2. Home
  3. Latest issue
  4. Articles
  5. ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 6/2024.  Economics and Management.

Roman V. Gubarev

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor of the Department of Economic Theory, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-1634-5030

 

Ariz A. Gezalov

Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Leading Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia

 

Evgeniy I. Dzyuba

Research Associate, Institute of Social and Economic Research of UFRC RAS, Ufa, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-2209-2017

 

Aybulat G. Karimov

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Acting Director, Institute of Social and Economic Research of UFRC RAS, Ufa, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-4185-5377

 

Fanil S. Fayzullin

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Chief Researcher, Institute of Social and Economic Research of UFRC RAS, Ufa, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-8368-4441

 

REMUNERATION OF REGIONAL CIVIL SERVANTS IN RUSSIA: PROPOSALS TO INCREASE LABOR

Размер файла116-135  Размер файла  733.79 KB Размер файла Full text

This study is devoted to the consideration of a methodological approach to collective stimulation of the effective work of regional civil servants. Such an approach will allow the first person of any subject of the Russian Federation to increase the real interest of regional civil servants in sustainable development. Taking into account the multi-subject nature of the Russian Federation, the authors propose to consider and adapt the Singapore model to the realities of our country and establish a direct link between the salaries of civil servants of the executive authorities of the Russian regions and the effectiveness of their activities, expressed in indicators of the socio-economic development of the region. The article presents the results of cluster analysis. All subjects of the Russian Federation, based on the actual value of the index, are distributed into three clusters characterized by above average, average and below average levels of efficiency of the executive authorities. The level of incentives (bonuses) for employees depends on two factors - the direct result of regional management, expressed in the index of socio-economic development of the region, and which cluster the region falls into.

Keywords: efficiency of public administration, regional civil servants, wages, collective incentives, executive authorities, regions of Russia.

JEL: J31, J38, C7

EDN: IWDMWJ

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_6_116_135

References

  1. Balatsky E.V. The Model of Singapore Miracle: Lessons for Russia // Mir Rossii. 2021. No. 4. Pp. 188–208. DOI:10.17323/1811-038X-2021-30-4-188-208. (In Russ.).
  2. Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A. Power, market and social system complexity: theoretical model of financial and management mechanism // Finance: Theory and Practice. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 70–83. DOI:10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-1-70-83. (In Russ.).
  3. Grinberg R.S., Akhunov R.R., Volodin A.I., Gubarev R.V., Dzyuba E.I. Performance-based pay – a new (mixed) payment scheme for Russian civil servants // Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2018. No. 6. Pp. 163–183. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.6.60.10. (In Russ.).
  4. Zenkevich N.A., Katkalo V.S., Klemina T.N., Medvedev A.G. Evolution of Incentive Contracts Modeling with Companies CEOs // Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management. 2012. No. 1. Pp. 3–25. (In Russ.).
  5. Tirole J. The theory of industrial organization. St. Petersburg: Economic School, 2000. (In Russ.).
  6. Tokarev A.A., Kravchuk I.D., Boyko M.Y., Ilyinsky R.V. Sociology of the Russian image of the future: preliminary results // Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 5. Pp. 117–136. DOI: 10.17976/2022.05.09. (In Russ.).
  7. Cherednichenko L.G., Gubarev R.V., Dziuba E.I., Fayzullin F.S. Game-theoretic approach to modeling collective labor incentives for regional civil servants in Russia // Journal of Institutional Studies. 2022. No. 3. Pp. 103–118. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2022.14.3.103-118. (In Russ.).
  8. Shabunova A.A., Terebova S.V., Leonidova G.V. The Dynamics of the Modernization Development of Russian Regions: Scientific and Technological Imbalances Against the Background of General Progress // Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2023. No. 1. Pp. 53–64. DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-196-53-64. (In Russ.).
  9. Berhold M. A Theory of Linear Profit-Sharing Incentives // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1971. No. 85 (3). Pp. 460–482.
  10. Hart O. Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1995.
  11. Hart O.D., Holmstrom B.R. The Theory of Contracts. In: T. Bewley (eds.). Advances in Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. Рр. 71–155.
  12. Parsons D. The Employment Relationship: Job Attachment, Work Effort, and the Nature of Contracts. In: O. Ashenfelter, E. Lazar (eds.). Handbook of Labor Economics. North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1984.
  13. Stiglitz J. Incentives, Risk and Information: Notes towards a Theory of Hierarchy // Bell Journal of Economics. 1975. No. 6 (2). Pp. 552–579.

