The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 5/2024.  Economics and Management.

Irina V. Dodorina

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor of the Department of Economics and Logistics in Transport, Samara State Transport University, Samara, Russia

ORCID: 0009-0002-8973-4125

Evgenii V. Cherniaev

Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Doctoral Student, Volsky Military Institute of Material Support, Volsk, Russia

ORCID: 0009-0003-9646-5995

TERMINAL AND WAREHOUSE INFRASTRUCTURE: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

87-100

451.74 KB

Full text

Abstract

The article analyzes the main indicators of the warehouse real estate market (by federal districts, highlighting the most important subjects). In modern conditions, the development of logistics infrastructure is an important factor in socio-economic development, which determines, among other things, the investment attractiveness of the region. Based on statistical data, the work shows that terminal and warehouse infrastructure plays a particularly significant role in the territories adjacent to megacities. At the same time, in all federal districts, as well as in Moscow and the Moscow region, St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region, the level of available warehouse space varies in the range from 0,1 to 1,7%, which is extremely low and indicates an acute shortage of warehouse space. This means that currently the terminal and warehouse infrastructure throughout almost the entire territory of the country is a factor constraining economic development. At the same time, the results of the analysis can act as a signal for business: investments in the development of terminal and warehouse infrastructure are expected to be profitable and should pay off effectively.

Keywords: terminal and warehouse infrastructure, logistics competence of the region, logistics services, regional warehouse real estate market, logistics facilities.

JEL: R11, R12

EDN: NRKNWB

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_5_87_100

References

1. Andreeva E.Y. Development of terminal and warehouse infrastructure in the Rostov region // Bulletin of the Rostov State University of Economics (RINH). 2013. No. 1–2. Рp. 23–29. EDN: QYQEWR. (In Russ.).
2. Gerami V.D., Kolik A.V. A systematic approach to the formation of a backbone network of logistics centers in Russia / in the collection: Logistics and security of Russia / Edited by T.M. Stepanyan. M.: MAKS Press. 2016. Рp. 71–78. EDN: WQTVLF. (In Russ.).
3. Kizim A.A., Mishchenko L.Ya., Shevchenko I.V. Features and trends of the organization of investment processes in the field of development of transport and logistics infrastructure of industry // National interests: priorities and security. 2014. No. 10. Рp. 2–16. EDN: SIUPDP. (In Russ.).
4. Olentsevich V.A. The current state and problems of development of the transport and logistics system of Russia / V.A. Olentsevich, V.V. Gorshkov, V.S. Brytkov // Modern technologies. System analysis. Modeling. 2024. No. 1 (81). Рp. 103–112. DOI: 10.26731/1813-9108.2024.1(81).103-112. (In Russ.).
5. Pokrovskaya O.D., Zabolotskaya K.A., Novikova I.D. The “Build-to-suit” solution in the segment of terminal logistics service // Proceedings of the St. Petersburg University of Railway Engineering. Petersburg: PGUPS, 2020. Vol. 17. Iss. 1. Рp. 35–43. DOI: 10.20295/1815-588X-2020-1-35-43. (In Russ.).
6. Rozhko O.N. Assessment of the logistics potential of the region // Bulletin of Economics, Law and Sociology. 2015. No. 3. Рp. 72-75. EDN: ULQYSZ.
7. Samuilov V.M., Pokrovskaya O.D. Practice and efficiency of formation of transport and logistics clusters // Bulletin of the Ural State University of Railway Engineering. No. 4. 2016. Рp. 76–88. DOI: 10.20291/2079-0392-2016-4-76-88. (In Russ.).
8. Chislov O.N., Bogachev V.A., Trapenov V.V., Bogachev T.V., Zadorozhny V.M. Configuring the terminal and warehouse infrastructure of a transport hub based on the development of the method of economic and geographical differentiation of cargo flows // Proceedings of Petersburg Transport University. SPb.: PGUPS. 2022. 19. Iss. 4. Рp. 800–811. DOI: 10.20295/1815-588X2022-4-800-811. (In Russ.).
9. Chislov O.N., Bogachev V.A., Trapenov V.V., Bogachev T.V., Zadorozhny V.M. Development of nodal terminal and warehouse infrastructure: modification of research methods and forecasts // Bulletin of scientific research results. 2023. Iss. 3. Рp. 46–57. DOI: 10.20295/2223-9987-2023-3-46-57. (In Russ.).
10. Shestov A. Features of the development of logistics infrastructure in Russia // RISK: resources, information, supply, competiti on. 2013. No. 4. Рp. 71–75. EDN: RUSMGL. (In Russ.).

