2012. (In Russ).
  15. Efimov V.M. Economics in question: different methodology, history and research practices. Monograph. M.: COURSE: INFRA-M. 2016. (In Russ).
  16. Zhid Sh. The emergence and development of social economy in the XIX century. / Problems of the economy: From the history of social economy to the question of small-scale agriculture. Lectures by professors of the Russian Higher School of Social Sciences in Paris. Ed. Stereotype. M.: LENAND. 2022. (In Russ).
  17. Kirdina-Chandler S.G. Radical institutionalism and fake economy in the 21st century // Journal of Institutional Studies, 2017. Vol. 9. No. 4. Pр. 6–16. (In Russ).
  18. Maevsky V.I. On the evolutionary-synergetic paradigm in economics / Essays on economic synergetics / Ed. IN AND. Mayevsky, S.G. KirdinaChandler, M.A. Deryabina. M.: IE RAN, 2017. Рp. 9–17. (In Russ).
  19. Mairowski F. Physics and “marginalist revolution” // TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2012. Vol. 10. No. 1. Pр. 100–116. (In Russ).
  20. Mill J.S. Fundamentals of political economy and some aspects of their application to social philosophy. M.: Progress Publishing House. 1980. Vol. 1. (In Russ).
  21. Moskovsky A.I. Institutionalism: theory, decision-making basis, method of criticism // Questions of Economics. 2009. No. 3. Рp. 110–124. (In Russ).
  22. Myrdal G. Modern problems of the “third world”. M.: Progress Publishing House. 1972. (In Russ).
  23. Nureev R.M. Political Economy: Old and New // Journal of Institutional Studies. 2011. Vol. 3. No. 3. Pр. 4–10. (In Russ).
  24. Oleinikov A.A. Political economy of the national economy. / Rev. ed. O.A. Platonov. M.: Institute of Russian 2010. (In Russ).
  25. Ryazanov V.T. Russian school of economic thought: universal-general and nationalspecial // Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. 2010. Ser. 5. № 4. Р. 66–84. (In Russ).
  26. Sismondi S. New principles of political economy or wealth in relation to population. M.: State socio-economic publishing house. 1937. (In Russ).
  27. Smith A. Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of nations [per. from English. P. Klyukina]. M.: Eksmo. 2016. (In Russ).
  28. Sorokin D.E. Russian political and economic thought: main features and traditions // Questions of Economics, 2001. No. 2. Pр. 18–27. (In Russ).
  29. Whitehead A. Selected Works in Philosophy. M., 1990. (In Russ).
  30. Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov V.A. The evolution of economic theory: from A. Smith to neo-Smithism // World of Changes. 2010. № 4. Рp. 9– 25. (In Russ).
  31. Khudokormov A.G. Amartya Sen is a representative of the left-wing reformist direction of modern institutional theory (on the work of an Indian economist – Nobel Prize winner in economics) // Russian Economic Journal. 2008. No. 5–6. Рp. 45–69. (In Russ).
  32. Chernavsky D.S. On the mathematical apparatus of evolutionary economics / Evolution of economic theory: reproduction, technology, institutions. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Evolutionary Economics and Methodological Seminar on Institutional and Evolutionary Economics. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2015. Рр. 294–300. (In Russ).
  33. Schumpeter J. Ten great economists from Marx to Keynes [Text] / transl. from English. N. V. Avtonomova, I. M. Osadchey, N. A. Rozinskaya; under scientific ed. V.S. Avtonomov. M.: Ed. Gaidar Institute. 2011. (In Russ).
  34. Ha-Joon Chang Breaking the Mould: An Institutionalist Political Economy Alternative to Neo-Liberal Theory of the Market and the State // Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2002, February. Pp. 539–559.
  35. Luttwak E. From Geopolitics to Geo economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce. The National Interest. 1990.№20. Рp. 17–24.

Manuscript submission date: 01.03.2023

For citation:

Boldyrev O.Yu.  On the issue of constitutional political economy in the framework of «Institutional political economy» // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2023. № 2. Pp. 73-85. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_2_73_85 EDN: QCYHNA

  Creative Commons 4.0

  1. Vinokurov S.S. BEHAVIORAL “ANOMALIES” AND THE COST OF DECISION-MAKING
  2. Maltsev A.A., Chichilimov S.V. TO THE QUESTION OF THE EVOLUTION OF THE OPPOSITION OF FREE TRADE AND PROTECTIONISM IN THE 20TH AND 21TH CENTURY

© Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2021 - 2024

32, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, Moscow, Russia 117218, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Phone.: +7 (499) 724-13-91, E-mail: vestnik-ieran@inbox.ru

  

Russian version

HOME

JOURNAL DESCRIPTION

General information

Editorial policies

Author guidelines

LATEST ISSUE

ARCHIVE

Editorial advisory board

Editorial team

Author guidelines

Submit article