Manuscript submission date: 29.09.2024

 

For citation:

Gubarev R.V., Gezalov A.A., Dzyuba E.I., Karimov A.G., Fayzullin F.S. Remuneration of regional civil servants in Russia: proposals to increase labor // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 6. Pp. 116-135. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_6_116_135  EDN: IWDMWJ

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 6/2024.  Economics and Management.

Natalia N. Volkova

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

 

Evelina I. Romanyuk

Research Assistant, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

 

CONTRIBUTION OF REGIONS TO THE TECHNOLOGICAL SOVEREIGNTY OF THE COUNTRY: USING THE POSSIBILITIES OF STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Размер файла93-115 Размер файла  354.72 KB Размер файла Full text

This article is devoted to the study of regional aspects of measuring the level of technological sovereignty. The work talks about the impossibility of achieving sovereignty in a separate region. However, it is possible to conduct a comparative analysis of the contribution of regions to its achievement. The contribution of regions to the formation of technological sovereignty of Russia was assessed on the basis of the aggregated index proposed by the authors in their previous works. In this work, the authors tried to answer the question: to what extent does the system of indicators used to construct various aggregated indices of scientific and technological development reflect the real state of affairs. A comparative analysis of the clustering of regions by two sets of indicators based on data from the same year (2022) showed that the division of regions into clusters, in addition to the variables used in the cluster analysis, has hidden reasons, the identification of which will optimize the policy for managing the scientific and technological development of regions.

Keywords: rating, region, regional development, scientific and technological development, technological sovereignty, cluster analysis.