Manuscript submission date: 10.09.2024

For citation:

Dodorina I.V., Cherniaev E.V. terminal and warehouse infrastructure: problems and prospects // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 5. Pp. 87-100. (In Russ.).  https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_5_87_100 EDN: NRKNWB

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 5/2024.  Economics and Management.

Svetlana V. Kozlova

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Chief Researcher, Head of the Sector of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0009-0009-1708-4945

TRANSFORMATION OF STATE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INSTITUTIONS: RESULTS OF 2022–2024

42-57

333.47 KB

Full text

Abstract

The article analyzes innovations in the field of such state property management institutions as privatization/deprivatization. An assessment is given of the effectiveness of state property management in recent years in the context of new challenges and realities, as well as in connection with the transformation of the goals that the Russian economy must achieve in the upcoming rather difficult period of its development. The analysis of the institutional environment revealed modern trends in the transformation of conceptual approaches to the management of state property, which is no longer considered only as a source of privatization revenue (as it has been for many years), but, first of all, as a tool for building a new policy in the field of attracting investment, developing entrepreneurial activity, restructuring of the economy, improving the material base of industrial production at a new, higher and more modern level of technological development.

Keywords: state property, management institutions, conceptual approaches to state property management, strategic goals, transformation of state property management institutions.

JEL: H82, H19

EDN: HWKQIA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_ 2024_5_42_57

References

1. Bratchenko S.A. Quality of public administration: the content of the concept // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2020. No. 6. Pр. 80–94. DOI: 10.24411/2073-6487-2020-10071. (In Russ.).
2. Silvestrov S.N. Conceptual mechanisms for managing structural modernization of the economy of the Russian Federation in the face of increasing risks // Bulletin of the Academy of Knowledge. 2024. No. 3 (62). Pр. 367–375. (In Russ.).
3. Blokhin A.A., Adamyan E.A., Kitaev A.E., Mironova I.I. Comparative assessments of the parameters of the goals of the state and other subjects of Russian economic management // Bulletin of Moscow University. Series Economy. 2019. No. 2. Pр. 3–25. EDN: CDIDPT. (In Russ.).
4. Pivovarova V. State Property: Essence and Features of Management // Creative Economy. 2024. Vol. 18. No. 7. Pр. 1769–1786. DOI: 10.18334/ce.18.7.121299.
5. Radygin A.D., Abramov A.E. et al. Effective management of state property in 2018–2024. and up to 2035: Analytical report/ CSR, 2018. (In Russ.).
6. Bokov V.V., Novoselov S.N. Transformation of the Institutional Structure: Key Definitions, Influencing Factors, Meso-Level Specifics // Economy: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. 2016. No. 5. Pр. 23–33. EDN: WHOQZZ. (In Russ.).
7. Kozlova S.V., Gribanova O.M. Institutional Environment for State Property Management in Modern Realities // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023. No. 4. Pр. 45–64. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2023_4_45_64. (In Russ.).
8. Bratchenko S.A. Methodological aspects of the efficiency of state property management // Journal of Economic Theory. 2020. Vol. 17. No. 1. Pр. 17–32. EDN: IDCTKX. DOI: 10.31063/2073-6517/2020.17-1.2. (In Russ.).
9. Ignatova M.S. Efficiency of state property management in Russia // Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Law. 2017. No. 1. Pр. 90–95. EDN: VUPHYX. DOI: 10.14529/law170115. (In Russ.).
10. Pivovarova O.V. On the issue of assessing the efficiency of state property management // Scientific and methodological electronic journal Concept. 2017. No. 31. Pр. 1131–1135. EDN: YPIVLF. (In Russ.).
11. Roy N.A., Shpak A.S., Mishina E.S. Modern trends in the state property management system in the Russian Federation: problems and solutions // Bulletin of Eurasian Science. 2018. No. 3. EDN: UXHRZW. (In Russ.).
12. Abramov A.E., Radygin A.D., Chernova M.I., Entov M. State property and efficiency characteristics // Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2017. No. 4. Pр. 5–37. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-4-5-37. (In Russ.).
13. Radygin A.D., Simachev Yu., Entov R. The state and denationalization: risks and limitations of the new privatization policy // Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2011. No. 9. Pр. 4–26. DOI:10.32609/0042-8736-2011-9-4-26. (In Russ.).
14. Okhotsky E.V., Frolov S.S. The quality of goal setting is a basic condition for effective public administration// Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 21. Management (state and society). 2020. No. 1. Pр. 21–42. EDN: PAKPOZ. (In Russ.).

