The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 5/2024.  Economics and Management.

Alexandra V. Odintsova

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher of the Center for Federal Relations and Regional Development, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-3569-1000

 

PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTING LOCAL GOVERNANCE CONCEPT IN RUSSIA

Размер файла21-41 Размер файла  344.58 KB Размер файла Full text

Abstract

One of the key issues of spatial development at the present stage is to ensure the balanced development of Russian territories. The article examines current problems of municipal development in the Russian Federation taking into account the principles laid down in the concept of local governance as one of the components of the modern public authority system. The history and meaningful analysis of the concept are given, the key problems are identified, on the solution of which, in accordance with this concept, the implementation of the goals of the spatial policy of our country largely depends. Based on the use of stakeholder concepts and institutional proximity, the practice of municipal strategizing is evaluated.

Keywords: institutional proximity, local government, municipal formation, spatial development, local governance concept.

JEL: R50, O29

EDN: HPONPM

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_5_21_41

References

  1. Kooiman J. Findings, Speculations and Recommendations, dans J. Kooiman (dir). Modern Governance. London. Sage. 1993. (In Russ.).
  2. Polterovich V.M. The crisis of institutions of political competition, the Internet and collaborative democracy // Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 52–72. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-52-72. (In Russ.).
  3. Odintsovа A.V. Spatial economics in the works of representatives of the French school of regulation // Spatial Economics. 2011. No. 3. Pp. 56–70. EDN: OIMPMN. (In Russ.).
  4. Odintsovа A.V. Local self-government as an institution of development // Federalism. 2015. No. 2. Pp. 87–100. DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2015-2-87-100. (In Russ.).
  5. Yakovleva S.I. Spatial models in strategies of socio-economic development of Russian regions // Pskov Regionological Journal. 2014. No. 17. Pp. 3–16. EDN: SJEHCJ. (In Russ.).
  6. Orekhovsky P.A. «The spirit of place» and the role of the territorial self-identification of the elite in the socio-economic development of cities // South Russian Forum. 2013. No. 2 (7). Pp. 82–101. EDN: RTQHBT. (In Russ.).
  7. Discussion club on the topic: “Approaches to the assessment of municipal strategies” // Website of the Institute of Urban Economics. 29.10.2019. https://urbaneconomics.ru/centr-obshchestvennyh-svyazey/news/diskussionnyy-klub-na-temu-podhody-kocenke-municipalnyh (accessed: 05.11.2024). (In Russ.).
  8. Kosenkova M. Civil communities in municipalities want to be consolidated by law // The Рarliamentary newspaper. 28.10.2022. https://www.pnp.ru/top/grazhdanskiesoobshhestva-v-municipalitetakh-khotyat-zakrepit-zakonom.html (accessed: 08.20.2024).
  9. Hillery G.A. (Jr.) (1955). Definitions of Community: Area of Agreement // Rural Sociology. Vol. 20 (June). No. 2. Pp. 111–123.
  10. Jacobs J. Death and life of big American cities. M.: New Publishing house. 2011.
  11. Odintsovа A.V. Local community: the problem of institutionalization // Questions of theoretical economics. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 52–63. DOI: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2023_2_52_63. (In Russ.).
  12. Pecqueur B. Le tournant territorial de l’économie globale. Espaces et sociétés. 2006. No. 124–125/2–3. Рp. 5–6. http://iga.ujf-grenoble.fr/territoires/publications
  13. Torre A., 2008. On the Role Played by Temporary Geographical Proximity in Knowledge Transmission // Regional Studies. Vol. 42. No. 6. Pp. 869–889.
  14. Torre A. Jalons pour une analyse dynamique des Proximités // Revue d’économie régionale et urbaine. 2010. № 3. P. 417. https://shs.cairn.info/revue-d-economieregionale-et-urbaine-2010-3-page-409?lang=fr#s2n2
  15. Pecqueur B., Ternaux P. Mondialisation, restructuration et gouvernance territoriale // Géographie, économie, société. 2005. No. 7.
  16. Le Budget participative: le pouvoir aux parisiennes // P. Dossier de presse. 2018. 2 octobre. https://budgetparticipatif.paris.fr/bp/plugins/download/BP2018-DossierDePresse.pdf
  17. Report on the best practices in the development of initiative budgeting in the subjects of the Russian Federation and municipalities. The Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation. 2024.
  18. A New-York, le budget participative renouvelle la participation démocratique. http://lesbudgetsparticipatifs.fr/a-new-york-le-budget-participatif-renouvelle-laparticipation-democratique/

Manuscript submission date: 10.09.2024

 

For citation:

Odintsova A.V. Problems of implementing local governance concept in Russia // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 5. Pp. 21-41. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_5_21_41 EDN: HPONPM

  Creative Commons 4.0

© Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2021 - 2024

32, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, Moscow, Russia 117218, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Phone.: +7 (499) 724-13-91, E-mail: vestnik-ieran@inbox.ru