JEL: R20, R15, C38

EDN: QWLHMY

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_6_93_115

References

  1. Volkova N.N. Problems of measuring technological sovereignty // Economics and Entrepreneurship. 2024. No. 11 (172). Pр. 1364–1372. DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2024.172.11.245. EDN: BTWVCJ. (In Russ.).
  2. Raluca Csernatoni. The EU’s hegemonic imaginaries: from European strategic autonomy in defence to technological sovereignty // European Security. 2022. September. Vol. 31. 3. Pp. 395–414. DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2022.2103370. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363430860_The_EU’s_hegemonic_imaginaries
    _from_European_strategic_autonomy_in_defence_to_technological_sovereignty
  3. Afanasyev A.A. Technological sovereignty as a scientific category in the system of modern knowledge // Economy, entrepreneurship and law. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 9. 2377–2394. DOI: 10.18334/epp.12.9.116243. EDN: KEKJUR. (In Russ.).
  4. Afanasyev A.A. Technological sovereignty: options for approaches to considering the problem // Issues of innovative economics. 2023. Vol. 13. No. 2. Pp. 689–706. DOI: 10.18334/vinec. 13.2.117375. EDN: ZIAOXU. (In Russ.).
  5. Krupnov Yu.A. Features of ensuring technological sovereignty in different countries // Innovative economy: prospects for development and improvement. 2023. No. 2 (68). 114–120. EDN: GMUCLY. (In Russ.).
  6. Efimov A.V., Tikhonovskova S.A. Technological sovereignty of Russia in the context of strategic goals for the development of the regional economy // Drucker Bulletin. 2022. No. 4 (48). Pp. 165–172. DOI: 10.17213/2312-6469-2022-4-165-172/ EDN: WUGRQO. (In Russ.).
  7. Dementyev V.E. Technological sovereignty and priorities of production localization // Terra Economicus. 2023. No. 21 (1). Pp. 6–18. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-1-6-18. EDN: COKINW. (In Russ.).
  8. Lenchuk E.B., Filatov V.I. Technological sovereignty projects as an instrument of innovative development of the Russian economy // Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast. 2024. Vol. 17. No. 3. Pp. 68–81. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.3.93.4. EDN: OLPSAF. (In Russ.).
  9. Lenchuk E.B. Technological modernization as a basis for anti-sanctions policy // Problems of forecasting. 2023. No. 4 (199). Pp. 54–66. DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-199-54-66. EDN: HDROZ. (In Russ.).
  10. Faikov D.Yu., Baidarov D.Yu. Towards Technological Sovereignty: Theoretical Approaches, Practice, Proposals // Economic Revival of Russia. 2023. No. 1 (75). 67–82. DOI: 10.37930/1990-9780-2023-1-75-67-82. EDN: UDJYGK. (In Russ.).
  11. Kvint V.L., Novikova I.V., Alimuradov M.K., Sasaev N.I. Strategizing the Technological Sovereignty of the National Economy // Management Consulting. 2022. No. 9 (165). 57–67. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2022-9-57-67. EDN: RZGDLM. (In Russ.).
  12. Kovalev S.G. Technological sovereignty of Russia in the newest world order // Philosophy of Economy. 2020. No. 6. Pp. 29–46. EDN: RBJJHA. (In Russ.).
  13. Krasilnikova E.V., Nikonova A.A. How different economic agents understand the term “technological independence” of an economic object // Strategic planning and development of enterprises: Proceedings of the XXIV All-Russian Symposium, Moscow, April 11–12, 2023 / Edited by G.B. Kleiner. M.: CEMI of the RAS, 2023. Pp. 143–151. DOI: 10.34706/978-5-8211-0814-2-s1-28. EDN: MONPON. (In Russ.).
  14. Fal’tsman V.K. Technological sovereignties of Russia. Statistical measurements // Modern Europe. 2018. No. 3 (82). Pp. 83–91. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope320188391. EDN: XVYJNR. (In Russ.).
  15. Nikonova A.A. Problems of socio-economic security and technological sovereignty of Russia: a systems approach to the solution // Features and prospects of socioeconomic development of the Russian Federation under economic sanctions: Collection of articles following the results of the 2nd international scientific and practical conference, Moscow, May 24–25, 2023. Moscow: Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science Institute for Problems of Science Development of the Russian Academy of Science, 2023. Pp. 146–158. EDN: ZOVJYI. (In Russ.).
  16. Sukharev O.S. Measuring Technological Development: Approaches, Methods, Problems and Prospects // Economic Strategies. 2023. No. 1 (187). Pp. 26–35. DOI: 10.33917/es-1.187.2023.26-35. EDN: PMLLLB. (In Russ.).
  17. Chichkanov V.P., Sukharev O.S. Technological Sovereignty: A Method of Measurement // Economic Strategies. 2024. Vol. 26. No. 1 (193). Pp. 62–69. DOI: 10.33917/es-1.193.2024.62-69. EDN: QEZUGZ. (In Russ.).
  18. Akberdina V.V., Potaptseva E.V. Ensuring technological sovereignty of the state: contribution of regions // Round table “Technological sovereignty: experience of regional policy of leading regions” May 25–25, 2023. https://uiec.ru/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Акберлина-Потапцева-25.05.2023.pdf (date of access: 08.19.2024). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31420.62080. (In Russ.).
  19. Shamova E.A. Myslyakova Yu.G. Assessment of the regional potential of technological sovereignty of the Russian Federation // Economy and Management. 2023. Vol. 29. 12. Pp. 1442–1453. DOI: 10.35854/1998-1627-2023-12-1442-1453. EDN: QCKOYW. (In Russ.).
  20. Shirokova E.Yu. Scientific and technological development of regions: trends and factors of activation // Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 6: Economy. 2024. Vol. 59. No. 3. 171–190. DOI: 10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6. (In Russ.).
  21. Vinnichenko A.V., Istomina Yu.P. Determination of factors influencing the development of scientific and technological sectors in the regions of the Russian Federation // Systems analysis and logistics. 2024. No. 2 (40). Pp. 16–24. DOI: 10.31799 / 2077-5687-2024-2-16-24. EDN: UXBUYT. (In Russ.).
  22. Normova Yu.V. The influence of industrial production on the technological development of the regions of Russia // Economy, entrepreneurship and law. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 5. Pp. 1475–1492. DOI: 10.18334/epp.12.5.114632. EDN: CHSITQ. (In Russ.).
  23. Volkova N.N., Romanyuk E.I. Rating of scientific and technological development of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 50–72. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2023_2_50_72. EDN: QBNXNT. (In Russ.).
  24. Soshnikova L.A, Tamashevich V.N., Uebe G., Schaeffer M. Multivariate Statistical Analysis in Economics M.: UNITY-DANA. 1999. Pp. 468–506. EDN: EOFQGD. (In Russ.).
  25. Kremer N.Sh. Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics M.: UNITY, 2000. Pp. 375–383. (In Russ.).
  26. Dubina I.N. Mathematical and statistical methods in empirical socio-economic research. M. Finance and Statistics, 2010. 196–197. (In Russ.).