Manuscript submission date: 05.09.2024

For citation:

Kozlova S.V. Transformation of state property management institutions: results of 2022–2024 // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 5. Pp. 42-57. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_5_42_57 EDN: HWKQIA

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 5/2024.  Economics and Management.

Tatyana S. Novikova

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Leading Researcher, the Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-8636-5219

TO THE QUESTION OF THE INTRODUCTION OF A PROGRESSIVE SCALE OF PERSONAL INCOME TAX IN RUSSIA

58-86

507.96 KB

Full text

Abstract

In the context of modern global challenges, the growth of tax progressivity is becoming an important tool of social policy, including in Russia. This paper puts forward a hypothesisabout reforming tax systems in accordance with the stages of scientific and technological development. It is verified on the basis of an analytical review of taxation trends using statistical data. The consequences of the introduction of a progressive personal income tax scale in Russia as an important component of the 2025 reform are analyzed using an agent-based approach with the measurement of the resulting effects based on indices of the consequences of tax progressivity, which are calculated using territorial Gini coefficients and social welfare functions with formal consideration of social inequality. The experimental results show a wide range of possibilities for reducing social inequality and allow us to assess the possible consequences of introducing a progressive personal income tax scale in 2025 as the first cautious step towards tax reform that corresponds to long-term priorities of scientific and technological development.

Keywords: tax policy, progressive taxation, agent-based modeling, social welfare functions, Gini index.

JEL: C63, H11, H20, H40

EDN: ESYCXX

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_5_58_86

References

1. Aganbegyan A.G. Overcoming poverty and reducing inequality in income and consumption in Russia // ECО. 2017. No. 9. Pp. 66–84. (In Russ.).
2. Anisimova L., Kadochnikov P., Malinina T., Nazarov V., Sinelnikov-Murylev S., Trunin I. Reform of taxation of population income in Russia: results of 2000–2007. Moscow: Institute for the Economy of the Transition Period, 2008. (In Russ.).
3. Balatsky E.V., Ekimova, N.A. Assessment of the fiscal and social efficiency of reforming individual income taxation in Russia // Journal of Applied Economic Research. 2021. Vol. 20. No. 2. Pp. 175–193. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2021.20.2.0082021_29с.
4. Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A., Yurevich M.A. Macroassessment of the effect of introducing a progressive scale of personal income tax // Municipal Academy. 2020. No. 3. Pp. 80–88. (In Russ.).
5. Varshavsky A.E. Excessive income inequality – problems and threats for Russia // Sociological studies. 2019. No. 8. Pp. 52–61. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/ S013216250006136-2.
6. Granberg A.G., Suslov V.I., Suspitsyn S.A. Multiregional systems: Economic and mathematical research. Novosibirsk: Sib. Scientific Publishing House, 2007. (In Russ.).
7. Kapelyushnikov I. Is economic inequality a universal evil? // Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2019. No. 4. Pp. 91–106. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/ 0042-8736-2019-4-91-106.
8. D. Kondratiev: Crises and forecasts in light of the theory of long waves. A view from modern times. Edited by L.E. Grinin, A.V. Korotaev, V.M. Bondarenko. M.: Uchitel Publishing House, 2017. (In Russ.).
9. Kulikova N., Sinitsina I. Experience of applying a flat income tax scale in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe // Society and Economy. 2018. No. 9. Pp. 74–90. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760001439-1.
10. Livshits V.N. Systems analysis of market reform of the non-stationary economy of Russia, 1992- M.: URSS, 2013. (In Russ.).
11. Martyanova E.V., Polbin A.V. Scenario assessment of macroeconomic effects of progressive taxation in Russia // Financial Journal. 2024. Vol. 16. No. 1. Pp. 8–30. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2024-1-8-30.
12. Nikulina O.M. Tax burden in Russia: main approaches // Finance and Credit. 2016. Vol. 22. No. 17. Pp. 13–27. (In Russ.).
13. Novikova T.S., Korolkova M.V. Conceptual constructs of modern scientific and technological development: a review of foreign approaches // World of Economics and Management. 2019. Vol.19. No. 1. Pp. 115–132. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25205/2542-0429-2019-19-1-115-132.
14. Novikova T.S., Tsyplakov A.A. Agent-oriented approach to substantiating state spatial policy // Journal of the Siberian Federal University. Humanities. 2024. Vol. 17. No. 3. 607–620. (In Russ.). EDN: UUXQVX.
15. Novikova, T.S., Tsyplakov, A.A. Social policy development based on a combination of agent-oriented and inter-industrial approaches // Journal of the New Economic Association. 2021. No. 4 (52). Pp. 12–36. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2021-52-4-1.
16. Ordynskaya E.V., Cherkovets M.V., Moiseev A.K. The Impact of Direct and Indirect Taxation on the Level of Population Income // Scientific Works of the Institute of Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022. Vol. 20. Pp. 242–265. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47711/ 2076-318-2022-242-265.
17. Piketty T. Capital in the XXI century. M.: Ad Marginem, 2015. 592 p. (In Russ.). Translation from French. Le Capital au XXIᵉ siècle Paris: Seuil. 2013.
18. Pitelin A.K. Applied aspects of progressive taxation of personal income // Economic science of modern Russia. 2023. No. 1. Pp. 63–72. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2023-1(100)-63-72.
19. Sadovnichiy V.А., Akaev А.А., Ilyin I.V., Korotaev A.V., Malkov S.Yu. Modeling and Forcasting of Global Dynamics in the XXI Century // Moscow University 2022. No. 1. Pp. 5–35. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21202/2782-2923.2023.2.253-268.