Manuscript submission date: 30.10.2024

 

For citation:

Volkova N.N., Romanyuk E.I. Contribution of regions to the technological sovereignty of the country: using the possibilities of statistical analysis // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 6. Pp. 93-115. (In Russ.).  https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_6_93_115   EDN: QWLHMY

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 6/2024.  Economics and Management.

Svetlana V. Kozlova

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Chief Researcher, Head of the Sector of Institutions and Mechanisms of Public Administration, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0009-0009-1708-4945

 

TRANSFORMATION OF STATE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTIONS: RESULTS OF 2022-2024 (PART II)

Размер файла56-69  Размер файла  300.18 KB Размер файла Full text

The article presents the results of the analysis of transformational changes in the state sub-program “Federal Property Management” over the past few years. Modern trends in state property management through state programs in accordance with the adopted regulations in the period under review are considered in detail. An assessment of institutional changes in the context of achieving national goals of socio-economic development of the country is carried out. The author examined the changes from the standpoint of the criterion - whether the changes in the state subprogram helped its impact on achieving the strategic development goals.

Keywords: state property management, management institutions, state programs, performance criteria.

JEL: H82, H19

EDN: WCOFUS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_6_56_69

References

  1. Kozlova S.V. Transformation of State Property Management Institutions: Results of 2022–2024 // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2024, No. 5. Рp. 42–57. EDN: HWKQIA. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2024_5_42_57. (In Russ.).
  2. Kozlova S.V., Zvyagintsev P.S. Transformation of the State Program “Federal Property Management” // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023. No. 1. Рp. 90–95. EDN: PCLKGJ. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2023_1_90_105. (In Russ.).
  3. Tulyakova I.V. Evaluation of the effectiveness of government programs: problems and prospects // Finkontrol. 2017. №4. Рp. 34–38. (In Russ.).
  4. Bratchenko S.A. Inconsistency of goals in public administration // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023. No. 6. Рp. 78–108. EDN: KDHKXU. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2023_6_78_108. (In Russ.).
  5. Bratchenko S.A. Inconsistency of goals in the development of government programs: a review of practice and analysis of situations // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2024. No. 1. Рp. 28–46. EDN: FXOLFG. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2024_1_28_46. (In Russ.).
  6. Martynova A.P., Roshchin S.Yu. Evaluation of the effectiveness and demand for evaluation of the effectiveness of state programs in the labor market // Issues of state and municipal administration. 2008. No. 4. Рp. 27–47. (In Russ.).
  7. Soloviev M.M., Koshkin L.I., Svirina A.A. State property management. Methodology, experience, innovation: textbook. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix, 2014. (In Russ.).

Manuscript submission date: 31.10.2024

 

For citation:

Kozlova S.V. Transformation of state property management institutions: results of 2022–2024 (part II) // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 6. Pp. 56-69. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_6_56_69  EDN: WCOFUS

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 6/2024.  Economics and Management.