20. Stiglitz J. The Price of Inequality. How Social Stratification Threatens Our Future. M: Eksmo, 2015. (In Russ.).
21. Suslov V.I., Novikova T.S, Tsyplakov A.A. Simulation of the Role of Government in Spatial Agent-Based Model // Economy of Region. 2016. No. 3. Pp. 951–965. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17059/2016-3-28.
22. Acemoglu D., Johnson S. Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity. New York: Public Affairs, 2023.
23. Alventosa A., Olcina G. Tax Compliance and Wealth Inequality // Applied Economics Letters. 2019 Vol. 27. No. 11. Pp. 899–903. DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2019.1646859.
24. Atkinson A.B., Anthony B. The Economics of Inequality. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press
25. Atkinson A.B., Stiglitz J.E. The Design of Tax Structure: Direct versus Indirect Taxation // Journal of Public Economics. 1976. Vol. 6. No. 1–2. Pp. 55–75. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(76)90041-4.
26. Barrios S., Ivaškaitė-Tamošiūnė V., Maftei A., Narazani E., Varga J. Progressive Tax Reforms in Flat Tax // Countries Eastern European Economics. 2020. Vol. 58. No. 2. 83–107. DOI: 10.1080/00128775.2019.1671201.
27. Botta A., Caverzasi E., Russo A., Gallegati M., Stiglitz J.E. Inequality and Finance in a Rent Economy // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2021. Vol. 183. 998–1029. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.02.013.
28. Boushey H., DeLong J.B., Steinbaum M. (eds.) After Piketty — The Agenda for Economics and Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.
29. Calabuig V., Olcina G. The Elite, Inequality and the Emergence of Progressive Taxation // European Journal of Political Economy. 2023. Vol. 79. 102433. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102433.
30. Chakravarty S.R., Rama P., Rupayan P., Palash S. Minimum Inequality Taxation, Average and Minimally Progressive Taxations and Depolarization / Mumbai: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research. WP-2022-010. http://www.igidr.ac.in/pdf/publication/WP-2022-010.pdf.
31. Dasgupta P., Stiglitz J.E. On Optimal Taxation and Public Production // Review of Economic Studies. 1972. Vol. 39. No. 1. Pp. 87–103. DOI: 10.2307/2296446.
32. Diamond P., Saez E. The Case for a Progressive Tax: From Basic Research to Policy Recommendations // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2011. Vol. 25. No. 4. 165–190. DOI: 10.1257/jep.25.4.165.
33. Entin S.J., Li H., Pomerleau K. Overview of the Tax Foundation’s General Equilibrium Model. / Tax Foundation, April 2018 Update. https://taxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/TaxFoundaton_ General-Equilibrium-Model-Overview1.pdf
34. Global Tax Evasion Report 2024 // EU Tax Observatory. 2024. https://www.taxobservatory.eu/www-site/uploads/2023/10/global_tax_evasion_report_24.pdf
35. Gluschenko K.P. Regional Inequality in Russia: Anatomy of Convergence // Regional Research of Russia. 2023. Vol. 13. Suppl. 1. Pp. S1–S12. DOI: 10.1134/S207997052360004X.
36. Godar P.S., Paetz C., Truger A. The Scope for Progressive Tax Reform in the OECD Countries: A Macroeconomic Perspective with a Case Study for Germany. IMK Working Paper, No. 150, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. Düsseldorf: Institut für Makroökonomie und Konjunkturforschung (IMK). https://hdl.handle.net/10419/113262.
37. Hammond J. Reassessing the Diamond/Mirrlees Efficiency Theorem // P.J. Hammond and G.D. Myles (eds.). Incentives, Organization, and Public Economics: Papers in Honour of Sir James Mirrlees. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ch. 12. Pp. 193–216. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199242290.003.0012.
38. Hashimzade N., Myles G.D., Page F., Rablen M.D. The Use of Agent-Based Modelling to Investigate Tax Compliance. // Economics of Governance. 2015. Vol. 16. Pp. 143–164. DOI: 10.1007/s10101-014-0151-8.
39. Jalles J.T., Karras G. Tax Progressivity and Output: Evidence from OECD countries. REM Working Paper 0293-2023. Lisboa: REM – Research in Economics and Mathematics. 2023. Pp. 1–34. https://rem.rc.iseg.ulisboa.pt
40. Kakwani N., Son H.H. Normative Measures of Tax Progressivity // Economic Inequality and Poverty: Facts, Methods, and Policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. 302–336. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198852841.003.0012.
41. Kaplow L. Optimal Income Taxation // Journal of Economic Literature. 2024. Vol. 62. 2. Pp. 637–738. DOI: 10.1257/jel.20221647.
42. Khudyakova L.S., Sidorova E.A. New Stage of Global Tax Reform // World Economy and International Relations. 2022. Vol. 66. No. 8. Pp. 34-42. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-8-34-42.
43. Lancker W., Heede A. Economic Equality and the Welfare State. Leuven: Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven. 2019. SPSW Working Paper, CESO/SPSW/2019-2.
44. Ledić M., Rubil , Urban I. Tax Progressivity and Social Welfare with a Continuum of Inequality Views. International Tax and Public Finance. 2023. Vol. 30. Pp. 1266–1296. DOI: 10.1007/s10797-022-09752-y.
45. Llacer T., Miguel Quesada F.J., Noguera J.A., Tapia Tejada, E. SIMULFIS: A Simulation Tool to Explore Tax Compliance Behavior // S. Hokamp, L. Gulyás, M. Koehler and Wijesinghe (eds.). Agent-Based Modeling of Tax Evasion: Theoretical Aspects and Computational Simulation. Wiley, 2018. Pp. 125–151. DOI: 10.1002/ 9781119155713. ch5.
46. Mineva D., Stefanov R. Evasion of Taxes and Social Security Contributions. Vitosha Research EOOD. 2015. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=20207&langId=en.
47. Mirrlees J.A. An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation // The Review of Economic Studies. 1971. Vol. 38. No. 2. Pp. 175–208.
48. Nesterova K.V. Estimating the Effect of Progressive Personal Income Tax Schedule for Russia in a Global CGE-OLG Model // Journal of Tax Reform. 2024. Vol. 10. № Pp. 334–354. DOI: 10.15826/ jtr.2024.10.2.172.
49. Neveu A.R. Fiscal Policy and Business Cycle Characteristics in a Heterogeneous Agent Macro Model // Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2013. Vol. 92. 224–240. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.06.006.
50. Novokmet F., Piketty T., Zucman G. From Soviets to Oligarchs: Inequality and Property in Russia 1905-2015 // Journal of Economic Inequality. 2018. Vol. 16. No. 2. Pp. 189–223. DOI: 10.1007/s10888-018-9383-0.
51. Ocampo J.A. A New Approach to International Tax Cooperation. Project Syndicate. 2023. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/latin-america-must-support-unnegotiations-global-tax-reform-by-jose-antonio-ocampo-2023-11.
52. Owens J. Tax Policy in the 21st Century: New Concepts for Old Problems. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. Global Governance Programme. No. 2013/05. Policy Briefs. Global Economics. 2013. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/28499
53. Palagi E., Napoletano M., Roventini A., Gaffard, J.L. An Agent-Based Model of Trickle-Up Growth and Income Inequality // Economic Modelling. 2023. Vol. 129. 106535. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106535.
54. Pechman J.A. Tax Reform: Theory and Practice // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1987. Vol. 1. No. 1. Pp. 11–28. DOI: 10.1257/jep.1.1.11.
55. Piketty T., Saez E. Optimal Labor Income Taxation // Handbook of Public Economics. 2013. Vol. 5. Pp. 391–474. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53759-1.00007-8.
56. Piketty T., Saez E., Zucman G. Rethinking Capital and Wealth Taxation // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2023. Vol. 39. No. 3. Pp. 575–591. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grad026.
57. Piroli, G., and Peschner, J. The impact of taxation structure on growth: Empirical evidence from EU27 member states, EERI Research Paper Series, No. 05/2023, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/298334.
58. Saez E., Zucman G. Progressive Wealth Taxation // Brookings Papers of Economic Activity. 2019. Vol. 50. No. 2. Pp. 437–533.
59. Saez E., Zucman G. The Triumph of Injustice: How the Rich Dodge Taxes and How to Make Them Pay. NY: W. W. Norton & Company, 2019.
60. Thomas A. Measuring Tax Progressivity in Low-Income Countries. World Bank Group. Policy Research Working Paper 10460. 45 p. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099726205302311330/pdf/IDU0e90c180f02 d440491b096440 8160 c39c8678.pdf.