Elena V. Bolgova

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor of the Department of Economics and Management, Volga Region State Transport University, Samara, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-0572-5014

 

Sergey A. Bolgov

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor of the Department of Economics and Management, Volga Region State Transport University, Samara, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-9663-0597

 

Evgenii V. Cherniaev

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Doctoral Student, Volsky Military Institute of Material Support, Volsk, Russia

ORCID: 0009-0003-9646-5995

 

DIGITAL INNOVATIONS AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE FORMATION OF THE RESOURCE-SAVING TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS SYSTEM

Размер файла70-92  Размер файла  515.93 KB Размер файла Full text

Digitalization is a key driver of economic and innovative development, including in modern transport and logistics systems, such as railways. The methodology of the study is based on the idea of R. Ciriello, A. Richter and G. Schwabe about the differentiation of “digital innovations” and “innovations implemented using digital technologies”. The empirical basis of the study was data from Russian Railways: requests for innovations for 2024 were analyzed in detail.

Keywords: transport, logistics, digital innovation, management tools, resource-saving trajectory.

JEL: O18, O31, O33, R40

EDN: FAGNRQ

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_6_70_92

References

  1. Afanasyev A.A. Formation of a limited open economy of a sovereign type in modern Russia. M.: First Economic Publishing House, 2022. DOI: 10.18334/9785912924415. (In Russ.).
  2. Kohli R., Melville N.P. Digital innovation: review and synthesis // Journal of Information Systems. 2019; 29(1): Pp. 200–223. DOI: 10.1111/isj.12193.
  3. Naumenko E.O. On the issue of models for managing the innovation process at an enterprise in modern conditions. Political network electronic journal of the scientific Kuban State Agrarian University. 2006. 20. Pp. 223–240. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-modelyah-upravleniya-innovatsionnym-protsessom-na-predpriyatii-vsovremennyh-usloviyah (accessed: 05.05.2024). (In Russ.).
  4. Rothwell R. On the way to the fifth generation innovation process // International Marketing Review. 1994. Vol. 11. No. 1. Pp. 7–31. DOI: 10.1108/0265133 94 10057491.
  5. Kline S.J., Rosenberg N., Landau R. The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth // Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 1986. Vol. 10. P. 612. https://www.semanticscholar.org/ paper/The-Positive-Sum-Strategy%3A-Harnessing-Technology-Landau-Rosenberg/2be5b7375796d7f777d8acaab 6a53a 5d81dfffb1?utm_source= directlink
  6. Wheelwright S.C., Clark K. B. Revolutionizing product development: quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. New York: Free Press, 1992. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=155
  7. Cooper R.G. Winning at new products. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1986. https://archive.org/details/winningnewproduc00robe
  8. Ciriello R.F., Richter A., Schwabe G. Digital innovation // Business & Information Systems Engineering. 2018. Vol. 60. Pp. 563–569. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-018-0559-8.
  9. Du Preez N.D., Louw L. A framework for managing the innovation process // PICMET’08-2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology. IEEE. 2008. Pp. 546–558. DOI: 10.1109/PICMET.2008.4599663.
  10. Dziallas M., Blind K. Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis // Technovation. 2019. Vol. 80. Pp. 3–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005.
  11. Łobejko S., Bartczak K. The role of digital technology platforms in the context of changes in consumption and production patterns // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13. Iss. 15. P. 8294. DOI: 10.3390/su13158294.
  12. Ametowobla D., Kirchner S. The organization of digital platforms: the role of digital technology and architecture for social order // Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 2023. Vol. 52. Iss. 2. Pp. 143–156. DOI: 10.1515/zfsoz-2023-2012.
  13. Barykin S. Y. et al. Economics of digital ecosystems // Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2020. Vol. 6. Iss. 4. Pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc6040124
  14. Tatipamula M. Open Innovation in the Context of Digital Ecosystems // The Oxford Handbook of Open Innovation. 2024. Pp. 773–785. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192899798.013.48.
  15. Wang Y., Shi J., Qu G. Research on Collaborative Innovation Cooperation Strategies of Manufacturing Digital Ecosystem from the Perspective of Multiple Stakeholders // Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2024. P. 110003. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2024.110003
  16. Bogers M.L.A.M. et al. Digital innovation: transforming research and practice // Innovation. 2022. Vol. 24. Iss. 1. Pp. 4–12. DOI: 10.1080/14479338.2021.2005465.
  17. Nambisan S. et al. Digital innovation management // MIS quarterly. 2017. Vol. 41. Iss. 1. Pp. 223–238. DOI: 10.25300/misq/2017/41:1.03.
  18. Nambisan S., Lyytinen K., Yoo Y. Digital innovation: towards a transdisciplinary perspective // Handbook of digital innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2020. Pp. 2–12. DOI: 10.4337/9781788119986.00008.
  19. Rissola G. et al. Digital innovation hubs in smart specialisation strategies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018. DOI: 10.2760/475335.
  20. Messina M. Designing the new digital innovation environment // CIOs and the Digital Transformation: A New Leadership Role. 2018. Pp. 147–180. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31026-8_9.
  21. Holmström J., Magnusson J., Mähring M. Orchestrating digital innovation: The case of the Swedish Center for Digital Innovation // Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2021. Vol. 48. Iss. 1. P. 31. DOI: 10.17705/1CAIS.04831.
  22. Promsa-ad S., Kittiphattanabawon N. Unveiling business activity patterns of digital transformation through K-means clustering with Universal Sentence Encoder in transport and logistics sectors // Journal of Telecommunications and the Digital Economy. 2024. Vol. 12. Iss. 1. Pp. 222–241. DOI: 10.18080/jtde.v12n1.866.
  23. Bakir I., Aerts-Veenstra M., Roodbergen K.J., Ünal B. Digital transformation in logistics from the perspective of a food distributor // A research agenda for digital transformation: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024. DOI: 10.1177/18479790241231730.
  24. Lam H.Y., Tang V., Wong L. Raising logistics performance to new levels through digital transformation // International Journal of Engineering Business Management. 2024. Vol. 16. DOI: 10.1177/18479790241231730.
  25. Pang Q., Cai L., Wang X., Fang M. Digital transformation as the fuel for sailing toward sustainable success: the roles of coordination mechanisms and social norms // Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 2024. DOI: 10.1108/JEIM-06-2023-0330.
  26. Kamal C.R. Agnes G., Jemima L., Chandrakala M. Automation of Business Processes Using Robots in the Fields of Supply Chain Management, Intelligent Transportation, and Logistics // In: AI in Business: Opportunities and Limitations. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. 2024. Vol. 515. Pp. 477–489. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-48479-7_41.

Manuscript submission date: 10.09.2024

 

For citation:

Bolgova E.V., Bolgov S.A., Cherniaev E.V. Digital innovations and digital technologies in the formation of the resource-saving transport and logistics system // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 6. Pp. 70-92. (In Russ.).  https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_6_70_92 EDN: FAGNRQ

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 6/2024.  Economics and Management.

Valentina V. Dorzhieva

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Head of the Center for Innovative Economics and Industrial Policy, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-9789-0024

 

PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY OF THE EAEU: IMPACT OF EXTERNAL SHOCKS AND PROSPECTS FOR ACHIEVING TECHNOLOGICAL SOVEREIGNTY

Размер файла40-55 Размер файла  482.86 KB Размер файла Full text

The article presents the results of the analysis of the main trends and features of the strategic partnership of the EAEU countries in the pharmaceutical industry. The influence of external shocks on the development of the pharmaceutical industry and the common market of medicines in the EAEU is analyzed. It is shown that the pharmaceutical industry is characterized by high sensitivity to external shocks and is very dependent on imports. The main problems of import substitution in the industry under study and the measures taken at the supranational level to overcome them are presented. The process of industrial cooperation in the field of production and development of pharmaceutical products, as well as the implementation of joint projects included in the “EAEU Industrialization Map”, is analyzed.

Keywords: EAEU, pharmaceutical sector, pharmaceutical industry, common market of medicines of the EAEU, import substitution, technological sovereignty.