Manuscript submission date: 10.09.2024

For citation:

Novikova T.S. To the Question of the introduction of a progressive scale of personal income tax in Russia// Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 5. Pp. 58-86. (In Russ.).  https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_5_58_86 EDN: ESYCXX

  Creative Commons 4.0

The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 5/2024.  Economics and Management.

Alexandra V. Odintsova

Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher of the Center for Federal Relations and Regional Development, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-3569-1000

PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTING LOCAL GOVERNANCE CONCEPT IN RUSSIA

21-41

344.58 KB

Full text

Abstract

One of the key issues of spatial development at the present stage is to ensure the balanced development of Russian territories. The article examines current problems of municipal development in the Russian Federation taking into account the principles laid down in the concept of local governance as one of the components of the modern public authority system. The history and meaningful analysis of the concept are given, the key problems are identified, on the solution of which, in accordance with this concept, the implementation of the goals of the spatial policy of our country largely depends. Based on the use of stakeholder concepts and institutional proximity, the practice of municipal strategizing is evaluated.

Keywords: institutional proximity, local government, municipal formation, spatial development, local governance concept.

JEL: R50, O29

EDN: HPONPM

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_5_21_41

References

1. Kooiman J. Findings, Speculations and Recommendations, dans J. Kooiman (dir). Modern Governance. London. Sage. 1993. (In Russ.).
2. Polterovich V.M. The crisis of institutions of political competition, the Internet and collaborative democracy // Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 52–72. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-52-72. (In Russ.).
3. Odintsovа A.V. Spatial economics in the works of representatives of the French school of regulation // Spatial Economics. 2011. No. 3. Pp. 56–70. EDN: OIMPMN. (In Russ.).
4. Odintsovа A.V. Local self-government as an institution of development // Federalism. 2015. No. 2. Pp. 87–100. DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2015-2-87-100. (In Russ.).
5. Yakovleva S.I. Spatial models in strategies of socio-economic development of Russian regions // Pskov Regionological Journal. 2014. No. 17. Pp. 3–16. EDN: SJEHCJ. (In Russ.).
6. Orekhovsky P.A. «The spirit of place» and the role of the territorial self-identification of the elite in the socio-economic development of cities // South Russian Forum. 2013. No. 2 (7). Pp. 82–101. EDN: RTQHBT. (In Russ.).
7. Discussion club on the topic: “Approaches to the assessment of municipal strategies” // Website of the Institute of Urban Economics. 29.10.2019. https://urbaneconomics.ru/centr-obshchestvennyh-svyazey/news/diskussionnyy-klub-na-temu-podhody-kocenke-municipalnyh (accessed: 05.11.2024). (In Russ.).
8. Kosenkova M. Civil communities in municipalities want to be consolidated by law // The Рarliamentary newspaper. 28.10.2022. https://www.pnp.ru/top/grazhdanskiesoobshhestva-v-municipalitetakh-khotyat-zakrepit-zakonom.html (accessed: 08.20.2024).
9. Hillery G.A. (Jr.) (1955). Definitions of Community: Area of Agreement // Rural Sociology. Vol. 20 (June). No. 2. Pp. 111–123.
10. Jacobs J. Death and life of big American cities. M.: New Publishing house. 2011.
11. Odintsovа A.V. Local community: the problem of institutionalization // Questions of theoretical economics. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 52–63. DOI: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2023_2_52_63. (In Russ.).
12. Pecqueur B. Le tournant territorial de l’économie globale. Espaces et sociétés. 2006. No. 124–125/2–3. Рp. 5–6. http://iga.ujf-grenoble.fr/territoires/publications
13. Torre A., 2008. On the Role Played by Temporary Geographical Proximity in Knowledge Transmission // Regional Studies. Vol. 42. No. 6. Pp. 869–889.
14. Torre A. Jalons pour une analyse dynamique des Proximités // Revue d’économie régionale et urbaine. 2010. № 3. P. 417. https://shs.cairn.info/revue-d-economieregionale-et-urbaine-2010-3-page-409?lang=fr#s2n2
15. Pecqueur B., Ternaux P. Mondialisation, restructuration et gouvernance territoriale // Géographie, économie, société. 2005. No. 7.
16. Le Budget participative: le pouvoir aux parisiennes // P. Dossier de presse. 2018. 2 octobre. https://budgetparticipatif.paris.fr/bp/plugins/download/BP2018-DossierDePresse.pdf
17. Report on the best practices in the development of initiative budgeting in the subjects of the Russian Federation and municipalities. The Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation. 2024.
18. A New-York, le budget participative renouvelle la participation démocratique. http://lesbudgetsparticipatifs.fr/a-new-york-le-budget-participatif-renouvelle-laparticipation-democratique/

Manuscript submission date: 10.09.2024

For citation:

Odintsova A.V. Problems of implementing local governance concept in Russia // Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2024. № 5. Pp. 21-41. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2024_5_21_41 EDN: HPONPM

  Creative Commons 4.0