JEL: F15, L65, O14

EDN: GQYHGE

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_6_40_55

References

  1. Vardomskiy L.B. Eurasian integration: some results and possible development scenarios // Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin. 2019. No. 4. Pp. 110–126. EDN: XKPLFN. (In Russ.).
  2. Golodova Zh.G., Smirnov P.A., Volodina E.R. Trends in the development of the pharmaceutical industry and tax measures to stimulate it in the EAEU countries // Finance, money, investments. 2023. No. 1. Pp. 10–17. DOI: 10.36992/2222-0917_2023_1_10. EDN: TVQGWQ. (In Russ.).
  3. Donchenko A. Development of industrial cooperation of the EAEU member states in modern conditions // International Life. 2024. No. 2. https://interaffairs.ru/jauthor/material/2953. (In Russ.).
  4. Dorzhieva V.V. Development institutions: new priorities and contribution to ensuring import substitution and technological sovereignty in the pharmaceutical industry // Issues of innovation economics. 2024. Vol. 14. No. 3. Pp. 789–800. DOI: 10.18334/vinec.14.3.121443. EDN: JLOVPD. (In Russ.).
  5. Dorzhieva V.V. On the strategy for the development of the pharmaceutical industry and the formation of Russia’s technological sovereignty in the context of the prospects of the Eurasian partnership // Society and Economy. 2024. No. 6. Pp. 49–60. DOI: 10.31857/S0207367624060041. EDN: BXFNEH. (In Russ.).
  6. Dorzhieva V.V. Strategy for the New Industrialization of the Pharmaceutical Industry: National Priorities and New Challenges // Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2023. No. 2 (240). Pp. 198–215. DOI: 10.38197/2072-2060-2023-240-2-198-215. EDN: XDAQOG. (In Russ.).
  7. Dorzhieva V.V. Pharmaceutical Industry: Consequences of the Impact of International Sanctions and the Results of the Reset on Technological Independence // Economy, Entrepreneurship and Law. 2023. Vol. 13. No. 12. Pp. 5595–5604. DOI: 10.18334/epp.13.12.120006. EDN: KURHCT. (In Russ.).
  8. Lenchuk E.B. et al. Structural Modernization of the Russian Economy: Conditions, Directions, Mechanisms / monograph / edited by E.B. Lenchuk, N. Yu. Akhapkin, V.I. Filatov. SPb.: Aleteya, 2022. EDN: AKJPDT. (In Russ.).
  9. Pylin A.G. Transformation of post-Soviet Eurasian integration under sanctions: opportunities and risks // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022. No. 6. Pp. 127–141. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2022_6_127_141. EDN: PCWCXU. (In Russ.).
  10. Sapir E.V., Karachev I.A. Common pharmaceutical market of the EAEU and Eurasian integration // Modern Europe. 2017. No. 2 (74). Pp. 121–134. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope22017121134. EDN: ZBMDPX. (In Russ.).

Manuscript submission date: 10.10.2024

 

For citation:

Dorzhieva V.V. Pharmaceutical industry of the EAEU: Impact of external shocks and prospects for achieving technological sovereignty // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. №. 6. Pp. 40-55. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_6_40_55 EDN: GQYHGE

  Creative Commons 4.0

  1. Ushkalova D.I. ESCALATION OF SANCTIONS PRESSURE: NEW RISKS FOR RUSSIA’S FOREIGN TRADE
  2. Akhapkin N.Yu. STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS OF THE RUSSIAN LABOR MARKET: EFFECTS OF SANCTIONS RESTRICTIONS
  3. Timerbulatova K.Yu. THE SIGNAL ROLE OF ADVERTISING IN OPINION LEADERS’ BLOGS IN SOCIAL NETWORKS
  4. Dodorina I.V., Cherniaev E.V. TERMINAL AND WAREHOUSE INFRASTRUCTURE: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

© Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2021 - 2024

32, Nakhimovskiy Prospekt, Moscow, Russia 117218, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Phone.: +7 (499) 724-13-91, E-mail: vestnik-ieran@inbox.ru

  

Russian version

HOME

JOURNAL DESCRIPTION

General information

Editorial policies

Author guidelines

LATEST ISSUE

ARCHIVE

Editorial advisory board

Editorial team

Author guidelines

Submit article